Dr. Martin Luther King Junior's Letter from Birmingham Jail

1100 Words3 Pages

The “Letter from Birmingham Jail,” was a letter written from a solitary confinement cell of Birmingham Jail in Birmingham, Alabama, by Dr. Martin Luther King Junior. It was said that King’s Lawyer had smuggled bits and pieces of the letter which was written on scraps of paper from the jail. The letter was said to have been written on April 16, 1963 during which time terror against African Americans were so bad in Birmingham during the summer, that it was referred to as Bombingham. Martin Luther King Jr. was arrested during his participation in a non-violent anti-segregation march. The reason for arrest was said to be due to the fact that he did not have the proper permit that was required to have a parade. In King’s letter, he recognized and …show more content…

(180) In the second half of King’s letter, he takes on more of a prophetic tone, he maintains a subject that mixes both moral and legal functions. In result, King calls a detachment between morality and law a kind of …show more content…

King’s ongoing attacks on the contemporary church comes down to a forewarning about taking in the status quo for the reason of comfort. Bearing in mind the many variances Dr. King makes in the first half of the letter among the individual’s moral sense and the group’s harmful impact, his proposal that the church serves aids the group is rather severe. In reality, Dr. King’s vision of the church is one of rebellious minds that wish to adjust the world into a holier setting, in which men convey their more suitable angels short of fear of retaliation. Dr. King’s assail asserts that the church has not only lost its inventive, extremist spirit, but has become a social institution in itself. His attack on the church declares in no unknown terms that he is not an issue because he is an “extremist,” but that rather the Church is in risk because it itself is not “extremist” enough. “Letter from Birmingham Jail” as an incongruous text in that it is never one thing. Dr. King refuses to be either a lecturer or preacher, student or teacher, hero or victim, yet all of the above mentioned at once. He accepts the refutations innate in himself, his cause, and his oppressors, well understanding that by addressing tension he and mankind will proceed to

Open Document