Bystander's Three Options Essay

1027 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Killing vs letting die pas

In Thomson’s Bystander Two Options case the ethical question of killing versus letting die is at debate. From previous studies it has been found that the popular opinion agrees that it is ethically acceptable to let someone die but not acceptable to kill someone. In Thomson’s case the bystander must choose the action of killing one innocent person which my seem “right” or letting five innocent people die. In the case there happens to be a random bystander on the trolley track right at the switch that can change the course of the trolley at any moment. If the bystander turns the switch to the right one workman will die but the bystander would be saving five workmen straight ahead on the track. The bystander has two options: option one, doing …show more content…

In Bystander’s Three Options again the bystander is at the switch that changes the course of the trolley track however this time the switch can be turned both to the left and to the right. If the bystander turns the switch to the right, then the trolley will turn onto the right track killing one workman. If the bystander turns it to the left, then the trolley will turn to the left track killing the bystander himself. Or, of course, the bystander can do nothing, letting the five workmen straight ahead die. The bystander finds himself with three options: option one, do nothing and let the five die, option two, turn the switch to the right and kill one person or option three, turn the switch to the left thereby killing himself. Thomson’s suggest that the popular opinion would be option two, killing the one workman to let the five live. However, Thomson says if you are not willing to self sacrifice so turning the switch to the left then you have no right to self sacrifice another person by turning the switch to the right. Conclusively deciding that killing is worse than letting die and in both Bystander’s Two and Three Options the bystander should not turn any switch and just let the five workmen die on the straight ahead

Show More
Related

  • PSY 301, Introductory Psychology, Fall 2005, Exam 4 A

    4398 Words  | 9 Pages

    The bystander effect refers to the tendency for an observer of an emergency to withhold aid if the:

    Read More

  • Bystander Effect: A Study on Group Apathy

    906 Words  | 2 Pages

    The bystander effect is a the phenomenon in which the more people are are around the less likely someone will step-in or help in a given situation. THe most prominent example of this is the tragic death of Kitty Genovese. In march of 1964 Kitty genovese was murdered in the alley outside of her apartment. That night numerous people reported hearing the desperate cries for help made by Kitty Genovese who was stabbed to death. Her screams ripped through the night and yet people walked idly by her murder. No one intervened and not even a measly phone call to the police was made.

    Read More

  • Miles Lehrman's Witness to the Holocaust Argues Whether Bystanders Affirm Perpetrators

    834 Words  | 2 Pages

    ... so is sacrificial to one’s rights, it puts them in an undesirable position where they may be harmed as well, and success at being an upstander is not guaranteed. Perpetrators tyrannize those who are unable to stand up for themselves; like how predators seek out the vulnerable preys. Hence, instead of having bystanders to stand up for the victim, the victim should stand up for him/herself. In addition, unlike what Lehrman believes, bystanders are not the most dangerous to the victim; the perpetrator is. Saying that bystanders are the most dangerous is is like saying that if one witnesses something, then he/she is a criminal. Consequently, saying that bystanders should stand up for victims against perpetrators is illogical and naive. Concisely, it is not another’s responsibility to ensure one’s safety and wellness; instead, it is one’s responsibility to do so.

    Read More

  • Morality and Heroism: A Philosophical Look at The Avengers

    1496 Words  | 3 Pages

    My question stems from the “The trolley problem” which gives a person the imaginary option of pulling a lever to save five people from an oncoming trolley and killing one person or letting the trolley go and kill the five people saving, that one other person. Another way this dilemma is set up is: say you were walking on a bridge with a fat man and you saw that a trolley was coming below you and was about to hit five people but, you knew if you pushed this fat man off the bridge to block the trolley then you could save the five people at the expense of the fat

    Read More

  • Judith Thomson Killing And Letting Die Problem Summary

    1063 Words  | 3 Pages

    Thomson goes on to present several scenarios that show how negative and positive duties cannot be the final assessment as to the morally of an action. In one such scenario Thomson hypothesizes that the five people on the track are workers who have full knowledge of the dangers their job presents and are paid hazard pay as compensation. In this scenario the second track has been out of service for years and the one person one the tracks was invited and had their safety guaranteed by the Mayor who just so happened to be the trolley conductor. In this situation it is clear that negative and positive duties hold no bearing, the conductor is obligated by his own word to kill the five. In addition, the five workers have no special claim over the one person against being killed because they are fully aware of the possibly that they can die at

    Read More

  • Similarities Between To Kill A Mockingbird And The Lottery

    288 Words  | 1 Pages

    Although people can fear an outcome of telling the truth or standing up for what they believe is right, being a bystander in a poor situation doesn’t exempt someone from innocence. Whether it involves a murder or telling the truth, if someone knows it is wrong and does nothing to take part in what’s going on they are no better than the ones involved in the conflict. In To Kill A Mockingbird by Harper Lee and The Lottery by Shirley Jackson, both stories involve bystanders. A bystander is not innocent when they do nothing about the problem going on around them.

    Read More

  • Who's Worse? The Dangers of Bystanders in Witness to the Holocaust

    621 Words  | 2 Pages

    All in all, if we do not stand up then we only affirm the perpetrators, and if there are too many that affirm perpetrators instead of standing up for the victim, bystanders can prove to be more dangerous than the perpetrators.

    Read More

  • Ethical Egoism: The Queen Vs. Dudley And Stevens

    550 Words  | 2 Pages

    A person who prescribes to the theory of ethical egoism would most likely analyze the situation in the following way. If the bystander did not act then it would have little impact on their life other than the emotional aspect of the deaths that occurred. Conversely, if the bystander did act by switching the train to the other track and killing another person they would be guilty of murder and this would have negative implications on their life and an ethical egoist would be less likely to take this course of action. In some states the legal concept of duty to rescue would exempt them from being required to intervene because it would result in “peril to yourself or to others” (http://www.thelaw.com/law/good-samaritan-laws-the-duty-to-help-or-rescue-someone.218/). I believe that the concept of ethical egoism is superior compared to other moral theories because it recognizes that people should act with regard to the consequences of their

    Read More

  • Perspective View Of The Trolley Cart Problem

    843 Words  | 2 Pages

    This was set up to decide if it the person could live with watching 5 people die, knowing that something could be done, or have the weight of having killed one person to save the five. The moral background to this problem is if someone is able to live with themselves knowing that a lever could’ve been some way that the people could have been saved, but yet if that lever was pulled, on a moral standard would be have a murder on that person's hand as there is one person on the other track. The study of morality states that: [m]orality describes the principles that govern our behavior.

    Read More

  • Understanding the Bystander Effect in Society

    843 Words  | 2 Pages

    Imagine that you were walking down a crowded hallway and you stumble upon a person passed out in the middle of the hall. You are not the only one who sees this person but you notice no one else is helping. Would you help the person or keep walking? Your answer is probably “of course I would help the person, it’s the human thing to do”. If your answer closely relates to the given one you are mostly likely incorrect. According to studies done by both amateur and professional psychologist you are more likely to keep walking than help that fallen person. This is something known as the Bystander Effect. The bystander effect is a phenomenon where no help is offered to a victim due to the presence of others and

    Read More

  • The Kitty Genovese Murder Case

    2234 Words  | 5 Pages

    The bystander effect plays a key role in society today. More and more people ignore a person in distress.

    Read More

  • The Trolley Problem, by Judith Jarvis Thomson

    756 Words  | 2 Pages

    Let’s consider the Mother-Son case. The trolley is still hurtling towards five workers. Here, the bystander is a woman who has the option of throwing a switch to divert the path of the trolley towards only one person. In this case, however, that one person happens to be her son. Is it still morally permissible for her to throw the switch? I would have to say no.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay: What´s A Bystander?

    1284 Words  | 3 Pages

    A bystander is a person who is present and overlooks an event but takes no part within it. If someone was to be lying on a sidewalk unconscious and another person walked by and ignores the fact that there is a human being lying passed out in front of them, it makes them a bystander. However, bystanders are present in many different varieties. A possible bystander could be someone who hears a conversation occurring about breaking into a house, if the person decides not to say anything and later the house gets broken into it makes them a bystander. A psychological study done by Bibb Latané and John Darley discovered that “…people are less likely to offer help when they are in a group than when they are alone” (Burkley). This discovery can be

    Read More

  • The Moral Side Of Murder Essay

    787 Words  | 2 Pages

    He presents a few hypothetical stories and one real one to get the students to think this question through. In one of the illustrations used the professor asks how many in the audience would actually push a “fat man” over a bridge onto the tracks below to stop a runaway trolley from killing five workers who were on the tracks in the way of the unstoppable trolley. I was surprised to see that a few hands actually went up. The argument of a student that had raised their hand in hypothetical agreement to pushing the man over the bridge, for the greater good, was that five other lives would be saved for the life of this one. Opposing views, of which whom I agreed with, were that by pushing the “fat man” over the bridge you were actually choosing and making a conscious decision to take a life; who are we to decide whose life is more valuable than

    Read More

  • The Trolley Problem Summary

    646 Words  | 2 Pages

    1. In The Trolley Problem by Thomson she says that she feels a bystander may intervene in a situation such as the trolley problem. She believes if they don’t intervene they aren’t causing the men any harm by not throwing the switch. However, she argues that the driver of the trolley does cause harm if he does not throw the switch. Her feelings lead her to an incorrect conclusion because there is no difference in the intentions or means of the bystander and the driver. If the bystander sees the trolley coming and chooses not to pull the switch they do no harm because they don’t intend the harm that is to come to the 5 men at the end of the track, which is their death. Contrary to what Thomson argues, the driver of the trolley also does no harm because he is not the cause or means of the harm. He did not rig the trolley to stop functioning properly so that he could have an excuse and ram into the men to kill them. Nor did he intend to kill them or be in the trolley that ran into them, it was just by chance. He

    Read More

More about Bystander's Three Options Essay

Open Document