CRG Case Study

1051 Words3 Pages

To successfully provide a well rounded analysis and recommendation for the communication issue being experienced in CRG, it is important to first identify the nature and cause of this problem
4.2.1. Motivation
Being human, validation in the form motivation is essential to help propel our performance in both competitive and non-competitive environments. Motivation can be described as the driving force which allows individuals to achieve their goals.

According to the performance expectancy model proposed by Porter and Lawler (1968) (citied in Brooks, 2009) a perception of reward influence by intrinsic or extrinsic can help boost motivation. Intrinsic describes the motivation that’s driven by personal interest in the task while extrinsic motivation describes individuals that require external stimulus like higher wages to achieve their goals. Applying this theory to CRG, the employees in the US appear to be motivated mainly by extrinsic factors, thus wanting to reach the highest level possible, increase their pay bracket or get promoted as fast as possible. These factors coupled with the working environment, status of the company provide job satisfaction, results in employees staying in the company from as little as 2 to 20 years.

The Director in the US reinforces the presence of managerial authority within CRG. These Directors are seen to praise and motivate the employees through gestures like bringing in snacks for the workers or emailing praises. This encourages friendly competition between the employees, and ensures the team work to the best of their abilities. After speaking to team members in the Indian office, there seems to be a lack of direction. With no physical presence of an individual of high hierarchical authorit...

... middle of paper ...

...cromanaged.

The PD team in NY is managed by a Director with over 15 years of experience and has a participative leadership style. On the other hand, the Director managing the IT team is located in the US while the in situ Manager is a much lower ranking employee with a position as an Associate who does not have the level of insight or experience as would a high ranking employee. This causes the Head Manager for the IT team to use a more delegative style of leadership constrains such as the time difference make it difficult to active monitor the work done by the IT team. Due to the low rank of the acting Manager of the IT team, a more authoritative style is used which can de-motivate team or create hostility and conflict within the team due to the short levels of seniority amongst the team members as a result affects their interaction with the PD team in the US.

Open Document