The question as to whether or not human beings are good or bad has been an ongoing theme for centuries. In my opinion I believe the outcome depends on the individual. I believe that human beings differ depending on their background and circumstances. In terms of possessing poor qualities, many of those bad qualities maybe due to lack of circumstances. One might say that those who choose a bad path may have undergone limited resources. Take for instance an individual who grew up in the judicial system may be accustomed to that lifestyle from past and previous dealings. He or she may not have had the necessary opportunities to choose a more promising life. They may have been forced to participate or go down the wrong path or felt as if there …show more content…
Free will is given to all of us however; many might argue that it may be difficult for some at times. Since free will is determined by all of us it is hard to say that all human beings do not possess this quality. However, I do believe that total free will can be limited in some cases. For instance, no one has a choice in choosing where he or she grows up or how he or she will grow up. Many individuals start off in bad circumstances, which in turn limits their total free will. Therefore I believe that free will is given to us in stages. For example, at birth no one has total free will to choose their parents and how they’ll grow up but as we grow older in life the ability to obtain total free will becomes greater. Those who’ve endured meager accommodations have the ability to change their future outcomes. Once again depending on the individual free will is a determinant for each and every one of us. He or she has the ability or opportunity to choose their future. Free will also allows us to change those circumstances that we did not necessarily have the ability to change in our …show more content…
As for what attributes to one’s motivation or what sparks an individual to succeed this would have to be determined by the individual. I believe that majority of individuals are motivated by success. Every individual possesses some motivation towards the ability to succeed are undergo gratification towards change. For example, those acquiring a weight goal may attribute their motivation towards losing or gaining weight. The motivation for results is fueled by the gratification for change. I believe the need towards being successful motivates individuals every day, whether they’re meeting their goal or not. It still motivates a person to try. This concept applies to my life as well. Much of my motivation is attributed to goals. I think many individuals seek out goals to accomplish and challenge their knowledge, body and life. In many ways motivation helps us to amend, challenge and change our lifestyles in hopes of a more promising future. Without motivation many individuals would be stuck. Stuck in careers, relationships, and circumstances we feel would be without our control. In all, motivation establishes change and helps us to obtain and ascertain goals in hopes of being a better
A perfect example is how I am unfree to do this final assignment. There are many forces that have me chained to to doing this like financial and social factors, despite the fact that I 'd much rather be doing other things. I am free though on how I choose to go about it. I could work on it a week ahead of time and work on it slowly, or I could choose to work on it in one single night. Thousands of other possibilities are also open. So to some degree, we are free, but yet also unfree. An opposition to this is the one that all the factors in our lives from the moment we are born have shaped all the moments we 've had henceforth. “what we believe and desire depends on factors completely beyond our control. Speaking generally, it depends on the way the world is; more specifically, it depends on our biological and psychological natures, the society in which we live, and our particular portion of it...”10 Everything happens in a causal chain down to the tiny chemical reactions in our brain, and all the feelings, our social place, the temperature in the room, to what we ate for breakfast. All these various variables pull and tug on our path and the choice we make is already determined. I think though that this is true to some degree, but the ultimate choice comes down to the rational thought and its decision. The weighing of all these factors is done
Choices that people make have a giant place in their lives. Most of us consider that we do these choices freely, that we have free will to make these choices. The point that most of us miss is free will is not simple as is it looks like. When one makes choices doesn’t he consider that what would that choices lead him to? Therefore does he make those choices for his benefits or his desires to make those choices? Does the environment push him to make those choices or does he have the free will to ignore his own environment? Philosopher and writes splits around those questions. There is different thesis, beliefs about free will. Some say that we are conditioned from birth with qualities of our personality, social standing and attitudes. That we do not have free will, our choices shapes up by the world we born in to. Some others believe that we born as a blank paper we could shape by the occasions or choices that we make freely. Marry Midgley on her article “Freedom and Heredity” defends that without certain limitations for instance our talents, capacities, natural feelings we would not need to use free will. Those limitations lead us to use free will and make choices freely. She continues without our limitations we do not need to use free will. Free will needs to be used according to our needs but when mentioning need not as our moral need as our needs to what could we bring up with our capacities. We need to use our free will without stereotypes. Furthermore free will should be shaped by the choice that would lead us good consequences.
It has been sincerely obvious that our own experience of some source that we do leads in result of our own free choices. For example, we probably believe that we freely chose to do the tasks and thoughts that come to us making us doing the task. However, we may start to wonder if our choices that we chose are actually free. As we read further into the Fifty Readings in Philosophy by Donald C. Abel, all the readers would argue about the thought of free will. The first reading “The System of Human Freedom” by Baron D’Holbach, Holbach argues that “human being are wholly physical entities and therefore wholly subject to the law of nature. We have a will, but our will is not free because it necessarily seeks our well-being and self-preservation.” For example, if was extremely thirsty and came upon a fountain of water but you knew that the water was poisonous. If I refrain from drinking the water, that is because of the strength of my desire to avoid drinking the poisonous water. If I was too drink the water, it was because I presented my desire of the water by having the water overpowering me for overseeing the poison within the water. Whether I drink or refrain from the water, my action are the reason of the out coming and effect of the motion I take next. Holbach concludes that every human action that is take like everything occurring in nature, “is necessary consequences of cause, visible or concealed, that are forced to act according to their proper nature.” (pg. 269)
Motivation comes in all different forms, and it depends on how a person perceives it. Motivation can be anything, and affects each person differently. A person can have multiple ways of inspiration that encourage them to succeed. A person has to be at the right place in the right time, and it’s just a matter of finding it.
The simplest description of free will, as conceived by such philosophers as David Hume, is simply that free will is, “the ability to choose an action to satisfy a desire” (Hoefer). However, modern philosophers have mostly rejected this definition because it is known that nonhuman animals also act on their wants and needs but lack the intelligence to consider their actions as free choices. A more complex assessment of free will, better differentiating between humans and animals, is that the ability of humans to choose actions flows from the relationship between their animal desires and intellects. This means that people's actions are free when they have intelligently determined the best decision to make in any situation, even if their choices conflict with what they truly want, or their base animal desires. By conquering their basic instincts to make rational, informed decisions, humans have exercised free will, which animals cannot do
Human beings always believe that what they want to do is ‘up to them,' and on this account, they take the assumption that they have free will. Perhaps that is the case, but people should investigate the situation and find a real case. Most of the intuitions may be correct, but still many of them can be incorrect. There are those who are sceptical and believe that free will is a false illusion and that it only exists in the back of people’s minds, but society should be able to distinguish feelings from beliefs in order to arrive at reality and truth.
About 2 weeks ago my thoughts towards the reality of free will ceased to exist. Everything that I had previously thought did not mean a thing; I was given a new perspective that grasped me almost instantaneously. Robert Blatchford, author of "The delusion of Free Will" provided me with a new perspective that has taken over my thinking on free will. Blatchford states, "the will is not free, and that it is ruled by heredity and environment." All it took, were those words, ...
Motivation is the main element towards success. Students, scientist, teachers and/ or any individual who wants to reach a goal needs to be motivated/ambitious. This motivation/ambition is what guides and keep people going. This ambition may be geared towards inventing/creating something, obtaining more money, and/or succeeding. The ambition people have are good, but sometimes lead to bad consequences. These consequences set the relationship between action and ambition. But, no matter what the goal is people with ambitions will not stop until their goal is met. Ambition towards obtaining something is what motivates people. For example Victor Frankenstein wanted to create a human being. As Mary Shelley writes in "Frankenstein", Victor Frankenstein wanted to be "the first to break through life and death ideal bonds"(231). His ambition was to create a human and to break these boundaries. But most importantly, he wanted to be recognized as the first individual to do this. This recognition would make him famous forever. The only thing he thought of was to break the boundaries of life and create a human creature.
“In the long run, we shape our lives, and we shape ourselves. The process never ends until we die. And the choices we make are ultimately our own responsibility.” (Eleanor Roosevelt). This is just one of the infinite examples of how human nature has been explored by so many different people. Each and every human is born with the capability of making their own choices. The decisions that they will make in the future will determine how evil they are viewed by others. Although one’s nature and nurture do affect their life, it is their own free will that determines whether or not they are evil.
Do we have free will? Why? What are the implications of your conclusion? The question is whether one really has the power to decide on his life as well as the future or if everything is predestined by nature or someone (God)?
Freedom, or the concept of free will seems to be an elusive theory, yet many of us believe in it implicitly. On the opposite end of the spectrum of philosophical theories regarding freedom is determinism, which poses a direct threat to human free will. If outside forces of which I have no control over influence everything I do throughout my life, I cannot say I am a free agent and the author of my own actions. Since I have neither the power to change the laws of nature, nor to change the past, I am unable to attribute freedom of choice to myself. However, understanding the meaning of free will is necessary in order to decide whether or not it exists (Orloff, 2002).
Nature is complicated. It includes many different sorts of things and one of these is human beings. Such beings exhibit one unique yet natural attribute that others things apparently do not—that is free will.
Is how we act is predetermined by a number of factors beyond our control or are we simply able to make choices that are not determined by our dispositions or desirers. This notion of freewill has been debated by theorists for centuries. Hard Determinists say that how we act is due to a combination of genetic factors and the environment around us. A similar notion is Fatalism where how is act is predetermined by a higher power. However Compatabalists think that how we act is a combination of freewill and what environmental and genetic endowments have been bestowed to us. This paper will critically discuss these theories and how human beings are capable of freewill.
As Peter van Inwagen said in his 1974 paper “The Incompatibility of Free Will and Determinism”, “To deny that men have free will is to assert that what a man does do and what he can do coincide”. I believe that we have free will do long as we are given the choice to go against fate. As time goes on, modem advances continue to give use more and more opportunities to change our fate. As humans grow as a species, we see our ability to change our path more and more. We also need the belief in free will to keep us sane and keep the human species prosperous, as Edward Wilson theorized.
Free will means; The theory that human beings have freedom of choice or self-determination; that is, given a ...