Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Should the privacy of famous people be respected
Celebrity rights to privacy
Should the privacy of famous people be respected
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Should the privacy of famous people be respected
The lives of celebrities might seem so enchanting from the outside, at some point, they are. Who would not want to have a lot of money, fabulous vacations, enormous houses, a variety of cars, it really seems like a dream, doesn’t it? But if truth be told, “all that glitters is not gold”. Yes, their lives seem to glitter, so do their dresses and suits, however they all struggle with different issues, as normal human beings, but the major one is privacy. Some might think that being open to public is part of being a celebrity and people have the right to know about their lives, while others disagree. From a personal perspective, having a private life is a crucial thing for everyone and celebrities certainly are not exception.
It would be odd
…show more content…
They become celebrities from the moment they are born and since then their safety is in danger. Unfortunately, there have been several incidents with stalkers. According to ‘The Guardian’ in 2013 “Anti-paparazzi legislation championed by Halle Berry has been signed into California law by state governor Jerry Brown.” Berry decided to pass a bill to protect privacy of the children of public figures because of a 27 year old stalker, who tried to get in her house several times. She was also joined by Jennifer Garner. Garner stated "There are violent, mentally-ill stalkers…like the very man who threatened to cut the babies out of my belly. Who was arrested waiting behind our daughter's preschool, standing among the throng of paparazzi.” Evidently, public figures need to have more privacy for their …show more content…
This point can not be argued, they should really have these expectations. “You can’t complain about the pressures, the paparazzi, the madness. Because that is the job. I’ve always understood that’s the deal”- said Avril Lavigne. Her position is true, however, as mentioned before everything needs to be done within boundaries. They do not expect that someone will break into their property, or someone will stalk their children and threaten their life. At some point, they all enjoy life of a celebrity and the money they earn, but no one would want to sacrifice their security for
When considering the issue of celebrities receiving unfair treatment by making their punishment worse than a regular persons is totally un orthodox so it is essential to know that their regular too. Also all people don’t know what rules they are violating or what rules they need to know so they won’t violate them. All people aren’t guilty neither are they all innocent but they should suffer equal consequences.
When they feel rejected they can become extremely violent towards whoever they feel rejected them. Celebrities need to be made aware of how to handle stalkers, so that when they are faced with the problem they can deal with it properly. A forensic science graduate states, "Risk management strategies for this type should emphasize the need for professional protection of the target despite the low frequency risk of violence, since the injury is likely to be more serious if violence does occur …" (Mohandie). Many celebrities won't go to the police to report stalkers because they do not believe it is a real problem. This does not help them get the stalker to go away. When celebrities learn about how to deal with stalkers they are more likely to report the problem to the
...uld be justifiable to emphasize that a good number of them find it sickening to miss the limelight. . Nonetheless, it goes without mentioning that celebrities get exploited because some gossip stories explore the things that would otherwise be considered to be private.
This is one of the main reasons why famous people like celebrities and personalities are very private when
This sort of behavior is constant over time. Celebrities today are posted and paraded all over TV and magazines, no matter what they do. Justin Beiber was caught drunk driving, stealing property, and many more crimes.... ... middle of paper ... ...
After observing and researching all the sources portraying celebrities I have came into a conclusion that todays society it seems like all we want is to be accepted and we tend to look at other people and judge. Its not right, we all are different and thats what makes the world go round. It would be a pretty boring world if we were all the same. Celebrities deal with this everyday, I think the paparazzi know more about some celebrities lives than they actually do. They judge them for who they are and what they do, it is not right nor fair.
“Wealth, as a byproduct of fame, provides immediate, tangible evidence of celebrity’s distinction and staying power. Fame’s windfall goes a long way in lifting financial burdens, opening the celebrity to experiences that are special. Money is no longer a “worry,” and provides “the glory side, the financial side of being famous.” Some celebrities go from “not being able to afford a home,” to multi-million dollar contracts. They are our royalty.”, according to Donna Rothwell’s essay “Being a Celebrity; A Phenomenology of Fame”(Rothwell page 191).Basically, wealth dissolves the concern regarding financial status that the average citizen feels 24/7.Like most people, to acquiring such assets does provide a sense of a luxurious life. It is
The public has been able to have access into celebrities’ private lives thanks to the “paparazzi”. Definitely, celebrities will always be in front of the camera. It comes with the frame. Nevertheless, it does not justify photographing the lives of people at the expense of their privacy. Society always wants to keep an eye on their favorite celebrities’ lives.
In the case of invading ones privacy it may have to be the case that some moral and ethical codes in the journalistic practice may have to be broken in order to expose a necessary truth. It is however important that if a journalist is to break any moral and ethical rules that they break them in the defence of public interest. In an ideal world a rule that needs to be regulated for the invasion of privacy lies within the press and paparazzi themselves. News gathering processes, particularly in the obtaining of images and information about celebrities needs to be regulated to a certain amount of decency and respect. It is however undeniable that without a reasonable expectation of privacy law in place it would be an unfair expectation of human rights for both citizens and celebrities to give full exposure on their lives to the press.
Photographing an individual whether famous or not in public will not violate that person’s privacy under the laws in most countries. Assuming the paparazzi isn’t assaulting someone or trespassing or otherwise doing something illegal while taking such a picture, he or she will not be violating the law. Public figures do not ask for a total invasion of their privitness .Few of us lead lives that are not classified into a newsworthy. Just because these people contribute to their profession in front of the world, it does not mean that they should be denied the right to privacy and respect. Therefore Paparazzi should be banned from exposing people’s private lives, any way they want.
We are part of a generation that is obsessed with celebrity culture. Celebrities are distinctive. Media and consumers alike invented them to be a different race of super beings: flawless, divine and above all the real moral world. In a 1995 New York Times article “In contrast, 9 out of 10 of those polled could think of something
Do we as a society have the right to punish celebrities when they misbehave? Do celebrities have the right to become livid when they are focused on their immoral behavior? Do they love the media attention only when it benefits them? Before we can answer the above questions, would we, furthermore, can we live our life as a celebrity if given the opportunity? The perks of illimitable wealth, vacationing all over the world, housekeepers, chefs, being in receipt of freebies from designers, multiple homes in diverse parts of the world, chauffeurs, the finest foods, and all the other perks that come with being a celebrity?
...ildren, and most of their time must be enjoyed in creating their own private space. During our childhood, we build the seeds of creativity that will eventually determine our personality. And during adulthood, we always look back to the wonders of our youth. Show business is very hard for anyone, particularly for kids. Children do not belong in the entertainment industry. Young stars often complain about a stolen childhood, the pressure they have to face at a young age forcing them to mature fast, and the risks of exposure to dirty show business while still an innocent playful child. Celebrities who were exposed to the limelight at a tender age become scarred for life by early success and tend to compensate for the childhood they were deprived of during their later years in life.
In previous years, the issue with the paparazzi and media has grown. With the advances in technology, it makes taking and posting photos of celebrities or public figures much easier. The public appears greedy and feels privy to their private lives. Celebrities, or any public figure, have very limited privacy due to the paparazzi and media. The paparazzi and media are also affecting celebrities’ children. Currently, laws are being put in effect to stop this.
They want to know everything about them and have a desire for more information. Celebrities should have their right to privacy due to historical/practical rights, their invasion of privacy with paparazzi, and their childrens’ rights to privacy. They are ordinary people just with a famous role in life. Historical/practical rights are one of the biggest issues and it all started back in colonial America. In colonial America, privacy was constrained.