Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Aristotle's view on friendship
Aristotle's view on friendship
Characteristics of a special friendship
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Aristotle's view on friendship
Friendships is a distinctively personal relationship that is grounded in a concern on the role of each individual for the benefit of the other, for other’s sake, which involves some degree of intimacy. Aristotle evaluates the question of whether friendships should or should not be broken off when the other individual changes a sense of personality. Friendship is impossible when there is too great a gap between people and often two friends will grow apart if one becomes more virtuous than the other. However, Aristotle describes in the Nicomachean Ethics three ideas to maintain a friendship. Aristotle says friendships should be useful, receive goodness, and make of itself pleasant for a virtuous life. One of the three types of friendship …show more content…
One person spends time with another. They get along after discovering their similar wits and characteristics they may share. If ten years pass by, dependent upon these two people will decide if they should remain in each other’s lives. Once again, one individual may become more virtuous than the other. After both individual stumble upon an argument that they feel will jeopardize their friendship, most people think it is part of the friendship, which still is for some people. It has to be one person who is willing to keep this pleasant relationship. If one individual becomes that successful businessperson, while his friend becomes some drug dealer and throws away his life through his/her choices, it is impossible for the successful businessperson to love his friend, while the other friend is dealing drugs and continuing his/her lack of free will. A man cannot love someone who engages wrongdoing. Many human beings need a positive impact upon another person. Nancy Sherman also says that “friends may be instruments and tools in the sense in which money and political connection are. They provide us with the means for the promotion of particular ends. Thus, we depend upon the aid and support of friends for accomplishing ends we cannot realize on our own.” If one simply does not find pleasure in friendship any longer, this person should remember the intimacy he/she had with their former comrade, never persecuting against another former comrade and seeing them as enemies. Thus, cherishing a friendship becomes virtuous, for the sake of goodness, pleasure, and becoming
Friendship is a necessity throughout life whether it is during elementary school or during adulthood. Some friendships may last a while and some may last for a year; it depends on the strength of the bond and trust between the two people. In the novel A Separate Peace by John Knowles, the main characters, Gene and Finny, did not have a pure friendship because it was driven by envy and jealousy, they did not feel the same way towards each other and they did not accurately understand each other.
Friendship can be debated as both a blessing and a curse; as a necessary part of life to be happy or an unnecessary use of time. Friends can be a source of joy and support, they can be a constant stress and something that brings us down, or anywhere in between. In Book 9 of Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle discusses to great lengths what friendship is and how we should go about these relationships. In the short story “Melvin in the Sixth Grade” by Dana Johnson, we see the main character Avery’s struggle to find herself and also find friendship, as well as Melvin’s rejection of the notion that one must have friends.
Late one evening, curled up in her nest, Harriet lay thoughtfully reading the last of Aristotle’s model of friendships: the perfect friendship. Though no secret to Harriet, Aristotle presents the idea that it is the most desirable and genuine of the three forms. The foundation of this friendship is not trivial, but instead the relationship is built on a common good and virtuous nature. As Aristotle explains, “those who love for the sake of utility love for the sake of what is good for themselves, and those who love for the sake of pleasure do so for the sake of what is pleasant to themselves.” Aristotle continues, “Perfect friendship is the friendship of men who are good, and alike in virtue; for those wish well alike to each other qua good, and they are good in themselves.” (concluding sentence or two...)
friendship that it is so valuable? And, more specifically, how does this truth fit with
I chose to write about Aristotle and his beliefs about how the virtuous human being needs friends from Book VIII from Nicomachean Ethics. In this essay I will talk about the three different kinds of friendship that (Utility, Pleasure, and Goodness) that Aristotle claims exist. I will also discuss later in my paper why Aristotle believes that Goodness is the best type of friendship over Utility or Pleasure. In addition to that I will also talk about the similarities and differences that these three friendships share between one another. And lastly I will argue why I personally agree with Aristotle and his feelings on how friendship and virtue go hand in hand and depend on each other.
Friendship is a bond that brings society together as a whole. The article, “Friendship in an Age of Economics” by Todd May describes six friendships that pertain to life. In the Of Mice and Men excerpt, the reader meets two characters, George and Lennie, and their friendship is shown. Of the six friendships, in “Friendship in an Age of Economics,” the true friendship, developed by Aristotle, is used in Of Mice and Men through George and Lennie’s relationship because of how they act towards each other, and how they take care of one another in many different ways. First, the article introduces the audience to friendships described by Aristotle, and Todd May.
Friendship expectations play a huge role in “establishing, maintaining, and terminating friendships” thus playing a factor of ones’ interpretations and through their affiliations (West & Turner, 2016). A companionship is dependent on
If a good and self sufficient man were to develop a friendship, they may see the flaws that they themselves may not see. But not only will a good man see any flaws or things to work on in his friend, but the excellent person also who has friends can embrace the qualities that make him virtuous through his friends. This is because it is easier to view someone’s best or worst qualities through someone else’s eyes than for them to view their own. Being able to be around another person who is doing virtuous acts rather than doing virtuous acts by one’s self, gives the good man more realization that he is in fact an excellent
Aristotle argues that friendship is a vital part of life. It serves not only as a means to bond individuals together, but also a necessity in achieving overall happiness. Aristotle comments on the various types of friendships that exist, and the role they each play in society. He explains three overarching types; utility, pleasure, and complete friendship. Yet, with family, friendship is different than it is with companionship. As Aristotle states in his piece, Nicomachean Ethics on friendship in families, “they all seem to depend on paternal friendship” (Aristotle, 1161b18). In The Aeneid, Aeneas and Anchises’ relationship, perfectly embodies this. The father son bond does not distinctly resemble one of the three types, rather it is a friendship in of itself; a paternal friendship.
Aristotle presents his view of the mutual desire for good in others, or Friendship in his work, The Nicomachean Ethics. He asserts that friendship comes in three types, Virtue Friendship, Use Friendship, and Pleasure Friendship. He distinguishes Virtue Friendship as the perfect friendship, leaving Use Friendship and Pleasure friendship as deficient friendships. C.S. Lewis presents his view of friendship, which is motivated by appreciation love, in his book The Four Loves in a manner seeming to correspond to Aristotle’s concept of Virtue Friendship. Lewis also presents his perception of Companionship, which seems to correspond to Aristotle’s notion of Use and Pleasure Friendships. Lewis presents a more modern and seemingly accurate rehabilitation
Aristotle wrote on many subjects in his lifetime but one of the virtues that he examines more extensively is friendship. Aristotle believes that there are three different kinds of friendship: utility, pleasure, and virtuous friendships. He also argues that a real friendship should be highly valued because it is a complete virtue and he believes it to be greater than honor and justice. Aristotle suggests that human’s love of utility and pleasure is the only reason why the first two types of friendships exist. Aristotle also argues that humans only set up these types of relationships for personal gain. But when he speaks of the virtuous friendships, Aristotle states that it is one of the greatest attainments one can achieve.
The proposition that there is a qualification in the virtuous friendship is that individuals of virtuous similarity are benefitting off each-other through an egoistic manner. It is evident that the virtuous friendship entails the concepts of egocentrism, because Aristotle quotes, “the friend is another himself” (142 Section 5, line 33). The ideal Aristotelian friendship is where friends resemble each other through similar modes of thinking. Significantly, the concept of egocentrism would mean it is unlikely that friends who are like one-another will disagree with each other. In effect, friendships based on similarity are enduring, because the agents whom think alike will avoid conflict. Insofar the similar individuals agree with each other
In life we come across many people. Some will hate us while others will adore us. The ones who hate us can be referred to as enemies and the ones who show us adoration are referred to as friends. There are three types of friends. They are the aquaintinces we make in school, the friends we loose as one grows, and best friends who may stray, but never too far away.
The notion that others can only gain at my cost is detrimental to the formation of true friendships. Instead what is formed are temporary bonds of utility and pleasure for the most part void of any care for the excellence of the friends. This lack of friendships, both political and personal is part of a vicious cycle of lack of caring. The isolation and competition brought about by capitalist culture makes the formation of friendships more difficult, while a lack of friendship promotes a narcissistic way of thinking that reinforces the capitalist culture. As Schall implies in his essay on Aristotle and friendship, even a virtuous life lived without sharing one’s virtues with others through friendship loses meaning. People alienated, due to their capitalist culture of narcissism despair at the meaninglessness of solitude, and turn to consumption in order to distract themselves from the
Friendship is a necessary aspect of every human’s life, as we are not self sufficient in and of ourselves (Other Selves, pg. 30). Despite its necessity, in some cases we are either forced or morally required to end relationships. When the trust between two parties has been broken, the loyalty of the friendship is soiled, and it is therefore a true and just action to end the friendship.