Charlie Gordon In Flowers For Algernon

587 Words2 Pages

In the novel "Flowers for Algernon", the main character, Charlie Gordon undergoes an experimental operation to elevate his intelligence because of his mental disorder. Charlie’s intelligence level essentially skyrocketed after the surgery, his outlook on life changed notably. In terms of his happiness ironically ,these changes are not positive which shows that happiness is not directly proportional with intelligence.
Happiness is difined as a sense of content. The happiness of a person can be destroyed if the ongoing order of that person is changed or disturbed. In the novel Charlie is a 37 year old man who is mentally retarted but still functional. A statement such as "Im gonna try awful hard" was often spoken by Charlie which showed that …show more content…

Because of his childish nature he sees the people around him as well intended as he is. Therefor he cannot see people’s negative intentions towards himself. With the rise in Charlie’s mental abilities he also becomes more self-conscious, with a greater sensitivity to how others see him. For this reason, he demands that Alice should not see him any longer because he realized that the positive effects of the operation will soon wear off and then his relationship will no longer be as it was. This leaves him with little dignity which makes him willing to give up his most edifying relationship ever to preserve what is left of it. The old Charlie never would have thought of things that way after undergoing the operation, with his expanded ability to see beyond the exterior and into the true incitement of other people, he finally sees that he has been an entity of derision by others, who he previously thought of as his friends. Intelligence brought sadness to Charlie rather than happiness opposed to what he anticipated. This leads Charlie to the following declaration: “I don’t know what’s worse: to not know what you are and be happy, or to become what you’ve always wanted to be, and feel alone” which shows that intelligence doesn’t define a persons

Open Document