Capital Gains Tax Case Study

520 Words2 Pages

Norman acquired his main residence in Melbourne in April 2016, incurring a cost for the acquisition and legal and stamp duty costs. A year later, he incurred an additional cost in converting a part of his home (two of six rooms) suitable for his hairdressing business. The Capital Gains Tax (CGT) implications on these transactions are discussed below.
Section 118-110 of ITAA97 states that a tax-payer is entitled to a full CGT main residence exemption if the tax-payer is an individual and if the dwelling was acquired after 20 September 1985 and if it was the aforesaid tax-payer’s main residence during the period of ownership. However, if the dwelling was used for the purpose of producing assessable income and a CGT event occurs, the tax-payer will be entitled to a partial exemption only under s 118-190 of ITAA97. …show more content…

Norman acquiring his residence creates a CGT event (D1) under ITAA97 s 104-35(1) and the time of the CGT event is when he bought it, which is April 2016. Norman, being the tax-payer is an individual and has used his dwelling since he acquired it for an entire year before he started using his residence for his hairdressing business. For this reason, he is not entitled to a full main residence exemption, but a partial exemption under ITAA97 s 118-190. Since it was established that a CGT event occurred and that a part of his residence was utilised for his business, a portion of the proceeds will be accounted for as a capital gain or loss under s 118-110 of ITAA97. For this purpose, the proportion of the residence that was used for the hairdressing business (2 out of 6 rooms) and the period for which the residence was used for income-producing purposes (2 out of 15 months) will be

More about Capital Gains Tax Case Study

Open Document