Compare And Contrast Grendel And Beowulf

672 Words2 Pages

Beowulf Versus Grendel
Imagine being scooped out of a couch, in the middle of the night, while you’re dead asleep, and run off with to be eaten. That’s the fate of more than a few warriors in the mead hall of King Hrothgar of the Epic Beowulf. I, for one, think such horrifying actions deserve the very bloody consequences they brought about. Beowulf is a hero above all others for his fearless actions to combat the monster responsible, Grendel, who torments and murders anyone unfortunate enough to cross his path. Though Grendel is part of a race of monsters, (Breeden) that is not the basis for the justice served to him, that punishment was entirely decided by his deeds.
Beowulf, third in line to the throne of Geats, is a great warrior, already known for his heroic deeds and battle, including the defeat of nine sea serpents while swimming in a full suit of armor. (Breeden) Beowulf comes to King Hrothgar’s aid, to repay a debt owed for saving his father’s life, vowing to fell Grendel during his nightly raid of the great Mead Hall, and does as he boasted. (Breeden) Beowulf isn’t interested in the gold or other rewards, necessarily, what he wants is fame, glory, to repay the debts owed, and to free the kingdom of its nightly terror. Those are noble pursuits, as …show more content…

Grendel is to blame for the situation he created that led to his death. Beowulf was simply the hero destined to end his reign of terror, through the gifts bestowed upon him by God. In this epic, there are multiple circumstances where Beowulf would not have prevailed had it not been for his God-given strength, allowing him to defeat Grendel with a weapon, which would not have worked, and to use the giant sword to kill Grendel’s mother. (Breeden) I believe these are further examples supporting Beowulf’s justification, and fate even, to defeat Grendel, in exactly the manner he

Open Document