Audio Recording Observation

811 Words2 Pages

As I performed participant observation this weekend, continuously walking and circling the 9/11 memorial pools in an almost figure eight fashion, I performed two different types of note taking: audio recording and hand-written. Of course, both methods had their advantages and disadvantages. First, the audio recording was great for picking up details. As I type my observations, the audio recording paints a fuller picture of the field and help me recollect events much better. However, one disadvantage is that the notes are a bit long. I recorded everything I saw or mentioned what I thought was significant, which was too tedious or later turned out to be insignificant. Second, hand written notes were often brief, which is nice. I quickly …show more content…

First, the majority of people take photos. This accounts for all racial and age groups that I encountered. Second a significant amount of people actually do not touch the memorial. They take photos or stare at the pool or memorial, interacting with their eyes, but, however, at most given times, there are very few people making hand contact. Or if they do touch it, the moment is very brief. Touching the memorial is a fleeting experience which is at times difficult to record. For those who did touch the memorial, the most popular way of touching it is with only the fingertips. People are either pointing at specific names or just make contact to the panel. Of course, there are other hand gestures people use to touch the memorial. However, the most consistent touching I noticed was with the fingertips. Similarly, younger children touch the memorial, but it is usually at a quicker pace, not as drawn out as adults. This can be seen with the Asian and white girls poking the name panels with different fingers, or the white boys climbing on it. I am not sure what the cause of this is. Quite simply, they could be children just playing around like normal, or quite possibly, it could show their lack of connection to the memorial since most of them were definitely born after 2001. This inquiry would require further research. In addition to the children, I …show more content…

I did not anticipate such a consistent practice among various guests. This leads me to ask new questions to those at the memorial. Why does one touch the name panel? What type of feelings does it give the individual? Is there a specific reason one touches it a certain way? In addition, does touching the memorial act as a conduit for their experience? Are they connected to those who died when they make contact? These questions, hopefully, will further help me figure out just what people are experiencing on this ground. One difficulty I had today was what I would call, I guess, the separation between field and home. The moment I saw the Firefighter bronze mural that was when I myself felt the emotional pull of the research. At this spot, I interpreted this as the real beginning of the memorial, where I see those who sacrificed their lives that day. In addition, after noticing so many people touching the name panels with their fingertips, I myself swelled up with emotions. Thinking about it too much definitely causes a personal reaction, one that probably an outside researcher would not experience. In addition, because of these feelings, I hope my research is not tainted based on my own experiences with the memorial. Is there an actual significance with certain types of touching or am I the one interpreting significance through my own sensations and

Open Document