Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Debates about censorship
Controversy in censorship in schools
Debates about censorship
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Debates about censorship
Paper, Leather, and Words
Thesis: Some schools have bought books for their library for students to read, however, there have been cases where the school has either tried to hide the book or books, or banned them. As well some schools have been sued for getting the books or taking the books away from the mind of young readers. Schools have been in these situations many times, and have either dealt with the problem or put it away and out of sight. However despite the problems it causes schools should not have the rights to take away books no matter how “inappropriate” it may seem in their eyes, as well, parents shouldn’t have power to take away the right of reading.
It is really sad when
…show more content…
It was a small town an angry parent tried suing the public liberian because she thought the book was too “inappropriate”, and tried pressing lawsuits even though she was a town fraud (Buckley Christopher 64).
Some schools don’t care about book censoring, and some of the parents are the same way or some say it’s a waste of time and a distraction of what really needs to be done in the school
(St. Petersburg FL 2). It has always been a debate in the public Florida high school, but in the eyes of the school board it isn’t necessary to have to keep checking over and over again, as well as they have more important problems to deal with (St. Petersburg FL 2). The students of their age are going into adulthood and should be open to the world of literature (St. Petersburg
Time 2). As well if the school purchases any literature it means the school has approved it and students are allowed to read the book if wanted, and that students and parents should stop trying to protest (St. Petersburg Times 2).
Parents are one of the main causes of the issue; they read the books their children get and start criticizing the books and get onto the school for it. It is tired some for the schools or any
…show more content…
The parent is a mother and says, “I do not like the censoring of books for everyone” (St. Petersburg Times 21A). She has also stated, “If the school board has approved the book then the children should have the right to read it” (St. Petersburg Times 21A).
It is also not just that parent several students have also testified for their reading right. The parent says “Wake up, people. We are talking about fantasy, not reality. Someone has finally published a book over 100 pages that is keeping kids interested in reading again - gee, what a concept - and people want to stop this? One of our great freedoms is being allowed to read what we want. Please don't step on my or my children's freedom.” (St. Petersburg Times 21A).
So far all that has been shown are students, parents or schools, but the main question is “does religion have anything to do with the censoring of books?”. Does religion have anything to do with the censoring of books? Well they do yet they don’t. Down in England a spokesman of a church said “"We love the little devil. We are not in the business of censoring books.
However, schools set their own policies and we never interfere." (Urquhart, Conal, and
Foerstel, Herbert N. Banned in the U.S.A.: a Reference Guide to Book Censorship in Schools and Public Libraries. Westport, CT: Greenwood, 1994. Print.
Trelease, Jim. "Book Banning Violates Children and Young Adult Freedoms." Book Banning. Ed. Ronnie D. Lankford. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2007. At Issue. Rpt. from "Censorship and Children's Books." Trelease-on-Reading.com. 2006.Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 31 Mar. 2014.
...etter than ignorance. Book censorship should not limit the amount of knowledge a child can receive, instead, books should be used to benefit children in their education and future career.
Book banning is a prime target for censorship. Censorship in print media, notably book banning, occurs across homes, schools, stores, and other facilities daily. Censorship in the schools is the most widespread and exposed place for book banning. Do administrators and school boards have the right to ban books? Are we taking away the rights of children to read? In case of Island Trees Schools District V. Pico in New York, the Supreme Court gave the school board broad discretion to frame curriculum and teach civic and moral values. This case resulted in the school board removing ten books from the school library for being "anti-american, anti-christian, anti-semitic, and just plain filthy." Another case involving book banning was Hazelwood School District V. Kuhlmeier. In this case the Supreme Court again gave school officials the broad discretion to control curriculum. This time the court left open the question if this affects the school libraries. In Olathe, Kansas, the district's superintendent made the decision to remove all copies of Nancy Gardner's Annie On My Mind because of it imposing views for gay actions. This standpoint resulted in a public book burning by a homophobic community group. At Hempfield High School in Western Penn...
“If a teacher is using a text or piece of literature, there has to be value to it and it is important to be exposed to as much as possible” (Feldpausch). These wise words sum up what most teachers respond to when asked the question “Should parents censor text/literature in schools?” Highly educated, teachers know their own idea on this and can back it up with fact and personal experiences. What it comes down to is one simple phrase: Parents should not be able to decide what we can learn about in class.
The American Association of School Administrators (AASA) defines censorship as: “The removal, suppression, or restricted circulation of literary, artistic, or educational materials… of images, ideas, and information…on the grounds that these are morally or otherwise objectionable in light of standards applied by the censor” (Miner 1998). In schools there are three types of censorship, one type is a “parent who doesn’t want their child to read a particular book. Another is a parent, teacher, administrator, or school board member who argues that no one in the class, or school should read the book in dispute. Lastly, there is censorship that involves someone who is part of an organized campaign, whether of a local or national group, and who goes in ready for a fight and wants to make a broader political point” (Miner 1998). Although there are many others ways that a piece of literature could get censored, most censored works are asked to be removed from classrooms and school libraries.
Every year in the United States we have books being banned and challenged by many people who do not like the contents of books. When researching for this argument essay I found an article written by Rebecca Hagelin. Rebecca Hagelin is the author of Home Invasion: Protecting Your Family in a Culture That’s Gone Stark Raving Mad and the vice president of communications and marketing at the Heritage Foundation (Lankford).
...ain groups consider books to be immoral does not mean they need to be pulled from the shelves. Censoring is acceptable for the youth, but there is an age when we all grow up and are able to handle books with explicit content.
However, Los Osos High School and several other high schools have not banned these books because they are important pieces of literature and their offensive content originates from the time period they were writing about. However, that freedom doesn’t seem to extend to all books. On August 5, 2016, Jennifer Teresi, a Los Osos High School English teacher for freshmen and sophomores, attempted to get several books authorized in order to broaden the amount of modern literature at our school. However, the school administration quickly rejected these books without a clear explanation, leading to many questions and speculation as to the reasons why the books were rejected.
...too, have the right to freely express themselves and receive information. Therefore, minors have the right to read any materials in which they desire. By banning The Catcher In the Rye, and novels of the like, the rights of U.S. citizens are restricted.
The Houston Chronicle, pp. C14. Retrieved December 2, 2002 from Lexis-Nexis/Academic database. This article emphasizes the point that censors go too far when they attempt to not only ban a book for their own children but want to remove it altogether from a school library, so that other students cannot read it.
“Some parents oppose having their children exposed to fiction that doesn’t have a happy ending, teach a moral lesson, or provide noble role models. If these and other individual preferences were legitimate criteria for censoring materials, school curricula would narrow to only the least controversial—and probably least relevant—material. It would hardly address students' real concerns, satisfy their curiosity or prepare them for life.” (Censorship in Schools). Banning books or censoring material eliminates the true components that create each literary work. Not all books have happy endings or provide godly figures, but that is the beauty of storytelling. Without the vast set of elements that make up a novel, it would be harder to address real situations or help prepare individuals for life ahead. When society bans books it denies the appreciation of great literary works that hold powerful meaning which helps shape the lives of
The most debatable and controversial form of censorship today is the banning of books in school libraries. Banning books that educate students is wrong and selfish. Censorship of books in school libraries is neither uncommon nor an issue of the past. Books with artistic and cultural worth are still challenged constantly by those who want to control what others read. The roots of bigotry and illiteracy that fuel efforts to censor books and free expression are unacceptable and unconditional. Censoring school books in libraries can often lead to censorship of our basic freedoms guaranteed in the First Amendment. In some cases, a minority ends up dictating the majority in censorship cases. To be told what is permissible reading material and what is not is a direct violation of the First Amendment of the Constitution.
Many parents believe that some books are “pure rot” because of the family-value damaging content that lies within the covers (Lankford). Children are often naively drove to the library, parents unknowing of the content easily found within the shelves. Books like these goes against family preferences, religions, limits, and traditions which is why many are challenged of their
Censoring of Books Books are extremely important in school. The banning of some books from schools and libraries would take away an ability to learn. Many people believe that some books are inappropriate for schools because of sexual content, drug use, or the demonstration of homosexuality. It is common now for kids to read books with this kind of content and taking them away would be taking away freedom of expression, there are also ways around it if the books are too inappropriate for small children. Many parents have taken on a new form of parenting and do not hide what happens in the world from their children.