Antigone Tragedy Analysis

1321 Words3 Pages

“Antigone” is a drama that was written by Sophocles. Sophocles was one of the great writers of tragedies during the ancient Greece era. For this reason, there is no debate as to whether this story is a tragedy or not. A tragedy is defined as a play that contains dismal events and has an unhappy ending, it typically involves the downfall of the protagonist. Focus on that last part; the downfall of the main character. If “Antigone” is definitely a tragedy, and a tragedy involves the destruction of the main character, than the drama must portray the hero being brought to ruin. Now, most readers would agree that it is obvious who the protagonist of the play is. Antigone, whom the play is named for, is brought to a tragic end. I completely agree; however, there is another character who could fit the role of the protagonist. That miserable definition could also be used to describe Creon, Antigone’s uncle. Due to the definitions of characters and the format of how the tragedy was written, I believe that Creon is the true protagonist of this play.
He believed that his law was above the gods’ and in doing so ruined himself. In the last verses of the play, Creon seeks death and states that “Fate has brought all my pride to a thought of dust.” Comparing these two characters, there are many similarities. Both characters are victims of tragic events that ultimately lead to their undoing. However, there can only be one tragic hero in this story. Another description of Aristotle’s tragic hero is one that pits a hero “between two extremes.” (Ohio) This definition allows us to more clearly determine who is the actual protagonist of this story. Although Antigone decides to bury her brother and risk death, it is never described as a choice. Antigone states in the prologue “it is something we must do.” This means that she is not pitted between two extremes. She does what must be done and then fully accepts the

More about Antigone Tragedy Analysis

Open Document