2013 2014
1. Liquidity Ratio: Current Ratio
= current asset
Current liability 1,180 = 4.291
275 1,140 =5.700
200
Acid Test Ratio
= current asset-inventory
Current liability 1,180-600 = 2.109
275 1,140-580 =2.800
200
Cash ratio
= cash+cash equivalent
Current liability 305+165+500 = 3.527
275 270+305+500 =5.375
200
Inventory turnover
= sales inventory 1,100 = 1.833
600 1,330 = 2.293
580
Average Collection period
= accounts receivable sales x 365 275 = 91 days
1,100x365 290 = 79 days
1,330x365
2. Capital Structure: Total Debt ratio
=Total liability x100
Total Asset 500+275 x100 = 32.563
2,380 500+200 = 22.226
2,480
Debt to equity ratio
=Total liability
Total Asset 775 = 48.287
1,605 775 = 39.326
1,780
Time interest
…show more content…
This shows that Salcon’s has reduced their liabilities. Liabilities can be considered as a hurdle , Salcon’s hurdles to attain optimum profit by having less liabilities is an indication that their business is growing in a positive way.
b) Acid Test
…show more content…
Such as current ratio , inventory turnover,acid test ratio,average collection period,fixed asset turnover,debt ratio,operating profit margin and net profit margin.However ,weakness of the firms consists of, time interest earned ratio, operating income return,total asset turnover and return of total sales and return of equity. This summarizes as most of the financial ratio analysis has been increasing which means the company is expanding as its growth in financial terms. This clearly shows that the company is a good candidate to be approved to receive loan . this is because , by calculating the ratio we can see the company has improved in certain areas that shows wether the company has a bright future or not. Therefore , the results of the calculation is a proof that guarantees , Salcon can generste sales , pay their debts and in a fast
The Corporation has sustained losses and negative cash flows from operations since its inception. The Corporation is exposed to liquidity risk as it continues to have net cash outflows to support its operations.
Using the 5 different ratio analysis used earlier to analyse BMO life insurance company’s Q2-2015 Consolidated Income statement and Q2-2015 Consolidated Balance sheet. BMO’s profit margin is 9.79%1. Meaning BMO earns more net income per $1 of sales than some or even most of its competitors. This can be rated as favorable in comparison to its industry average of 9.58%. BMO’s days’ sales uncollected is 21.84days2 favorable when compared to its industry’s average of 98.59 days. This means that BMO can liquidate it receivables in lesser days than some or most of its competitors. BMO’s equity ratio shows that the owners of the company only owns 10.66%3 of the company’s assets. Compared to its industry
Select any five (5) financial ratios that you have learned about in the text. Analyze the past three (3) years of the company’s financial data, which you may obtain from the company’s financial statements. Determine the company’s financial health.
Financial Strength (mrq) -. Quick Ratio 0.49 Current Ratio 1.46 LT Debt/Equity 110.07 Total Debt/Equity 118.25 Mgt. Effectiveness (ttm) - a. Return on Investment % 13.23%. Return on Assets % 9.09%. Return on Equity % 25.77%.
Cash Flow Statement Eastman Kodak’s cash flow statement shows that cash has decreased every year except for 2012 (Nasdaq, 2015). The reason for this is that the company sold $90,000 of its capital assets and also issued a large amount of debt (Nasdaq, 2015). In 2013 Kodak repaid $811,000 of their debt, this was different from any of the other years (Nasdaq, 2015). They may have done this since 2013 was the only year with a positive net income. Each year from 2011 to 2014, Kodak purchased capital assets (Nasdaq, 2015).
...rs, setting a good trend for the corporation. They also have a very low debt-to-equity ratio, indicating that they have enough equity to easily pay off any funds acquired from creditors. As a creditor I would feel safe in lending them funds for any future projects or endeavors.
The ratio of 1.7 for the last two years indicates consistency, although a lower number is preferred. As a company produces high value product, this could be a satisfactory ratio. By comparing it to 2011 when a ratio was 2.9, in the last two years a ratio improved
Credit Risk: Financial instruments that possibly subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist of cash equivalents and receivables. Due to its large and varied customer base and its geographic diversity, Saputo has low exposure to credit risk concentration with respect to customer’s receivables. There are no receivables from any individual customer that exceeded 10% of the total balance of receivables as at March 31, 2015 and March 31, 2014. However one customer represented more than 10% of total consolidated sales for the year ended March 31, 2015, with 10.2% (one customer with 11.4% in 2014). Allowance for doubtful accounts and past due receivables are reviewed by management at each balance sheet date. The company updates its estimate of the allowance for doubtful accounts based on the assessment of the recoverability of receivable balances from each customer taking into account historic collection trends of past due accounts. Receivables are written off once determined not to be collectible. On average, Saputo will generally have 10% of receivables that are due beyond normal terms, but are not decreased. However, Saputo management does not believe that these allowances
ADCT's debt/equity ratios are 17.7% 24.5, 24.7, 42.2 and 34.0 for 1995-1999. There are no comparison ratios. There was a dramatic increase in 1998. This increase reflects ADCT's 1998 decision to sell additional stock in the NASDAQ exchange. ADCT has used the raised capitol to invest in operating activities and is reflected in the reduction of this ratio in 1999.
Upon examining P&G’s financial ability to meet short-term obligations, it is apparent that not only have their current liabilities exceeded current assets over the last three years, but close to half of their current assets have been tied up in inventories and other illiquid assets. For example, assessing both the quick and current ratio respectively shows that less than 70% of the firm’s current assets could be converted immediately to pay current commitments, but a little more than 90% of the firm’s liabilities would ultimately be covered. Though, based on industry average similar findings occur; therefore, it must not be uncommon for industries similar to P&G to
Ratios traditionally measure the most important factors such as liquidity, solvency and profitability, as well as other measures of solvency. Different studies have found various ratios to be the most efficient indicators of solvency. Studies of ratio analysis began in the 1930’s, with several studies of the concluding that firms with the potential to file bankruptcy all exhibited different ratios than those companies that were financially sound. Among the study’s findings were that the deciding factor of the predictor of bankruptcy should not be only a few ratios, as the measure of a company’s financial solvency may differ as the firm’s situations differ. The important question is to which ratios are to be used and of those ratios chosen, which ratios are given priority weight.
Organizations use financial statements and ratio analysis assess financial performance viability. The ratio analysis are used to identify trends and to perform organizational comparison (financial) with other companies within same industry. Ratio analysis, using data reported on the financial statements, are divided into five major categories: common size, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, and profitability. This paper will assess the financial stability of John Hopkins Hospital (JHH) using the five ratio analysis.
Coca –Cola (KO) is one of the world’s largest beverage companies. Company was incorporated in September 1919 under the State of Delaware law and headquarters is located in Atlanta Georgia. But from 1886, company established its brand in US (Coca-Cola, 2012, p. 1). Currently company is providing for more than 500 varieties of non-alcoholic sparkles to the customers around the world. Apart from this, company also serve for still beverages that includes enhanced water, water, ready-to-drink, juices, energy drink, sport drinks and so on.
Any successful business owner or investor is constantly evaluating the performance of the companies they are involved with, comparing historical figures with its industry competitors, and even with successful businesses from other industries. To complete a thorough examination of any company's effectiveness, however, more needs to be looked at than the easily attainable numbers like sales, profits, and total assets. Luckily, there are many well-tested ratios out there that make the task a bit less daunting. Financial ratio analysis helps identify and quantify a company's strengths and weaknesses, evaluate its financial position, and shows potential risks. As with any other form of analysis, financial ratios aren't definitive and their results shouldn't be viewed as the only possibilities. However, when used in conjuncture with various other business evaluation processes, financial ratios are invaluable. By examining Ford Motor Company's financial ratios, along with a few other company factors, this report will give a clear picture of how the company is doing now and should do in the future.
The debt used to acquire Salomon has been an important issue for the finances of the company. Although financially storng and unlikely to default, the company needs to look into reducing its debt to increase its profitability.