"Marrakech," an essay by George Orwell, accomplishes a key balance by providing descriptive imagery, literal and direct views that are presented through the diction, and transitioning the narrator from one setting to the next. This balance allows the reader to fully grasp Orwell's intent of showing the reader that colonialism has corrupted the views of the white society, leading to their lack of acknowledgement of any dignity that the most unfortunate people in humanity may have.
Orwell is clearly trying to get a point across to the reader, and he wants to make a lasting impression with it. The passage begins with "As the corpse went past, flies left the restaurant table in a cloud and rushed after it, but they came back a few minutes later," which instantly establishes in the reader's mind a strong sense of disrespect and a gut-wrenching disgust. Strong imagery is used again when the treatment and "burials" of the gazelles is mentioned. Instead of treating those who provide so much in the vacant lives of the people with respect and loyalty, as they show the people, they misuse them and they abuse them, and when they are finished doing that, they simply "tip [them] into the ditch, and the village dogs have torn [their] guts out before [they are] cold." Again, Orwell presents to his reader the anonymity that all things, living and dead, have due to colonialism. The Jewish Ghetto is yet another description that Orwell utilizes when saying, "Many of the streets are a good deal less than six feet wide, the houses are windowless, and sore-eyed children cluster everywhere...like clouds of flies." The picture that the imagery paints to the reader in this passage is poverty-stricken and extremely unpleasant. The same is true when the ...
... middle of paper ...
..." Instead of accepting the fact that the white race was prevailing and omnipotent, the narrator is now able to perceive the damage that colonialism has done on society. This line is what ties together Orwell's intent and the impression he had sought out to compose because it is the key moment of realization for the narrator.
"Marrakech" portrays to its audience the challenges of life that thousands face throughout the world. By accurately and efficiently using imagery, direct views, and illustrating the significance of the transitions between each "scene" in "Marrakech," Orwell balances his purpose with a strong picture of poverty, racial inequality, and anonymity. Colonialism oppression cannot last forever, as shown in the last paragraph of the text, but for now, it will require more than only one white man to distinguish that in order for anything to change.
... majority of the Black people to the atrocities, injustices and inequalities of their white masters, against which they make no organized protest at all, so she agrees with the reality that the next generations follow almost the same ways observed and adopted by the majority of their ancestors. It is therefore she is of the opinion that the Black people have accepted the slavery and atrocities as their fate. However, Butler’s comments, made through the mouth of her protagonist, serve as half truth in contemporary era, as the modern times witness the movements of liberty and freedom from the exploitations of the Blacks at the hands of the Whites. Somehow, it is also a reality that an overwhelming majority of the Blacks still look under the control and submission of the White population.
Having witnessed the racism and assimilation in the colonial Antilles, Frantz Fanon devotes himself to the battle for a human world--that is, a world of mutual recognition--where all races are equal. Applying the idea mutual recognition from Hegel to his situation, Fanon believes that mutual recognition is achieved when the White and the Black approve each other’s human reality, which is the capacity to have dreams and to turn them into reality. On the contrary, Friedrich Nietzsche believes the hope for humanity lies in the endless self-transcendence of becoming the overman, ignoring whether one receives acknowledgement from others or not. From his perspective, the overman is better achieved by solitude. Furthermore, Nietzsche bitterly criticizes the advocation of equality which is motivated by revenge against more powerful people. Nevertheless, he fails to realize that there are other situations where fight for equality is crucial to fully claim the humanity of the oppressed people. One of such situations is that for the Black in the colonial Antilles, which Fanon describes in Black Skin, White Masks, characterized by the lack of recognitions from the superior Europeans. As far as I am concerned, mutual recognition is important not only for solving the Black’s problem in the colonial situation, but also for empowering people of different groups nowadays to establish equal relationships, to maximize own potentials, to exceed to become the overman. To be specific, I will elaborate how the mutual recognition theory could be used to free women and men from deeply rooted inequality.
Through the era of colonization, several powerful European countries like France and Great Britain colonized the Caribbean Islands. On account of the Europeans settlement in these beautiful islands, they established a different cultural system among the Caribbean population. After the Independence of the Caribbean land mass, a conflict between civilians occurred as the leaders have changed, this change created an unjust, and a cruel exercise of authority among many innocent citizens. Edwidge Danticat’s novel, Krik? Krak!, and Austin Clarke’s text, Growing Up Stupid Under the Union Jack, illustrate oppression of a higher authority towards lower people. The social performance of inserting restrictions on an individual is a pitiless action.
The time is 5:44 pm. The setting is in a restaurant. Here you will see the faces of many people whose fate has been sealed for them. Some seems happy, some seems confused, while some seems sad. A happy bartender is talking and enjoying the accompanies of his customers,
George Orwell uses setting, characterization and symbols to show that true power come from following the dictates of one’s conscience. The state of power established through the imperialistic backdrop show that Orwell should have control over the Burmese. Also, the perspective and ideas given by Orwell show his true character and lessens the overall power set up for him. Lastly, the symbols Orwell uses show representation of traditional forms of power, but take on different implications in the story. These points come together to prove that power exists within one’s self and not through one’s position, conquests or by the items they possess. In the end, it can be said that man’s journey for power will be a continuous struggle until the end of time but that in order at attain power, one must learn to listen to one’s conscience.
“It illustrates how language can be the core of a person’s reality, how it can be used to obscure the truth, and even how it can be used to change the past.” (Berkes) Just think of your world, powered by a government that has no end or suppression. Sometimes we all think that the government is in a bad place, but with Orwell’s work we can see that indeed it can be controlled even more. “Predicting the future wasn’t Orwell’s goal” (Fischer), but it was used as a tool to warn the future that if we don’t govern what our country is doing, it can slowly take over our lives. “Language is one of the key instruments of political dominations, the necessary and insidious means of the ‘totalitarian’ control of reality.” (Rai) Communication and language have shaped our world and will continue to help expand the reaches of human existence; as with anyone’s reality, your thoughts and dreams are all made up of communication and ideas. Its only when someone treads on your deepest sense of personality, that you understand the power of human thought and language. “Orwell’s novel validates that language, when used in a manner that has a political standpoint, can tread on the very existence of reality.”
The “great blue flies” symbolize London’s citizens, their thirst for human suffering, and their reliance on others’ pain. Dickens first introduces the flies during Charles Darnay’s trial, and “the buzz of the great blue flies grew loud again” (Dickens 52) when he is acquitted. The confused onlookers begin to chatter and “buzz,” as flies do. The people have one desire, which is to feast their eyes upon the torment of others. Instead of exuberance over Charles’ acquittal, the people overlook the joy because they crave only his torment. After the trial, “a loud buzz swept into the street as if the baffled blue flies were dispersing in search of other carrion,” (59) as the disappointed citizens flooded into the streets. The French citizens are hungry for pain; they desire something else to feast their eyes upon, such as the terror of the Guillotine. This moment is one that highlights heartlessness in the story, as the citizens go in search of others’ suffering to feast upon, as a fly gorges on dead meat. The blue flies in the story are the London citizens who enjoy the pain and suffering of those in the courtroom and of the convicts.
B. Towards the end of his essay, he writes with direct diction to contrast his Irony. He states directly what he believes needs changing. One of Orwell’s changes is to “Never use a long word where a short one will do” (9). The concise rule to ‘keep it simple’ shows the audience how clear wording is so much nicer and more understandable than the lump of complex words used in modern language. In expressly saying, “Never,” Orwell uses word choice to be resolute about how unacceptable language abuses are. His audience now sees the difference in the styles of writing, and therefore why their needs to be
The thesis of this essay is that it is necessary for people to learn the correct habits of writing because the common mistakes we make in writing can be weapons or disguise in political language to cover facts or secrets politicians do want to directly state. Orwell actually states his thesis statement in both the beginning and ending part of the essay. In paragraph 2, Orwell presents his thesis when he mentions the purpose of this essay: “now, it is clear that the decline of a language must ultimately have political and economic causes...but an effect can become a cause, reinforcing the original cause and producing the same effect in an intensified form...indefinitely”. At the final paragraph of the essay, Orwell states his thesis statement
The author began the essay with his perspective on British domination. He stated that it is evil and alongside of that it is oppressive. He felt hatred and guilt toward himself and the Burma people. He used allegories to describe the experience of the British imperialism and his own view of the matter. The audience became more aware of Orwell’s mental state is drawn to his pathos appeal as the essay continue in the story. Orwell describes the scene of the killing of an elephant in the British controlled island in the Caribbean. The authors used multiple techniques to express the feeling and irony in the story. The story eventually leading to a satirical demonstration of British domination. Orwell convicted the audience that the British are controlling imperialism does not negative impact on Burma people. He is well-known authors and political satirist.
The white overloads continued to reign supreme as they expected the colonial subjects to avidly embrace the violent, debasing imperialist desires. However, the quixotic Englishmen that did venture into these unknown lands to civilize the natives became internally torn. George Orwell dehumanized a man as an alibi to his killing, but still understood the natives’ attitudes as reasonable. Yet, this mutually shared distaste for each other both fueled and necessitated a barrier between the two cultures. This dual society painted a portrait of high tension and developed repercussions of calls of injustice and uprisings that eventually expelled the British Empire from India and Africa and gave the nations self-dominion.
Lawrence Hill 's The Book of Negroes is a heart wrenching tale that highlights the horrors of the transatlantic slave trade. The push to abolish the slave trade, called the abolitionist movement, was headlined by the London Committee. This movement plays a crucial role in The Book of Negroes; they are the reason Aminata is able to go home to Africa and how she comes to tell her story. However, the information Hill gives the reader about the abolitionist movement must be looked at critically, as the novel is a work of fiction. While Lawrence Hill makes a clear attempt to accurately depict the abolitionist movement in The Book of Negroes, there are several areas where he deviated from history.
...l parts of the lives of the oppressed and the oppressor. None can escape it. However, the oppression is felt more strongly by the black masses, who are denied equality and made to suffer many injustices that should have never came into being. Wright wants the reader to come to realize that Bigger is a tragic responsibility of American society and culture, which are racist and cruel. The white world is obviously domineering and unwilling to give up power so that the “lesser people” rise in status. Moreover, Bigger represents a tragedy of American innovation, of a culture that is so greedy for power and wealth that they will deny liberty to others and make them suffer at the expense of selfish success. Wright also warns the reader that there are many Biggers among every oppressed mass throughout the world who are merely one catalyst away from erupting just as he did.
...upporting imperialism and the motivations behind their actions. Orwell, by admitting that his motive for killing the innocent beast was brought on by his own will to avoid humiliation at the hands of the locals means that Orwell is able to recognize the. With Orwell the oppression of the British on the Burmese people caused direct harm to Orwell. It is because of this cruelty found in humans that Orwell places emphasis in his essay on the unjustified violence inflicted on the elephant, who wrongly received judgement from the imperialistic response of Orwell to combat his own inner demons with the locals.
One of Orwell’s distinctive characteristics is his emphasis of his emotional response to life and death in every situation. Orwell engages readers in his pieces because they feel that they can sit back and imagine what is going on in every situation through the narrator’s eyes. Every sentence is a new description that touches the audience’s emotions. In “A Hanging,” Orwell describes the death sentence scene by stating, “gripping the prisoner more closely than ever, they half led, half pushed him to the gallows and helped him clumsily up the ladder. Then the hangman climbed up and fixed the rope round the prisoner’s neck” (Orwell: A Hanging). Orwell’s perspective on the scene was that the prisoner was slowly walking to his death in a torturous way. He focuses on the sadness he feels versus other people’s perspectives and feelings. It seems that Orwell does not take death easily, so he uses evocative words to describe the trauma through his eyes. In “Shooting an Elephant,”Orwell’s point of view is that killing the elephant will not only hurt the animal, but it will destroy his own pride as a reluctant shooter. He looks at the big picture, but he also identifies with the subj...