Bear Came Over The Mountain Comparison

1232 Words3 Pages

Memories, with or without context, play a key role as plot devices in both Away from Her and “Bear Came Over the Mountain.” Used to provide context for their only semi-chronological story lines, memories in the story and movie alike give solid glimpses of the past that allow the plot to move forward. One of the most prominent memories, in both the story and the movie, and certainly the clearest of the latter, is the section in which Grant and Fiona go on a walk/ski in a park. The differences between the scene and the passage are substantial, ranging from difference in message to difference in visuals. This section is an excellent example of the drastic differences sometimes found in adaptations, and allows for the presentation of a case for …show more content…

The visuals of the film scene are filled to the brim with green and brown, setting a scene befitting of the first big thaw of Spring, rather than the “depths of winter,” described in the story. It is far from a simple difference in pallette and time of day however. Where the passage gives off the impression of solitude and barren terrain, referring to Grant and Fiona as being “under the full moon and over the black striped snow,” painting the image of two lone wanderers, isolated between two forces of nature, the movie scene is bright and alive. Grant and Fiona are walking under tree cover, but an abundance of light filters through the foliage. Even the camera shots are warm and inviting, with close views of the actor’s faces, and with great emphasis on every word spoken. The soundscape is rich with the sound of crunching leaves and chirping birds, drawing a sharp contrast with what would likely be the snow crunch punctuated heavy silence of the story passage. The reason for this difference likely has a great deal to do with how this scene needed to be perceived by the movie audiences. Grant stores his hope in the likelihood that Fiona remembering this outing is a sign of her not actually being cursed with her disease, so it makes sense that the filmmaker would want to present it in a positive, warm light, literally and symbolically. Whereas in the story, it is immediately made clear in the text that Grant thinks this is a significant sign, …show more content…

In both, Grant’s reaction to, and later thoughts on Fiona’s sudden remembrance serves to highlight his ready willingness to doubt Fiona, leading to Grant projecting his own past mistakes onto Fiona, suspecting her of faking it all to punish him. In the film, Fiona’s recognition is much more surprising. The drastic difference between the snowy forest and it’s much more verdant counterpart would make for a challenging memory to call upon for someone losing their mental faculties at such a drastic rate. In the story, both scenes are in winter, so her remembering is much less extreme. Becuase of its chronological limitation, it makes sense that the film would opt for the more visually striking difference, to apparently validate Grant’s doubts without all the extra context required to do so in the story. In the story, all Fiona technically remembers is that the same area was in the moonlight last time they were there. This smaller realization is balanced by a much more in depth fleshing out of Grant’s misdeeds. While only a few bubbles of memory are used to hint at Grant’s affairs with students in the film, an entire section of the story is dedicated to it. It stands to reason that the film would want a sharper contrast to compare to the diminished context of Grant’s affairs, and in this way, when adding up the contributions of Fiona’s remembering at the park, and Grant’s

Open Document