Anonymity In Rape Cases

1610 Words4 Pages

Rape complainants and rape suspects and/or defendants were afforded anonymity in 1976 by The Sexual Offences (Amendment) Act. This act sought to guard innocent defendants from the inevitable stigma stemming from being accused of rape. It also aimed to create equality between the two parties. Rape suspects and/or defendants lost their entitlement to anonymity in 1988. Nonetheless, there has still been widespread debate about whether defendant anonymity should be restored. The coalition government proposed to “extend anonymity in rape cases to defendants” . However, they were unsuccessful. A poll conducted by the Independent suggested that three in four of the respondents believed that anonymity in rape cases should be afforded to defendants. …show more content…

The anonymity is imposed right from the time they make a complaint and lasts the rest of their lives. It is a criminal offence for the media or indeed a member of the public, to reveal a rape complainant’s identity. Ten people in the Ched Evan’s were fined for revealed the identity of the victim. One of the reasons for introducing anonymity for rape complainants was that "public knowledge of the indignity which [the complainant] has suffered in being raped may be extremely distressing and even positively harmful, and the risk of such public knowledge can operate as a severe deterrent to bringing proceedings” (The Heliborn Committee). There are very limited circumstances in which a complainant’s anonymity will be lifted. These include when the complainant herself, decides to waive her right to anonymity or when the court believes that by doing so, it will encourage other potential witnesses to come …show more content…

Speaking of her experience she stated that the “stigma attached to this crime is like no other. She has ruined our lives, yet she stays anonymous” . Stigma is especially prevalent in cases involving children. The Heliborn committee suggested that "current research indicates that between 5% and 7% of persons arrested for child abuse related offences commit suicide". Those who oppose a change in the law which would see rape defendant’s identities concealed argue that the public are more than capable of understanding the notion of “innocent until proven guilty”. However, rape can be very difficult to prove. This is because a high proportion of rapes take place in a person’s home and the perpetrator is often known to the victim, for example, studies suggest that 58% of rape perpetrators were the victim’s friend, date, colleague or acquaintance. For the prosecution to succeed there must be a meticulous examination of consent and because there are often no other witnesses to a rape apart from the victim herself, often it will be a case of who do the jury believe. This could imply to the public that the reasoning for acquittal was merely insufficient evidence or

More about Anonymity In Rape Cases

Open Document