Ancient China's Caste System Essay

663 Words2 Pages

The top of the hierarchy were the emperor's officials who originated from wealthy families that owned much land. No matter what the emperor did, Landowners were a major part of this structure as well, as well as a major part of society. The most populous portion of the civilization was the peasant class. There were peasants that could survive, and those that could barely survive. Merchants were seen negatively as rich people who did absolutely nothing to better society. Emperor and High Authority VS Landowners: Landlord coup avoided paying taxes which weakened the state and hurt the peasants, as well as challenging the emperor's authority through force by the military /// State Officials and Landowners VS Peasants: Landowners collected obscene rents from working peasants, and the state made them pay taxes like other working …show more content…

The Jatis split the Varnas into social classes based upon occupation, creating thousands of new classes. Jatis were the new social structure beyond family. The caste system was religious status based, WHile china elevates politics as the elite classes go to the highest positions in government. The caste system divided indian society into many, many different groups. The caste system was more rigid and definitive than that of China's system Slaves were outsiders that were not even on a social level, and were to be bought and sold. Slaves had no rights, identity or pay. Some slaves could buy their freedom and rights. Some slaves children were free and had citizen rights at their birth Greco Roman society was more slave dependant and based than that of any other second wave civilization to this date. There were more slaves than in other second wave civilizations, and they could participate in far more occupations than forced unpaid labor unlike other second wave civilizations. They could be prestigious, or vulgar garbage, they could do anything but serve the

More about Ancient China's Caste System Essay

Open Document