Analyzing Kirov's Assassination Of Stalin

1152 Words3 Pages

Stalin’s purges and show trials gained him complete control over the three components necessary in order to secure his position as a totalitarian dictator: the military, the masses, and the government, making them a political necessity when considering the precarious power struggle in the Soviet Union. By the mid-1930s, Stalin had rose to the highest position of power in the Soviet Union, and had an understanding of the efficacy of purges from his period of dekulakization earlier in the decade, which not only killed the kulaks who were most dangerous to him, but intimidated others into submission. However, he still needed to contend with internal dissent from politicians, artists, and peasants. This led to the undertaking of the Great Purge …show more content…

Leading up to 1934, Kirov began to question more and more of Stalin’s dogma; in 1934, this led to a serious political rift between the two. In the early evening of December 1, 1934, Sergei Kirov was shot and killed by Leonid Nikolayev. It is not known if this assassination was orchestrated by Stalin. However, Robert Conquest describes Kirov as Stalin’s perfect victim, saying that while he was thought of as a strict Stalinist by the people of the Soviet Union, his views had begun to differ significantly from those of Stalin and his government. As a result of this, he became Stalin’s perfect murder victim; he could falsely indict many for a crime against a “loyal” state official, while eliminating an enemy in the process. Stalin also had the ability to conspire with Genrikh Yagoda, the head of the Russian secret police (the NKVD), and the NKVD was responsible for Kirov’s security at the time of his death. Despite Stalin having the means and motive to commit such a crime, no evidence has presently been found that could aid in forming a conclusive argument pointing to Stalin’s guilt. However, Robert W. Thurston argued that the level of Stalin’s involvement in the murder was unimportant to a degree when compared to how Stalin actually manipulated the public image of the event to suit his purposes. On the very same day, Stalin instituted a policy that called for those accused of crimes against Stalin or his regime to be swiftly executed by the secret police. This was how Stalin laid the groundwork for years of state terrorism to come. He had taken the rights of criminals, particularly those who challenged him politically, and gained the ability to execute practically anyone in the Soviet Union at any time. As a result of Kirov’s murder, Stalin was able to gain the political authority and set up the

More about Analyzing Kirov's Assassination Of Stalin

Open Document