Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie's 'The Danger Of A Single Story'

1025 Words3 Pages

Some could argue that what we call history’s main focus is: the white man’s history. This is easily argued by observing what we learn about in school: the triangular trade, the Roman Empire and the First World War. What does these three historical events have in common? They all tell the story of the white man and to some degree how this white man was always the superior one. By using the term “we” one quickly realizes that it deals with the Western society. This particular society quickly developed its own monoculture in which a collective memory was created of how history is perceived. We are therefore easily forgetting that Western history is not the only story to be told. This assignment will analyze and comment on Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie’s TED talk “The danger of a single story” from 2009. The key focus in the analysis is how the author engages the audience and on her use of the term “a single story”. In her speech Adichie talks about how her own life experiences made her realize how the Western society to a great extent bases its view on Africa through …show more content…

She starts at home in Nigeria unfamiliar with the discussed issue. She then travels to the USA and here she obtains this knowledge, she grows up, and brings it home. Using the fairytale-construction a relationship is build between herself and her audience; they get to know her and eventually have compassion for her. This relationship triggers certain emotions, which shows that pathos is also used to engage the audience. Adichie’s main claim is: Western literature has created a made-up single story of how Africa is. Her argumentation is very one-sided because she doesn’t use any rebuttal; no example is mentioned where a white man knows better than to believe the single story. On the other hand, she uses a lot of backing. Her speech portrays the extreme. This could possibly be used on purpose as; exaggeration promotes the

Open Document