Argumentative Essay: Stars In The Universe

943 Words2 Pages

One of the most provocative mysteries of the Universe is whether or not we're alone. Our galaxy alone contains potentially hundreds of billions of planets. Let alone the other billions of galaxies in the observable Universe (Kerr, "Alone in the Universe"). Considering those numbers, it is very likely that we are not alone. You could even say it's arrogant to believe we are the only planet able to inhabit thriving life forms.

Despite that you may not be able to see anything in the sky at this moment, there is an endless amount of stars with the likelihood of being orbited by additional planets. As specified by NASA, there are "1000 billion billion" stars in the observable Universe (Moebius, “Stars in the Universe”). We are but a speck …show more content…

Surely, that is not a troublesome task considering how abundant stars tend to be. Lisa Kaltenegger, an Associate Professor of Technology explains how "we don't find the planets, the star gives away that the planet exists” (00:07:25-00:07:33). It's similar to an owner with an over-eager dog. If you see someone attempting to withstand the pull of a dog, you don't need to see the dog to comprehend that it is pulling a person. Thus, the further the person leans back, the larger the dog. "In a way, it's the same for stars," Kaltenegger states, "when a planet pulls, the star 'leans' back." In other words, when the planet goes one direction, the star will go the other direction, revealing the "wobble" of the star. When the star wobbles, it indicates that something is tugging on it. Moreover, as the planet arrives at the front of the sun from our point of view, the blazing stellar surface that makes the sun bright will darken. Consequently, the star will appear to be slightly duller than it used to be. This assures us something (a planet) is blocking the star. Meanwhile, NASA's Kepler telescope has discovered 95 new planets outside of our Solar System, exoplanets (Exoplanets 101). Keep in mind that that number adds on to the other thousands of planets the Kepler Telescope has discovered. Ranging from the size of "fluffy mini-Neptunes to Jupiter like …show more content…

In the hottest places, driest places, coldest places, and in the deepest places there is life so long there is liquid water in that environment. Take Water Bears for example (also known as tardigrades). These micro animals are reasonably the most tolerant organisms. Being able to withstand radiation, the bitter cold of absolute zero and the wrath of temperatures surpassing 300 degrees Fahrenheit (Parjan, "The Tardigrade"). This beast is capable of undergoing the same conditions that would utterly demolish a human. If these types of organisms can prosper on our Earth, why can't it on other planets? You can find extreme forms of life here on our planet living in the most intense types of environments. Life can adapt to harsher environments and eventually grow to become used to it. Microorganisms have the power to evolve. Although it takes a considerably long time, it does not indicate that evolution will not occur. Think of it this way. If a snail feels lonely in Central Park because he cannot come into contact with or see any snails, it does not mean it is alone. It just means there is a great deal of distance separating this snail and the other snails. In a way, it's the same for planets and stars. Just because we cannot find other life in the Universe or even in our Solar System does not mean it is not there. The only complication is that we have not sent a telescope that

More about Argumentative Essay: Stars In The Universe

Open Document