Chen Duxiu's The Constitution And Confucianism

1799 Words4 Pages

In Chen Duxiu’s The Constitution and Confucianism, he criticises the institutionalisation of Confucianism in Chinese society as the primary state ideology, effectively prohibiting alternative schools of thought. Instead, he champions the Western civilisations’ concepts of equality and human rights, which allow for the freedom of thought without privileging the beliefs of any particular group. Such a critique of society seems reminiscent of Hannah Arendt’s Thinking and Moral Considerations, which posits that the imposition of a definite code of conduct on society leads to a passive and unthinking obedience which is conducive for the growth of wickedness. If one applies Arendt’s concepts of thinking as morality to Chen’s critique, it seems that …show more content…

Chen lambasts the institutionalisation of Confucianism on a country consisting of “four hundred million people of various religions” as “despotic in learning and thought” (Chen, p. 69). Within this claim lies an implicit critique of this Confucian hegemony as being immoral because it effectively bans the private practice of any alternative ethical systems from the variety of other religions and beliefs present in China. Given that such an imposition automatically assumes the superiority of Confucianism over other schools of thought in China, Chen’s critique can be corroborated by Arendt’s argument that non-thinking and its consequent potential for evil is easily facilitated by the provision of “prescribed rules of conduct…at a given time in a given society” (Arendt, p. 26). She posits that a dictator-like implementation of any system of beliefs such as Confucianism in a society would condition its people to become complacent in “get[ting] used to never making up their minds” by merely obeying whatever system has been instituted rather than critically evaluating their merits and ramifications (Ibid.). Since Arendt argues that conscious and continuous thinking is necessary for at least the absence of evil, it is thus arguable that China’s imposition of Confucianism is problematic …show more content…

Yet, one must still keep Arendt’s arguments for thinking in mind to ascertain if Chen’s proposal could likewise fall into a trap of non-thinking. Chen argues that the institutionalisation of Confucianism clashes with the Confucians’ desire to import the model of Western civilisation into China because such a model is not compatible with the rigid hierarchy Confucianism promotes (Chen, p. 73). The Western model believes that “every person is equal before the law…without any distinction between superior and inferior” (Chen, p. 70), which keeps society fair and just because no one will be discriminated against on the basis of their different beliefs. Confucianism thus contradicts this model because it promotes “a system of hierarchy between the noble and the base” which results in “an unequal morality” (Chen, 71). Confucianism’s ethical code of conduct is naturally unfair because it prioritises the role of ritual which discriminates based on one’s status and relationship to another. However, Chen’s rather vague approach here in refuting Confucianism may likewise be rooted in a form of non-thinking. Chen appears to view the Western “faith in equality and human rights” as an all-encompassing solution to Confucianism’s ills by simply advocating for China to “import the foundation of a Western style

Open Document