Animal Testing Is Cruel And Inhumane

826 Words2 Pages

Animal testing is a phrase that most people have heard but perhaps still unsure of what exactly is involved. Laboratories test cosmetic products and medications on animals to understand how the human body works. Rabbits, guinea pigs, and hamsters are used for laboratory experiments, which they all suffer during each medical procedure. Those who support animal testing may define it as an experiment that uses animals to benefit humans, where it saves lives and provides vital medical treatment. Regardless, animals deserve to live a life without being tortured. What makes animals the right “subject” for testing? Experimenting on animals is cruel, laboratories perform unnecessary tests, alternative testing methods now exist that replace the needs …show more content…

In the 1700s an English philosopher Jeremy Bentham wrote, “The question is not, can they reason? Nor, can they talk? But, can they suffer?” Animals can suffer like humans do, they can feel pain. Companies use laboratories to test their products, which can be dangerous and cause serve pain on animals. Cosmetic companies use their products on animals to evaluate irritation caused by shampoo and other products. The products can damage their skin, hearing, and sight. Cosmetic companies use clips to keep the rabbits’ eyelids open for several days, so they cannot blink away the products being tested. Many experiments utilize restraining devices to prevent an animal from moving. Some experiments are designed to hold an animal in partial or total immobilization for months. Animals in labs suffer not only pain from experiments, but also suffers serve stress from the laboratory life. They spend their lives in small cages where they are unable to move and make choices also surrounded with bright lights and loud noises. “In 2009, an undercover lab investigation revealed monkeys frantically spinning around and around in their cages, biting open wounds, mutilating themselves, and ripping out their own hair, all because of the chronic psychological distress they must endure” (neavs). This is not a life a living being should have to go through. People think animals don’t suffer, and that is scientifically necessary. In fact, they do suffer and …show more content…

One of the alternative methods is called vitro testing, it allows researchers to use human cells and study the cell structure in a petri dish. It can produce more relevant results than animal testing. Using technology is another way to avoid animal testing. It has advanced over the years, instead of experimenting on live animals, researchers may able to use existing data to create very accurate simulation that can be run repeatedly. Physical simulations such as artificial tissues and organs has rapidly improved and it will allow scientists to conduct hands-on experiments without animals. A biotechnology company called Empiriko invented synthetic livers which can predict the liver’s metabolic reactions to drugs. The company discovered that this invention is quicker, cheaper, and more accurate than animal testing. Not only it saves money and time, it saves more lives. For example, one trial provided accurate information which would have required testing on 1,000 rats and 100 dogs. It is a shame that we must allow so many animals to go through so much pain and stress when the test can be down in one trial. Another reason why companies should invest in the alternative testing methods is the cost of animal testing. Traditional testing and toxicity studies on animals that require the use of hundreds of laboratory animals, which make these studies

Open Document