Analysis Of Daniel Keyes's 'Flowers For Algernon'

866 Words2 Pages

When the world looks down on you for not having what you have always wanted, you become lonelier than it seems, surrounded by millions of people. If you could get what you work so hard for, where is the harm in that? In “Flowers for Algernon”, by Daniel Keyes, there is a man with a low IQ named Charlie, his whole life he has wanted to be smart. Charlie then had a chance of being more intelligent. Needy for intelligence, he took the surgery that changed his and the life of others. It was good that Charlie took the surgery because he was more aware and generally happier. Although, others argue that he should not have taken the surgery because it took a negative toll on his well being and life. After Charlie took the surgery, he gradually became more intelligent and ultimity more aware of the world around him. Thus, he began to understand the cruel actions of his friends. As his so called …show more content…

As he began to lose his innocence after the surgery people began to notice his awareness. His coworkers found his changes strange and they created a petition to make him leave. The one person who did not sign the petition still agreed that his awareness and change was bad. Fanny Girden exclaimed it was evil that Eve “saw that she was naked. If not for that none of us would ever have to grow old and sick, and die” (Keyes 16). She believes that his ignorance was a bliss. That his basic life was enough for him and he should not have been greedy for more. Although living blindly is not always right. Charlie deserves to understand how his friends treat him rather than blindly following them. He deserves to obtain more intelligence although it would only last a while because he always works so hard. Primarily, it was worth giving Charlie a taste of what he was always wanted instead of keeping it away from

Open Document