Case Study: Rocky Mountain Advanced Genome Inc

1768 Words4 Pages

Case Study: Rocky Mountain Advanced Genome Inc

In order to provide an accurate valuation of RMAG, the forecast horizon needs to reach the maturity stage the firm’s growth. The product that will take the longest to be marketed, Human Therapeutics is not expected to be earning revenues for RMAG for 4-7 years therefore to allow these products to reach their maturity in generating cash flows, a horizon for longer than 10 years is recommended. 15 years was used for this analysis to ensure that the terminal value of the company was determined when the company is mature not in the growth stage which could greatly skew results.

In order to forecast free cash flow, the first assumptions that had to be made were in regards to sales growth for RMAG;s products. As information regarding diagnostics and agriculture related products is limited and comparable companies are scarce, it was assumed that RMAG’s forecasts were slightly optimistic as to push firm value up therefore an average sales revenue was determined from RMAG and Big Sur’s forecasts. To forecast beyond 2005, sales growth per year was analysed historically and then used to extrapolate future sales until 2010. As the products will originally experience extremely high sales growth due to the unique nature of products, the growth will need to eventually slow to an industry average therefore this is demonstrated in the forecast proforma. Sales growth is expected to slow to 2.5-5%, the range of industry average to economy growth.

Human Therapeutics are expected to be the most lucrative portion of RMAG’s business however some discrepancies are evident between RMAG and Big Sur forecasts regarding when these revenues are expected to be realised. Comparatively, Human Genome Science...

... middle of paper ...

...tio multiple gave a valuation of RMAG which was much higher than the other two methods. This has meant that it has been given the lowest value in triangulation as not to skew the results. This skewed result is attributed to the company’s earnings being significantly higher than their competitors pushing up the price of the company.

Therefore using triangulation; the value of the firm was determined to be;

RMAG Valuation=(0.5) DCF Valuation+(0.4)Price to Book Ratio Multiple+(0.1)Price to Earnings Ratio Multiple

RMAG Valuation = $50.03 million

Therefore 90% of RMAG is valued at $45.03 million.

This valuation of RMAG is slightly lower than the $46 million asked by RMAG management. This can be due to a number of aforementioned sensitivities to this valuation of RMAG. Based on RMAG’s original forecast, the DCF approach has offered the most accurate valuation of RMAG.

More about Case Study: Rocky Mountain Advanced Genome Inc

Open Document