Chris Mccandless Argument Essay

566 Words2 Pages

While reading “ Into the Wild” by Jon Krakauer, many opinions can be formed of Chris McCandless. One, in particular, was the author's opinion which he blatantly stated on page 85. He didn't think that Chris was some reckless foolish insane idiot. He believed that competent otherwise he wouldn't have lasted so long. I agree with Krakauer, things Chris did on this journey did not show signs of some careless person. Chris was just an adventurer looking to get away from the expectations society had of him to see the world for what it really was.
While on this trip Chris met nice people willing to let him stay with them such as Jan Burres and Wayne Westerberg. Keeping them at an arm's length Chris made sure not to get too close to them, trying to avoid them forming any expectations of him and emotions, he would leave with not so much as a goodbye. He wasn’t foolish this was just comfortable for him, tired of being cubed into the status quo society held for him, he found a way out. Chris also went two years without speaking a word to his sister who was described as the closest person to him. This goes back to him not wanting to carry any emotional baggage with him, it's not that he was insane he knew exactly what he was doing as he did it. Chris was just done with the standards of society. …show more content…

When Chris piled his one hundred twenty dollars and burned it, I believe that was another way of him separating himself from society. Most people look at the fact that he burned all his money as if he was crazy for doing it, but I see it as another way of him separating from society. He wasn't materialistic so the money really meant nothing to him but another tie to society. The last note Chris wrote before he died stated that he lived a happy, he lived a happy life because he lived it how he wanted and didn't let anyone stop him. Chris didn't have a death wish but was willing to meet it head on with a the risk he took to be

Open Document