Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Public perception of disability
Public perception of disability
Negative effects of stereotypes in modern day society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Public perception of disability
How often during one day do you hear peers using offensive terms in casual language? Today's society has gotten into the habit of using certain words as adjectives. There has been a current movement to end the use of terms related to race, gender and sexual orientation in popular culture. But there is still a large accumulation of offensive language that the public needs to be educated on.
The figure to the left points out only eight commonly used adjectives that can be offensive to different groups of people. It is commonly understood that people who use this offensive language do not intend to demean a group of people, but that is often the case. I will be focusing on the use of the word retarded, which is something I do not go a day without
…show more content…
In the past decade many disability groups have chosen to replace MR with different language. The Arc, the primary family advocacy organization for people with intellectual disabilities, ended their use of MR in 2004 stating it "was offensive to many people." The American Association for Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (AAIDD), the primary professional organization for people with disabilities, also using people first language.
Overtime, there has been a trend of the change in language used when speaking about people with disabilities. Terms such as moron, idiocy and imbecile, are no longer accepted in the disabilities community. But these are also terms that have come to be used in popular culture. There is a difference between these terms and retarded it though. These terms were commonly used as diagnoses and slang in the early and mid-20th century. In 1975 MR became a classification for special education, and continued to be used until the late 1990s. It was not until slang for MR began being used in popular culture that advocates saw its negative
…show more content…
Researchers found that current generations have began using it as slang for fun, such as "acting retarded" when you are intoxicated. Though this may not be considered as having a negative attitude towards people with disabilities, I still believe it may have negative repercussions towards the emotions of people with disabilities.
In an interview with CNN, Ellen Seidman, said that hearing the r-word makes her worry for her 9-year-old son Max, who has cerebral palsy. She worries that people will not respect her son when they associate that word with his intellectual disability. She understands that most people are not using the word to demean people with disabilities, but she points out that many do not understand that it merely implies the idea that people with disabilities are stupid or losers.
In the end, there is a long list of derogatory terms that are used in current popular culture. Using slang to compare oneself or someone else to someone with a diagnosed disability, disorder or impairment is degrading to that group of people. This is another way that current society continues to belittle people with disabilities, though many are unaware of the effects their attitudes or actions may have. Disability advocates, such as people who have signed the End the R-Word campaign, are working to build awareness and teach society the sting that comes with the
The language has been used in writing before and many books use this type of language so they can build a connection to the real world. It is vital for teens especially in 8th grade and above to learn how important it is to stray away from these potentially hurtful words and how this type of language can set a certain tone to a
As human beings, we like to make sure never to offend or judge anyone. We even have sayings like “never judge a book by its cover”. A metaphor that is often said whenever trying not to judge someone based on their outward appearance; however, it is not often that people practice what they preach. We judge people based on external factors within seconds. Even though we know what people see on the outside is not a defining factor or who we are as people. Nancy Mairs, author of On Being a Cripple, has to live through this every day. She knows this truth very well, and lives proudly with the fact that as she is disabled. Mairs is admirable for choosing to call herself a “cripple” and not be ashamed of it. Though the word is derogatory and a word that is avoided by society, Mairs identifies herself as a cripple because that is what she is. In explaining her disability, she says, “I haven’t always been crippled, ... to be whole of limb is ... infinitely more pleasant and useful. and if that knowledge leaves me open to bitterness … the physical soundness I once enjoyed is well worth the occasional stab of regret” (Mairs 186). What really
With the growing support to ban the word “retard” more and more people have come to the defence of both sides. Patricia Bauer’s “A Movie, a Word and My Family’s Battle” and Christopher Fairman’s “The Case Against Banning the Word ‘Retard’ ” are 2 such examples. Patricia Bauer, a mother of a mentally disabled child, and Christopher Fairman, a professor at the Moritz College of Law at the Ohio State University, have two completely different ideas on weather is should be banned. Bauer argues to ban it, while Fairman is against banning it. Thanks to Christopher Fairman’s good reasoning and convincing evidence, trustworthy tone, and use of background information, his points come across stronger and lead to a better argument.
In the modern society, millions of people realize that several offensive words with insulting taboo meanings heavily disturb their daily lives and break some special groups of people’s respect to push them to feel like outsiders of the whole society. As a result, more and more people join some underway movements to eliminate the use of these offensive words in people’s everyday speech and writing. However, these offensive words themselves are not the culprit, the bad meanings people attach are the problems and some other functions of the words are useful in the society. Christopher M. Fairman the author of “ Saying It Is Hurtful, Banning It Is Worse” also argues that although
In “A Movie, A Word, and My Family’s Battle,” by Patricia Bauer makes an emotional argument that you cannot use the word “retard”, no matter how you mean it, without offending a large group of people while also setting back years of progress.
The author writes, "People–crippled or not–wince at the world "cripple", as they do not at "handicapped" or "disabled." (Perhaps I want them to wince. I want them to see me as a tough customer, one whom the fates/gods/viruses have not been kind, but who can face the brutal truth of her existence squarely. As a cripple, I swagger." (194) This quote shows the author's strength and sense of humor. These are the two things which allow her to honestly face the truth of her situation as well as how other people react to it. She does not want pity from people who see her limping down the street with her cane, nor does she want them to shy away as though she is some ...
In the article, “Freaks and Queer” by Eli Clare, the author discusses the meaning of certain words that are used to describe individuals with disabilities such as “queer”, “retard”, “cripple” and how they provide him with a sense of pride and strength. He also discusses the history of freakdom, and describes the horrid treatments of many disabled people who were not only objectified but also mistreated by the public in freak shows. Hence, Clare does not yet identifies nor associates himself with the word “freak”, due to its negative implications (Clare,
Bissoondath says, that these terms are not easy to use or not easy to describe. They hurt people in every decent way. He stated in his story, once he met a person who said racial words to describe a particular race. Although, he says that the use of those kinds of words are not always indication of disapproval of their comfort wi...
To achieve this goal, I compelled my family to join my practices. I informed my brother that instead of using the r-word, he should say nothing at all if he is using it in the incorrect context, or say “an individual with an intellectual disability” if he intends to use it in the correct context. Even though the r-word had a place within a medical context, it has become tainted by its recurring use, to denigrate others. Even political figures have become attuned to the outdatedness of the word. For example, President Obama signed Rosa's Law: a bill regarding wording in federal health, education, and labor policy that replaces "mentally retarded" with "intellectual disability" and "mental retardation" as "individual with an intellectual disability." This sort of people-first language has inspired me to take action among my friends and family. Although President Obama opened the door for awareness, I believe that the next step to end the r-word should come on a personal level. Those who are aware of the cruelty associated with the r-word need to have the courage to stand up and fight against its
Kathie Snow believed that other people’s attitude towards others is the greatest obstacle facing people with disabilities. According to Kathie Snow (2010), “The real problem is never a person’s disability, but the attitudes of others! A change in our attitudes leads to changes in our actions. Attitudes drive actions” (P. 2). I completely agree with Kathie Snow in this regard because this is more than just language; it is the attitudes we have towards
Eli Clare in Freaks and Queers observes how individuals use certain words to reaffirm their identities and also distinguish themselves from the rest of society. Being a disabled transman, Clare mentions various words, like handicapped, cripple (crip), gimp, amongst others, which have come to be accepted by the disabled community. He says, “cripple makes me flinch…but I love crip humor, the audacity of turning cripple into a word of pride” (p. 83). Some of these words, like queer for the LGBT community, are used as a means of agency and community for minority groups. But he also turns to the ugly side of language, which can be used to decrease and erase the worth of an individual. He mentions his discomfort with the word ‘freak’ and how
Most people feel relatively uncomfortable when they meet someone with an obvious physical disability. Usually, the disability seems to stand out in ones mind so much that they often forget the person is still a person. In turn, their discomfort is likely to betray their actions, making the other person uncomfortable too. People with disabilities have goals, dreams, wants and desires similar to people without disabilities. Andre Dubus points out very clearly in his article, "Why the Able-bodied Still Don't Get It," how people's attitudes toward "cripples" effect them. It's is evident that although our society has come a long way with excepting those with physical disabilities, people do not understand that those with physical disabilities are as much human as the next person
She told her readers that she has a muscle-wasting disease and she could only move three fingers on her right hand. She wrote that the reactions she got from most people were “Decidedly negative” (Johnson p.98) She wrote that she would hear thing such as “I admire you for being out; most people would give up.” And “You don’t let the pain hold you back do you?” (Johnson p.98) There is often talk about how popular culture teaches people to both see and not see the people with disabilities. Comments such as these are an example of such blindness. When a child sees a disabled person a parent’s first reaction would be to tell them not to stare. We teach children that it is impolite to be curious about people who live life differently than others. We carry the “its-not-polite-to-stare” idea into adult hood therefore when we come across a disabled we try not to make eye contact not as if we are being rude but because we are taught that it would offend them. All curiosity and attempts to understand are shut down at a young age for fear of offending someone. Therefore, any attempt to encourage is met with a deep misunderstanding of how the life of someone with disabilities truly works. Just because a person has a disability does not mean they are incapable of enjoying
In this work Nancy Mairs, a woman with multiple sclerosis, discusses why she calls herself a cripple as opposed to the other names used by society to describe people with disabilities. She prefers the word “cripple” over the words “disabled” and “handicapped”. Nancy Mairs presents herself as a cripple using a straightforward tone, negative diction, repetition, and logical/ethical appeal.
Disability: Any person who has a mental or physical deterioration that initially limits one or more major everyday life activities. Millions of people all over the world, are faced with discrimination, the con of being unprotected by the law, and are not able to participate in the human rights everyone is meant to have. For hundreds of years, humans with disabilities are constantly referred to as different, retarded, or weird. They have been stripped of their basic human rights; born free and are equal in dignity and rights, have the right to life, shall not be a victim of torture or cruelty, right to own property, free in opinion and expression, freedom of taking part in government, right in general education, and right of employment opportunities. Once the 20th century