Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Literary elements or techniques
Literary techniques
Literary devices used in prose
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The stories of the Epic of Gilgamesh and Noah’s Ark were written during similar time
periods in areas that are geographically close to each other. Both stories have a similar plot:
God(s) destroy(s) areas with massive floods because those areas have done something that
displeased Him. There are similarities and differences between these two stories. The similarities
are very prominent because the plot is the same. However, the differences are more subtle.
One similarity between these stories surrounds the reason why the God(s) decided to
punish the people in these places with a flood. In the Epic of Gilgamesh, the reason the Gods
gave for causing the flood were because of cacophonous loudness that the humans produced. In
the
…show more content…
However, the exact reasons why the God(s)
decided to murder all humans were different.
Secondly, these stories differ in who the God(s) wanted to save. In the Epic of Gilgamesh
all people who helped build the boat, animals, and the kin/family of Gilgamesh were saved. In
the story of Noah’s Ark, only Noah, his family, and the animals were saved. The rationale of
God in the story of Noah’s Ark was that everyone, except Noah, were deserving to die.
Moreover, the Epic of Gilgamesh had only the city of Shurrupak flooded, not the entirety of the
Earth. These differences demonstrate that the Epic of Gilgamesh was more of an actual story,
whereas the story of Noah’s Ark was more of a story intended to discipline and proselytize
followers.
Lastly, the story of the Epic of Gilgamesh and Noah’s Ark differ in morality. Whereas
the Epic of Gilgamesh concerned more of vengeful Gods wanting to punish humans, the story of
Noah’s Ark dealt with God wanting to punish all humans because He wanted to teach future
humans lessons on sin. Furthermore, the Epic of Gilgamesh had regretful Gods feeling
It contains useful comparisons and historical data to help support his analysis. The author considers the story to hold very value for Christians. It concerns the typical myths that were tied to pagan people. Despite that theory, there have been many Christians who have studied the afterlife and creation in the epic. He suggests an interesting thought when he starts to explain the story. The author hints that maybe the main character, Gilgamesh, was a historical figure. The base analysis for his line of thought is the story of the flood found in the bible. After looking at the lengths of time of each story, he considers it to not be a problem. To provide some evidence, the author shows a chart of a series of questions about each flood and compares the two. The most striking comparison in the chart was the command to build a boat; "O man of Shuruppak, son of Ubar-Tutu, tear down thy house, build a ship; abandon wealth, seek after life; scorn possessions, save thy life. Bring up the seed of all kinds of living things into the ship which thou shalt build. Let its dimensions be well measured."17 The text from the quote can almost match what the bible said. In both stories the person was commanded to build a boat because a flood is coming due to man’s sins or man’s wickedness. In the conclusion of the article, the author says a bold statement; “the widespread nature of flood traditions throughout the entire human race is exce...
Gilgamesh, a Sumerian epic, is one of the oldest recorded narratives, yet it still holds relevance today. The epic is composed of 12 stone tablets that were discovered in 1853, and the ancient text lives in a state of flux with many different translations existing today. The text first entered the world stage only once George Smith published the portion of the text that related to the flood from the Hebrew bible. (Mosley Para. 64) The central character, Gilgamesh king of Uruk, is two parts god and one part man. He is handsome, brave, and strong but he is also boastful and filled with pride. He cares very little for his people and “does not leave a girl to her mother” (I, 65). Although he is ultimately perceived as a hero, Gilgamesh has more
The theme in Gilgamesh, Genesis and Sur 11 are comparably the same in that the people in each story were with sin and wickedness. In all three literatures, the people in the beginning were mean and sinful. The people in the Epic of Gilgamesh were evil and when Gilgamesh came to power he did not known what to since it was his first time beinging king. So, he would rule in a stern way to keep the people from sin. On Genesis God wanted to flood the Earth from the people who were sinful. God asked Noah to build an ark and to take his family and two of each animal.
“The Lord saw that the wickedness of humankind was great in the earth, and that every inclination of the thoughts of their hearts was only evil continually. And the Lord was sorry that he had made humankind on the earth, and it grieved him to his heart. So the lord said, ‘I will blot out from the earth the human beings I have created-people together with animals and creeping things and birds of the air, for I am sorry that I have made them.’ But Noah found favor in the sight of the Lord.”(Genesis 6:5-8)
The Lord saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that very imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually. And the Lord was sorry that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him to his heart. So the Lord said, “I will blot out man whom I have created from the face of the ground, man and beast and creeping things and birds of the air, for I am sorry that I have made them.”
The Epic of Gilgamesh is a poem dating all the way back to ancient Mesopotamia, 2700-2500 B.C.E., and is considered to be one of the first literary writings. The Mesopotamians lived in a way that, at first glance can remind one of the Ancient Greeks. The two cultures seemed to share similar characteristics, like their interaction with the gods, comparable hierarchy, kingship, and religious class being the social order, and the acceptance of combat and violence, all of which can be witnessed in the epic. So it can be assumed that the Epic of Gilgamesh exerted a profound influence on ancient Greek culture, and many other cultures throughout history.
They were two epics that established the foundations of religion, literature, and all other standards that were followed by every category of people. Both texts entice the audience through antique language, and the stories of epic heroes and immortal gods. Sin-Leqi-Unninni and the many writers of the Bible use love as their central theme, yet it unfolds as having distinguishing effects on all characters throughout both texts. In The Epic of Gilgamesh, the author conveys love as a motivational factor for helping Gilgamesh and other characters transition into better individuals, whereas in the Old Testament, individuals do harm upon others in the name of love in order to follow what is morally correct based on the religious
The two stories closely parallel each other, though Gilgamesh was written down before 2000 BCE and the version in Genesis was compiled ca. 400 BCE. Biblical writers probably knew of the much older myth but revised it so that it fit with their own history and worldview. They intended it to fit with their own mythology. Despite the many similarities between the two stories, this difference in intention is revealed in a number of motifs that distinguish the biblical story from the ancient myth:
The Epic of Gilgamesh has many similarities to the Bible, especially in Genesis and it’s not just that the both begin with the letter “g”’! One major similarity being the flood story that is told in both works. The two stories are very similar but also very different. Another being the use of serpents in both works and how they represent the same thing. A third similarity being the power of God or gods and the influence they have on the people of the stories. Within these similarities there are also differences that need to be pointed out as well.
Ancient world literature and early civilization stories are mostly centered on human’s relationship with higher beings. Ancient civilizations were extremely religious, holding the belief that their very lives were in the hands of their almighty god or goddess. This holds true for both the people of biblical times as well as those of the epic era. However, their stories have some differences according to cultural variation but the main structure, ideas, and themes are generally found correlative. It is hard to believe that one work did not affect the others. The first great heroic epic poem of Gilgamesh and the Old Testament are parts of two cultures that are hundreds of years apart. Whereas Gilgamesh is a myth and the book of Genesis is the basis of many religions, they both have notably similar accounts of symbols, motifs, meaningful events according to the relationship between the divine and humans in literature.
In Genesis there is a much more acceptable reason for God to eliminate mankind. The humans are so wicked and evil that "It repented the Lord that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him at his heart" (Gen. 6:6). He says: "I will destroy man whom I have created from the face of the earth. . . " (Gen.
Noah was given a great blessing, however, he was also given several rules to follow as well that would set Noah and his descendants apart from evil. This is the story of the righteous and blameless Noah. The massive destruction, power and faith in the story of Noah is what makes this such a well known story. For that reason many articles have been written about this Biblical account, with many differing interpretations. The article that will be discussed in this paper takes this in a way many Christians would.
The Epic of Gilgamesh and The Odyssey both are held in high respect by literature analysts and historians alike for the characterization of the hero and his companion, the imagery brought to mind when one of them is read, and the impressive length in relation to the time period it was written in. The similarities that these two epics share do not end with only those three; in fact, the comparability of these works extend to even the information on the author and the archetypes used. However, The Odyssey and The Epic of Gilgamesh contrast from one another in their writing styles, character details, and main ideas. Both epics weave together a story of a lost man who must find his way, but the path of their stories contrast from one another.
similarities that are inevitably beyond mere coincidence. One could surmise that both of these stories might have a basis in common historical occurrence. However, despite the fact that both of these works discuss a common topic, the portrayal of this event is quite different. Like identical twins raised in different cultures, the expressions of these works are products of their environment.
A well-known but often inaccurately portrayed Biblical story present in today’s society is the story of the Flood presented in Genesis. There is not a single form of media or literature that presents the story of the Flood as depicted in Genesis completely accurately. These different forms of the story do carry many of the major themes presented in the narrative. However, the details and depictions of the narratives are altered for the sake of the consumer. By consuming these forms of media of the Biblical narrative, the audience becomes a victim of a non-biblical story. The paper sought to analyze two different mediums depicting the story of Noah and the flood, comparing and relating the stories to the Genesis version and thus analyzing the impact of such misrepresentations. The first medium to be analyzed is Noah and the Ark from The Beginners Bible, a children’s book containing about 90 biblical stories, chosen for its popularity. The other medium is the movie Noah (2014), a movie depicting Aronofsky’s interpretation of the story chosen because of the controversy it stirred. Both books were chosen for its popularity and the impacts it had on its audience.