Analysis Of Niall Richardson's The Gospel According To Spider-Man

789 Words2 Pages

Temptation, guilt, and good intentions: many associate these terms with the Bible but few with Spiderman. Niall Richardson is one of the few. He wrote, “The Gospel According to Spider-Man,” published in 2004 it compares the world of Spider-Man to that of a biblical allegory. Namely, that of Christ being tempted by the Devil after weeks of fasting in the desert. Through his use of biblical imagery and quotations Richardson successfully draws a parallel between the Bible and Spider-Man even though some of his further claims ultimately fall flat.
Richardson begins building his argument by surrounding the “superhero narrative” with biblical fact by discussing common beliefs held in the Christian religion. He then continues to align Spiderman’s actions with that of the idea of temptation and contrasts this to the innate goodness of Superman. That Superman’s unwavering generosity poses him as the idealized hero, while Spiderman’s lust and selfish desires make him a more unconventional one. Richardson continues to push this idea by positing that it is Peter Parker’s Christian sense of shame and guilt that pushes him to do the good that he does, and as such pushes both Christians and
The brunt of this success is due to foundation Richardson builds at the beginning of the essay that carries his argument to the end. His illustrative use of compare and contrast is another one of his more powerful literary tools that increases the efficacy of his examples in the early sections of the essay. Ultimately, Richardson’s decisions successfully paint Spider-Man as a Biblical allegory in the minds of his readers, but what about you? The next time you watch The Amazing Spider-Man will you be judging Peter Parker’s moral integrity or accept his repentance at the end of the movie? Or, will you simply continue to see as just that, a

Open Document