Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The meaning of apathy in society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Author, J.K. Rowling once stated, “Indifference and neglect often do much more damage than outright dislike.” Imagine you are waiting to cross a street, a blind man is standing in front of you.The begins to cross the street even though the light has not changed in his favor, he seems to be in no danger until you see a car about a half mile away speeding towards him. Totally unaware of the situation, the man continues walking across the street. As you and many others watch he is hit by the car. Although every single one of you had plenty of time to rescue him, you just watched, hoping that someone else would do it. After all, you don 't know him so it 's really none of your business. This is what is referred to as apathy. People close enough to see, hear, and possibly touch one another are socially distant and totally indifferent to …show more content…
Social media is prime place that produces apathy and the bystander effect. For example many of us have witnesed some sort of bullying online and do not intervene. Why is it that we do not include ourseleves? Personally I do not like to involve myself in something online in front of pretty much the world that has nothing to do with me, this is a key example of the bystander effect. The bystander effect occurs when the presence of others discourages an individual from intervening in a situation. Social psychologists Bibb Latané and John Darley popularized the concept following the infamous 1964 Kitty Genovese murder. (psychology today 1) Latané and Darley attributed the bystander effect to the perceived diffusion of responsibility onlookers are more likely to intervene if there are few or no other witnesses and social influence individuals in a group monitor the behavior of those around them to determine how to act. (psychology today 2) In Genovese 's case, each onlooker concluded from their neighbors ' inaction that their own personal help was not needed. (psychology today
The reduced empathy can be linked to a “rewiring” in the brain. Most people active on social media have an urge to rather post updates or videos of events unfolding in front of them. The urge comes from the competition to be the most popular online. The previous examples of Bill Nye and the boy in surgery shows peoples urge to post online.
The bystander effect is a the phenomenon in which the more people are are around the less likely someone will step-in or help in a given situation. THe most prominent example of this is the tragic death of Kitty Genovese. In march of 1964 Kitty genovese was murdered in the alley outside of her apartment. That night numerous people reported hearing the desperate cries for help made by Kitty Genovese who was stabbed to death. Her screams ripped through the night and yet people walked idly by her murder. No one intervened and not even a measly phone call to the police was made.
Indifference is seductive, inhumane, and the line between good and evil. Indifference is helping the enemy, it is death. Writer and Holocaust Survivor, Wiesel Elie in his speech, “The Perils of Indifference”, argues that being indifferent to those who are suffering assists the enemy. He supports his claim by first defining and describing indifference as “seductive”, “tempting”, and “easier.” Wiesel goes on to illustrate the dangers of indifference by using personal experience and historical events as examples. Finally, the author creates awareness of indifference from the past, present, and future. Wiesel’s purpose is to describe why indifference is inhumane in order to persuade people not to be indifferent. He establishes a serious tone, critical, and somber tone for Politicians, Ambassadors, Mr. President, and members of congress.
Martin Luther King, Jr. once said, “The ultimate tragedy is not the oppression and cruelty by the bad people but the silence over that by the good people.” We are All Bystanders by Jason Marsh and Dacher Keltner is an article that reflects on the psychological and social phenomenon that refers to cases in which people do not offer any assistance or help to a victim. Studies say that a person's personality can determine how they react to a bystander situation. In a book called, The Heart of Altruism, author Kristen Monroe writes the altruistic perspective. Altruistic people are strongly connected to other humans and have a concern for the well-being of others. Markus Zusak’s The Book Thief exemplifies the bystander theory through Liesel and
Latane and Darley (1968) investigated the phenomenon known as the bystander effect and staged an emergency situation where smoke was pumped into the room participants was in. Results showed that 75% of participants who were alone reported the smoke, whereas only 38% of participants working in groups of three reported (Latane & Darley, 1968). Their findings provide evidence for the negative consequence of the diffusion of responsibility. In line with the social influence principle, bystanders depend on reactions of others to perceive a situation as an emergency and are subsequently less likely to help. Latane and Darley’s findings were also supported in recent research: Garcia and colleagues (2002) found that even priming a social context by asking participants to imagine themselves in a group could decrease helping behaviour. It can be contended that these findings are examples of social proof where individuals believe actions of the group is correct for the situation, or examples of pluralistic ignorance where individuals outwardly conform because they incorrectly assumed that a group had accepted the norm (Baumeister & Bushman,
Indifference is evil because it can cause harm to others. For example In the speech, “The Perils of Indifference” by Elie Wiesel States, “The depressing tale of the St. Louis is a case in point. Sixty years ago, its human cargo -- maybe 1,000 Jews -- was turned back to Nazi Germany. And that happened after the Kristallnacht, after the first state sponsored pogrom, with hundreds of Jewish shops destroyed, synagogues burned, thousands of people put in concentration camps. And that ship, which was already on the shores of the United States, was
“The Perils of Indifference” is a speech that Elie Wiesel delivered in Washington D.C. on April 12, 1999, exactly 54 years after his release from the Nazi concentration camp Buchenwald by American troops. Both Congress along with President Clinton and Mrs. Clinton were present to hear the speech. Wiesel spoke briefly about what it was like in the concentration camps, but he focused mostly on the topic of Indifference. His speech was effective in its use of rhetoric to convince the audience that as individuals and as a world culture we cannot afford to become indifferent to the suffering around us.
The bystander effect plays a key role in society today. More and more people ignore a person in distress.
Social interactions are characterized by a fundamental process that allows to understand others ‘sensations by sharing emotions, feelings and beliefs. This ability is called empathy, a controversial and complex “umbrella term” that comprises several elements (Davis et al., 1996). Many researchers are investigating empathy trying to better define it and to decompose its subconstructs (that often overlap between them). A common shared definition suggest that empathy comprises cognitive components like perspective taking, mentalizing or self–other distinction and emotional components such as resonance with the emotions of others and the generation of an appropriate emotional response (Davis, 1996; Decety and Jackson, 2004). In other words, we
Since social media is ubiquitous it provides users the capability of extending their social circle beyond their neighborhood. Evidence proves that, “60% of those who use an online neighborhood discussion forum know ‘all or most’ of their neighbors” ( Pewdie 10) which correlates to local engagement. This is positive as social networking substitutes for some neighborhood involvement and helps build a strong trusting neighborhood. There are 2.03 billion active social media users globally, which depicts not only the prominence of social media worldwide but also how accessible social media is as 25% of social media users are active (We Are Social). Lacking language and distance barriers, social media has helped bring social issues to light as court rulings and government actions are debated online and brought to the attention of government officials. For example, the death of Eric Gardner back in July as the video of a cop choking him to death went viral recently due to social media, which has caused riots and lack of faith in the justice system. With users all across the globe posting their opinions, planning protests and debating on social media, politicians have been forced to discuss the equality of the American justice system as the government’s people are distraught (Salon). Although social media is utilized to connect the world on the negative side of the spectrum, individuals suffer
Bystander effect (Darley & Latane, 1970) refers to a decrease in response when there are bystanders around relative to no bystanders. Referring to a previous study stating that there are some cases in which group size may promote helping instead of hindering it (Fischer et al., 2011). Researchers then speculated on the possibility of positive influences from bystanders by taking public self-awareness into consideration. Researchers proposed that high public self-awareness would reverse the bystander effect in this study with 2 independent variables: bystander and presence on the forum. They are defined as number of bystanders (absent vs present) and salience of name (salient vs non-salient) respectively.
...he positive outcomes from the rise of social media along with numerous instances of strangers helping others in times of need. As more people utilize online communication, empathy will play an important role in deciding if it does more harm or more good for society.
... a lot about their own community by reading the statistics. Our social environment has changed drastically since social media has become the social norm. Friends are no longer people one can tell your darkest secrets to, and know everything about them. Drinking a coffee becomes a public event, and one’s relationship status is the latest news. One has to be aware that these changes are happening and try to benefit from social media instead of contributing to the problem. The author Charles Leadbeater says, “ You are what you share”. We must be conscious of what we share and what society has asked us to share with the world. Social media affects everyone in society, and it is because of the teen generation that it has become a disadvantage to society. Now, it is up to that same generation to find a resolution to the problem of the change of the social environment.
without knowing what is going on in reality? On a daily basis, there are a lot of many different social media applications that people use such as, Facebook, Twitter, Email, Skype, etc. Social media influences our lives by making them easier than ever, both pleasing and harmful. It affects us in many different ways, for instance, it is very helpful for contacting, more risks are abounded to happen, and in general, it changed our lives by getting us more and more attached to them. Still, social media is changing to improve, so it will be easier for us to use when needed. Therefore, we must not always rely on these social networks because we should only use them for internal use instead of being addicted to the social networking world.
As “The mobile bystander” by Basulto (2012) explains the “mobile bystander” effects of how we the people takes pictures of the scene instead of helping the victims when tragic happen. Even when two people are having dinner, both of them would take pictures of the meal in front of them rather than communicate with each other. But technology only intensified the bystander effects due to the fact that human have a tendency of being a bystander. There are still witness on the scene that willing to help the victim but that would up to their personality of not being a bystander. No one can deny that technology mainly social media has taken a lot of our attention, but being a mobile bystander would help the police or even the victim gather information of the suspect. The power of social media is to connect everyone together as a group to help others when they are in need of