Charles Ponzi Fraud Research Paper

841 Words2 Pages

Any con man can work a simple scam, but you have to be a special kind of swindler to have your name become interchangeable with the word fraud. Charles Ponzi made it happen, having his legacy live on forever. Arriving in the Unites States from Italy in 1903, Ponzi was unsuccessful in a variety of unskilled jobs that usually ended when he got into trouble for theft or cheating customers. Ponzi wanted to find a way to make large sums of cash fast. Ponzi found his get rich quick scheme using the postal system. In the early 1900’s, it was common for letters sent to foreign countries to include an international reply coupon. This reply coupon was a certificate that could be exchanged for minimum postage back to the country from which the letter …show more content…

Unfortunately, Ponzi became greedy. He began to recruit investors into his system with the promise of fifty-percent profit returns in just a very short amount of time. Investors would pay Ponzi their cash and he would pay them their promised return. Ponzi’s investors were very happy with his results and word started to spread about this Italian financial genius. In just two years, he had employees all over the country recruiting new investors for his creative business. Ponzi was making millions. At the height of his wealth, Ponzi was making up to $250,000 a …show more content…

Sometimes Ponzi did not even pay off the old investors, since many of them would reinvest their returns. Eventually, experienced financial authorities started to look at Ponzi's business. Clarence Barron, who was the owner of the Wall Street Journal, realized Ponzi must be swindler. Barron did recognize that there was probably was a way for a Ponzi to make a quick buck on the postal reply coupon scheme, he calculated that Ponzi would be moving one-hundred-sixty-million coupons to make the amount of cash he needed to support his business. Since there were only twenty-seven-thousand postal reply coupons circulating in the entire world, Ponzi's story did not check out. Also, the Postal Service reported that there was not a huge flow of reply coupons from Italy to the United States. Ponzi dug another hole for himself when he told newspapers he invested cash in real estate, stocks, and bonds like any normal investor. Barron asked the very obvious question here: if Ponzi had this foolproof scheme in which he could make a fifty-percent profit, why was Ponzi putting his money into traditional investments that would yield him a much lower return? This did not sound like the actions of a financial genius. Barron's story ran as front-page news in the Boston Post in July 1920, which would have been the doom

Open Document