Analysis Of Susan Donnelly's Poem Inoculation

436 Words1 Page

Susan Donnelly’s poem “Inoculation” explores the comparison between sin, disease, and slavery, and initially, this connection is nonexistent to one of two characters: Cotton Mather. This piece opens by stating, “Cotton Mather studied small pox for a while, instead of sin,” and automatically there is implanted the idea that disease and sin are independent of each other; this diction is imperative for Donnelly because it gives the vantage point of Mather prior to discussing the small pox outbreak with his slave, Onesimus. The blatant introduction makes it clear by the end of the poem how terribly wrong Mather was in his ideology of a separation between small pox and sin: the topic of his studies does not change, unlike the claim of his first belief. …show more content…

To which Onesimus replied, ‘Yes and No.’” With this, the theme is only partially established, yet without the final lines of the poem, the slave sounds as if spewing nonsense at Cotton Mather. To elaborate, Onesimus explains that, while he had small pox, he quite obviously survived, despite the fact he should not have after having “take[n] inside all manner of [the] disease.” It is with the conclusion of the poem that the connections are formed and the theme is resolved and established. These final lines read, “My mother bore me in the southern wild. She scratched my skin and I got sick, but lived to come here, free of smallpox, as your

Open Document