Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Romeo and juliet character analysis
The character of tybalt romeo and juliet
Romeo's character analysis in Romeo and Juliet
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Romeo and juliet character analysis
Character Essay – Tybalt
“What, drawn, and talk of peace? I hate the word, as I hate hell, all Montagues, and thee. Have at thee, coward!” This is a very telling line from Tybalt, a character from Romeo and Juliet, Shakespeare’s highly acclaimed Romantic Tragedy. Tybalt Capulet, ‘Prince of Cats’ (the cousin of Juliet) is violent young man, and acts as the foil, or opposite, of Benvolio. Tybalt has many negative attributes, like arrogance and aggressiveness, but perhaps the cause for this is the fact that loyalty and bravery are two of his strongest traits, and combined with the harsh environment of war, bloodshed and inter-family feud that he was brought up in, it was perhaps inevitable for Tybalt to turn into the most hateful and despised antagonist of this iconic
…show more content…
“Boy, this shall not excuse the injuries that thou hast done me. Therefore turn and draw.” Tybalt says this to Romeo, as he is always ready for a fight. Tybalt’s bravery allows him to confront his enemies with confidence and self-assuredness, which is where his arrogance stems from. Alas, Tybalt does not use this bravery for good, to stand up to the two rival houses and bring peace, but to provoke it, shedding more blood, including that of the innocent. This is another example of how Tybalt reflects the theme of hate in Romeo and Juliet. His courage to put his own life at stake, in one sense, could be seen as ignorance – unable to see the stupidity of the situation he finds himself and his family in – a blood feud, the origins, and thus the meaning, or purpose, of it, lost in time. It is pointless. There are many such people in our world today – there always have been. Misguided beliefs and prejudice renders them unable to see the good in others and how much better the world would be without war. Indeed, Shakespeare helps us to understand that this mentality is wrong and has no purpose but
In the Shakespearean play, Romeo & Juliet, aggression is represented in different ways by the different characters in the play. Tybalt, Romeo, Benvolio, and the others all have their own way of dealing with hate and anger. Some do nothing but hate while others can’t stand to see even the smallest of quarrels take place.
When asked by Benvolio to make peace in the streets, Tybalt bluntly responds,” talk of peace, I hate the word. As I hate hell all Montagues.” This is the attitude of Tybalt throughout the play. He believes he is doing all for the best and uses violence as his tool. He gets angry at the ball with Romeo being there, “villain as a guest,” and believes it best to defend his family’s honor by later taking revenge. When Tybalt finds Romeo, he thinks it best to fight him and when he ends up killing Mercutio he believes he has done his duty by causing Romeo the same hurt he has brought Tybalt, “the injuries that thou hast done me.”
Romeo and Juliet is the tragic story of two young, “star-crossed” lovers from feuding families, destined for disaster. The Capulets and the Montagues have an ancient grudge on one another that has been passed down over generations. Unfortunately, Romeo and Juliet end up victims of their families’ vicious loathing. Romeo and Juliet’s story has several intertwining themes such as the aforementioned hatred between the Capulets and Montagues and the revenge Romeo strives for after his friend Mercutio’s death. Also, the love and passion between Romeo and Juliet and the loyalty of Romeo and his friends. Honour and revenge also feature frquently throughout the play including Juliet’s pressure to honour her family, and the revenge Romeo sees as his duty when Tybalt kills Mercutio.
Romeo, enraged at the killing of one of his dearest friends, challenges Tybalt to a fight for revenge, saying:
In conclusion, the irony is that their love, and death, was able to do what their lives could not, to end the feuding between the Montague’s and the Capulet’s. It is with this thought that I shall examine “the thin line between love and hate” which is evidently shown on many occasions, such as when Romeo uses his love for Juliet to remove his hate for Tybalt “Tybalt, the reason that I have to love thee doth much excuse the appertaining rage” and also the play itself is evident of this, Romeo and Juliet’s love was so strong for each other, that they were able to overcome hate and also the hate that others possessed towards each other.
Shakespeare’s play is about two families that hate each other for no obvious reason. This fight has dragged on for a long time in Verona, Italy where the play is set. In Verona there are public disturbances between the two families, Capulets and Montagues. It became such a problem that the prince announces “I have an interest in your hate’s proceeding, / My blood for your rude brawls doth lie a bleeding;” (Romeo and Juliet 3:1: 186-87). The families’ feud creates a creepy and dismal atmosphere in Verona, and this leads the Prince to promulgate the rule with both families. Public disturbances will not happen again and if it does then they will take any fighter’s lives in front of those both families. As the reader may notice, the Capulets and the Montagues’ hatred and indignation grew as the feuds escalated. At the Capulet’s party, Tybalt does not accept Romeo being a part of the party saying “I will not endure him” (Romeo and Juliet, 1: 5: 76) and convinces Capulet to drive Romeo out of the room. Although, Capulet accepts Romeo to enjoy the party, “He shall be endured./ What, goodman boy! I say he shall. Go to!”(Romeo and Juliet, 1: 5: 77-78). However, at the end of the play both families finally realize that they have done something wr...
The sharp clangs of the shiny, metal swords sound throughout the still air. One sword is fueled by burning anger, while the other is merely moving in self-defense, not choosing to cause such a racket. There is always going to be people in the world who are nothing alike… and many times those people don’t get along. A prime example of this is Tybalt and Benvolio, two characters in one of the world's most well-known tragedies. In William Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet, Benvolio, a kindhearted peacemaker, and Tybalt, an impulsive swordsman, are character foils because of how their opposite traits complement each other.
This hatred causes many brawls including one in Act 3 scene 1. This brawl is a pawn of fate that pulls Romeo further apart from Juliet. In this scene Tybalt is upset because he believes that Romeo had crashed the Capulet ball, though in reality he had no harmful intentions. He is blood thirsty and wants to battle Romeo. Romeo is Mad, passionate and hasty. He is already symbolically dead and Mercutio and Benvolio believe that he is in no state of mind to fight, and if he were to do so he would not stand a chance against Tybalt, the prince of cats. Mercutio Is worried about this so in his attempt to protect Romeo he fights Tybalt which unleashes a big fight. Tybalt kills Mercutio. This upsets Romeo so much that he kills Tybalt because he was overwhelmed with passion and makes a hasty decision. Now bringing things back to the Capulet ball. Fate begins with Tybalt hearing Romeo express his love for Juliets beauty aloud and becomes filled with anger because he believes that Romeo is there to crash party since he is a Montague. If Tybalt never heard that, he would have never instigated a fight and Romeo would not have been exiled. This is fate rearranging time and circumstance to pull Romeo farther away from
Tybalt uses gentle expressions such as ‘love’ only to sharply accuse Romeo if a villain. Although somewhat insignificant, this sentence structure adds to the cruelty that Tybalt portrays. Romeo does not want to fight and explains reasons as to why, however Tybalt will not accept that he is not fighting someone and Mercutio gives Tybalt the perfect reason and opportunity to start a fight. Shakespeare seems to want the audience to sees Tybalt’s urge to pick fights as a big reason for the tragedy.
Now, Romeo has been banished from the land of Verona, away from his sweet Juliet. When Juliet learns of Tybalt’s death by the hand of Romeo, she first states “my husband lives, that Tybalt would have slain” with Romeo as the focal point (3.3.115). In the next line, she reiterates this same idea by stating, “and Tybalt’s dead, that would have slain my husband” with Tybalt as the focal point (3.3.116-117). This reiteration of the same idea from two different perspectives, facilitates a sense of logic and illustrates how Juliet is attempting to connect the dots and make sense of all that she has just been informed of in regards to how she should feel towards Romeo. As Juliet’s family is in mourning of Tybalt and is crying over his corpse, Juliet tells her nurse that her tears will not be caused by the death of her cousin but by the banishment of her beloved husband, Romeo. The imagery used in the line “wash they his wound with tears,” generates a sense of great mourning by quantitating the amount of grief that the Capulet family is experiencing in response to Tybalt’s death to the number of tears that they are crying, which is so much that their tears could wash Tybalt’s wounds (3.3.141). In this instance,
In Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet, the audience witnesses a great amount of familial pride when Tybalt shouts to an opposing family member, “What, drawn, and talk of peace? I hate the word, as I hate hell, all Montagues, and thee. Have at thee, coward,” (Shakespeare, Romeo and Juliet, Act 1.1 pg 12). In the play Romeo and Juliet, Shakespeare depicts two feuding families who once had a legitimate reason to be mad at one another, but now continuously fight each other fueled purely by family pride. This everlasting conflict between the Montagues and the Capulets illustrate to the audience how having too much family pride places a restriction on familial unity.
Another episode of fate, or rather dramatic irony, happens when Romeo somehow misses getting a letter from Tybalt Capulet, his enemy, challenging him to a duel. Romeo, unknowing of the tragic letter sent to him, but not gotten, goes to tell his friends of his beautiful bride, but, in return, comes face-to-face with none other than Tybalt, his loathed enemy, the kin to his new bride, Juliet. As soon as Romeo shows up, though, he is greeted by Tybalt’s insults, calling him a villain, but instead of stepping up to Tybalt’s challenge, though, Romeo backs down, saying, “Tybalt, the reason that I have to love thee doth much excuse the appertaining rage to such a greeting. Villain I am none. Therefore farewell. I see thou knowest not me.” After harsh words are spoken, families are disgraced, and names are scorned, Romeo finally just backs away. Mercutio, though, cannot let his man be put to disgrace, so he decides to defend Romeo’s name.
Shakespeare shows throughout the play how the characters continue to forgive the ones they love, even in the harsh circumstances. Angered by the death of his good friend Mercutio, Romeo slays Tybalt. “This gentleman, the Prince’s near ally, /My friend, hath got this mortal hurt In my behalf-my reputation stained /With Tybalt’s slander-Tybalt, that an hour /Hath been my cousin.”(3, 1, 104-108). Juliet could have been very angry with Romeo since Tybalt was her cousin but she was more heartbroken over Romeo’s exile. Shakespeare displays that Juliet’s love for Romeo overpowered the hate she had for him killing Tybalt. In addition, Shakespeare displayed that love conquers hate through the relationship between Juliet and her father, Lord Capulet. Near the end of the play Capulet told Juliet that she had ...
Hasty actions created by mankind's careless actions throughout history. They are people who don’t think through about their decisions properly, tend to make more mistakes. Written by William Shakespeare, Romeo and Juliet are about two young, star-crossed lovers who are secretly in love with each other. However, they have found themselves facing obstacles left and right, and have very few allies on their side. They’re thrown into these challenges because Mercutio wanted to protect Romeo’s pride, however, Tybalt intervenes and challenges Romeo to a duel, but Romeo doesn’t want to fight Tybalt. Thus, Mercutio decides to take the challenge upon himself and duels with Tybalt. Nonetheless, Mercutio, Tybalt, and Romeo’s thoughtless action had brought upon grief and trouble into the feuding families throughout the play.
In the first act of Shakespeare's play, Tybalt, who is a member of the Capulet family, is upset at Benvolio, who is a member of the Montague family. Benvolio has drawn his sword in order to "keep the peace" (Shakespeare 1.1). Tybalt's hatred toward the Montague family can be seen in the following passage to Benvolio: "What, drawn, and talk of peace! I hate the word, / As I hate hell, all Montagues, and thee [. . .]" (Shakespeare 1.1). Samuel Taylor Coleridge suggests that "Tybalt is a man abandoned to h...