Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Analyzing romantic poetry essay
The essay romantic poetry
The essay romantic poetry
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Analyzing romantic poetry essay
Gerard Manley Hopkins was a meticulous man who became a Jesuit priest and worked hard at spreading his faith in Roman Catholicism. Hopkins was acknowledged for his religious themes as well as his unique poetic techniques. Hopkins's poems consisted of what he called `sprung rhythm' as well as assonance, alliteration, and internal rhyme. Hopkins often resembled Romantic poets with his affection for nature and aim for individuality. With his strongly distinct language and eccentric forms, Hopkins's work was often regarded as a twentieth-century poet's writing rather than a Victorian poet's. In his other works such as "Hurrahing in Harvest" or "The Wreck of the Deutschland", Hopkins's emphasis on idiosyncratic literature was illustrated in his depictions of nature in which wild images replaced regular patterns of beauty. In "Pied Beauty", Hopkins's "medievalism influenced his typological as well as his typical mode of artistic representation..." (Bump 83). In this poem, Hopkins describes nature's details with strange correlations and glorifies God for these creations. With the inspiring age of 19th century Impressionist imagination in art, Hopkins had painted his own work of art in a fresh and unpopular manner in "Pied Beauty" (Lowenstein 158). His new presentation of beauty and atypical descriptions of objects in this poem demonstrates his ability to create hypothetical prose. Hopkins's usage of bizarre analogies between objects and abstruse images of nature's concurring differences accentuates the worship of God's existence and makings (Hartman 103). His unusual representation of nature astonishes the audience of the 19th century as well as the normal structure of literature. The 19th century poem, "Pied Beauty" by Gerard Manley Hop...
... middle of paper ...
...nd diction reveals that anything in nature is beautiful since it came from the hands of God. The creations of imperfections and other things are the great works of God and should be praised. If all deficiencies are detested, there would be no fairness and unification of goodness and positive motives. To acquire complete peace within, one must have leniency and justice towards everything that exists. Gerard Manley Hopkins lays emphasis on the fact that there is no such thing as a perfect life, and imperfections will live continually through nature. With that, all of nature's aspects should be granted respect considering it was made from God. All the imperfections in life ought to be viewed as beautiful and praise be given to God for that. There are many blemishes and errors in the world today that should be disregarded and be recognized for its beauty in existence.
In the article “God’s Heart for the Poor,” Dr. Jay W. Richards, a famous author, claims that Christians should have both heart and mind in order to help the poor and become a true, good neighbor. He uses some Bible verses to teach the readers about the importance of being a good neighbor and uses The Piety Myth to explain how Christians should “exercise prudence” and connects this concept to the economics.
Euthyphro initially defines piety as a simple matter of being what the gods like or what is dear to them, however Socrates points out that “different gods consider different things to be just, beautiful, ugly, good, and bad” (Grube & Cooper, 2002, pg. 9, P7, e). Some things that might be agreeable to one god may be disagreeable to another such as Euthyphro punishing his father “may be pleasing to Zeus but displeasing to Cronus and Uranus, pleasing to Hephaestus but displeasing to Hera,” (Grube & Cooper, 2002, pg. 9, P7, b). This leads to Euthyphro changing his definition of piety to be what is aggregable to all the gods rather than the gods. Euthyphro shifts from the former to the latter because Socrates calls attention to the fact that the gods fight among themselves and that those arguments don't emerge over issues and inquiries of fact and certainty, since those sorts of understandings can be reached through evaluation or examination.
It is hard to say that one is human and perfect at the same time. Human beings are not capable of achieving perfection; if that would be so, humans would stop being humans. By nature the human race is full of flaws, some appearing as early as in the womb. From defects in the body, to defects in the mind, to the mistakes that one makes in quotidian life, it is impossible to deny that human imperfection exists. To try to manipulate humans into perfection is not only impossible, but it takes away the very essence of being a human being. The short story “The Birthmark” by Nathaniel Hawthorn, illustrates this teaching through the character of Aylmer, an ambitious and devoted scientist who is appalled by his wife Georgiana’s birthmark, believing it to be a perceivable sign of her human flaws and eagerly waits to remove it from her cheek. This story raises riveting questions such as, what is humanity all about, can human beings ever achieve perfection through science, is Hawthorn attacking science or a wider issue, and more significantly, should science take the place of God. Through the use of symbolism in “The Birthmark”, Hawthorn indirectly implies that imperfection is an essential part of being human and that science should not interfere; thus he is hinting his personal views toward science and its limitations over nature.
Religion in the Middle Ages takes on a character all of its own as it is lived out differently in the lives of medieval men and women spanning from ordinary laity to vehement devotees. Though it is difficult to identify what the average faith consists of in the Middle Ages, the life told of a radical devotee in The Book of Margery Kempe provides insight to the highly intense version of medieval paths of approaching Christ. Another medieval religious text, The Cloud of Unknowing, provides a record of approaching the same Christ. I will explore the consistencies and inconsistencies of both ways to approach Christ and religious fulfillment during the Middle Ages combined with the motivations to do so on the basis of both texts.
The poem "Pied Beauty" begins by praising God for all the colorful and diverse things in nature. The speaker is thankful for everything with dots, circles, different colors, etc. He seems to be fond of nature and "the great outdoors." Many of the images in the poem made me think of camping out, or a picnic. For example, fresh fire-coal, chestnut falls, finches, skies of two colors, cows, etc. But the poem does not only speak of natures’ diversity. It also makes reference to manmade things. For example, man’s trades, tackle, and trim are also varied. The landscape plotted and pieced. The poem goes on to thank God for more things. Everything that is different, everything that is changing, everything that has dots, etc. At the end of the poem, the speaker says, "He fathers-forth whose beauty is past change." I had trouble with this line, because I did not know what the speaker meant by this. But after researching, and asking around, I came to the conclusion that it means that God, who creates change, is unchanging himself. While the beauty of the earth lies in its change, and it’s diversity… the beauty of God is unchanging and timeless. So there is a bit of irony at the end.
... all equal forms, and from equal forms to equal practices, from equal practices to equal notions, until from equal notions he realizes the notion of absolute beauty, and finally knows what the essence of beauty is. Diotima explains that this is the life for which a man should live in the view of absolute beauty; a beauty that if you once touched you would not care of gold, clothing, and attractive boys, who’s presence entrances you; and you many a one would be satisfied to live seeing them and talking about them with out food or water, if that were possible, you only want to look to be closer to them and to stare at them. But what if man had eyes to see the true divine beauty, pure and undisrupted, not clogged with the pollutions of human life. To that place looking, and having ability to communicate with true beauty divine and simple? Remember how in that communion only, beholding beauty with the eye of the mind, he will be able to bring forward, not images of beauty, but realities for he has hold not of an image but of a reality, and bringing forth and nourishing true virtue to become the friend of God and be immortal, if mortal man may. Would that be a non-honorable life?"
Have you ever wondered why religion and piety was the utmost important during the Middle Ages? The day Charlemagne rule at the height of the kingdom he along with medieval people from monks to common believers showed piety or had sought to live a more godly and religious life.
The moral code of a society is established by many different factors. A large amount of different social guidelines are derived from religious doctrines. Due to the evolution of religion, social guidelines lack an absolute. The absolute of piety is what Socrates seemed to be searching for. His questioning of Euthyphro may have been due to his innocent curiosity. It is also probable to assume that Socrates knew that there was no true definition of Piety, and that his overall quest to find the universal of piety was used more as an example. He may have been expressing critical thought and encouraging society to understand the variation of individual perception, and the distinction of human existence. In my opinion, piety cannot have a universal meaning, due to the variation of the human race. The understanding of human fallibility and differentiation of human existence, in my opinion is what Plato meant to express with his construction of the theory of forms. I also believe that representing the lack of human similarity in terms of a pious action, was the reason for Socrates’ severe questioning of Euthyphro.
“The integrity of impression made by manifold natural objects… in the tranquil landscape, and especially in the distant line of the horizon, man beholds somewhat as beautiful as his own nature” (Emerson). Rather than providing a technical, concrete definition of nature, Ralph Waldo Emerson brings a fresh take to how nature is defined. In fact, other authors and individuals have shaped their own definition of nature: what they believe it possesses in addition to what it encompasses. This theme has been widely discussed, with a peak in the nineteenth century. Ralph Waldo Emerson and Henry David Thoreau are responsible for the fixation of nature in literature, and Christopher McCandless plus Cheryl Strayed are answerable for bringing that fixation into a more recent time period. Nature was and is a prevalent theme in literature and society; however, every individual views it differently. While Emerson, Thoreau, McCandless, and Strayed all took similar approaches in interacting with nature, they differ in their belief of what nature offers individuals.
...This is probably my favorite poem that I’ve ever read. It has such influence on so many popular ideas today. It talks about loving and respecting nature, which I agree with completely. When I hear of people killing animals just for fun, it makes me mad. It’s hard to make me mad, but one thing that never fails is total lack of respect for nature, or anything, for that matter. I think we should all take a good hard look at a certain stanza of this poem again. “He prayeth best, who loveth best All things both great and small; For the dear God who loveth us, He made and loveth all.” If everyone understood these lines, and took them to heart, Coleridge would be very pleased, and the mariner’s penance would have not been served in vain. The world would be a better place. Man and nature would no longer be “out of tune.” This is the romantic poem of romantic poems.
qualities on the forces of nature, because we are afraid and powerless against the superior forces of nature. "If men are thought that there is no almighty and all just God, no divine world order and no future life, they will feel exempt from all obligation to obey the precepts of civilization"(pg.44). He is trying to say that because we are so weak and powerless we cannot control the superior forces of nature. There will be chaos without it.
Euthyphro first defines piety as to what he is doing now which is prosecuting his own father. This definition did not satisfy well with Socrates. Socrates explain that the definition is more like a pious action. He wants to know the form itself that makes pious actions pious.
Have you ever had to choose between living a life of luxury and plenty or choose one that contained hardship and want, but you were able to help the poor? Mother Teresa, in the book Something Beautiful for God, written by Malcum Muggeridge, had to face this same issue. Everyone believes that Mother Teresa helped the poor, but some believe that Mother Teresa should have helped them and some believe they should have not.
Flourishing nature is most beauteous in areas which have not been maimed by the human race. The idea that spiritual and philosophical wellness can be found in nature is supported world-wide. Many different cultures use their eco-rich surroundings to become more spiritually/philosophically endowed. In the short story “A White Heron” by Sarah Orne Jewett there are two fundamental relationships with society and nature that reflect the author’s point of view in support of this idea. The first is a good example of how nature can positively affect the spiritual/philosophical wellness of a person through an appreciative, loving, and tolerant relationship (Sylvia). The second is a destructive, parasitic relationship that is only beneficial to one party (the hunter). Sylvia struggles with her loyalty to her own innocence and respect of nature because of the exciting new possibilities the hunter promises to her. I will elaborate on topics such as the nature of Sylvia’s relationships, the narrator’s point of view, and the writing style in the text to demonstrate an understanding of how the author saw the relationship of society and nature in “A White Heron”.
The world around us has different views of what humans must look like or be. All of us have different sized feet, hairstyles, and clothes. Truly this idea of perfection can lead to terrible choices and horrible outcomes. Nathaniel Hawthorne two short stories “The Birthmark” and “Rappaccini 's Daughter” Hawthorne gives us a better understanding of perfection as two men try to make their life perfect and everything around them perfect. As we read “The Birthmark”, Aylmer tries during the whole story to perfect his wife who is already a beautiful creation and cannot recognize what he has. In the story “Rappaccini’s Daughter” Rappaccini developed a poison that gives his daughter powers in order to protect the beauty that she has in the story and