Analysis Of Claude M. Steele's Whistling Vivaldi

1087 Words3 Pages

Claude M. Steele is the author of “ Whistling Vivaldi”, which mainly represents that the meaning of identity contingencies and stereotype threat, and how can these effect people’s ideas and behaviors. By writing this article, Steele tries to make people know exist of identity contingencies. Gina Crosley-Corcoran, who is a white woman suffered the poverty in her childhood. Through describing her miserable experiences in parallel construction to motivate readers sympathize her, moreover approving that she can as a powerful evidence for affirming the impact of identity contingencies. Crosley-Corcoran admits the white privilege really exist in some way in her article “ Explaining White Privilege to a Broke White Person”, and white privilege …show more content…

Steele makes a definition of stereotype threat that “This means that whenever we’re in a situation where a bad stereotype about one of our own identities could be applied to us”. For example, people always thinks that black people are dangerous; white people have a worse “natural athletic ability” than black people; Female are not good at math. These examples mean that identity contingencies always makes people have a constant impression of the kind of group people, but sometimes, these impression are not truth. Crosley-Corcoran says, “ So when that feminist told me I had “white privilege,” I told her that my white skin didn’t do shit to prevent me from experiencing poverty.” Here, she uese emotional strategy to express her disapproval of the feminist thought that she gets a lot benefits from white privilege. People always think that white people have privilege than black people, so white people have a better live circumstance than black people. However, according to Crosley-Corcoran poor situation, she doesn’t like other rich white people can have a comfortable circumstance to live because she doesn’t have enough money. Here, this thing also proved that identity …show more content…

Furthermore, she also through writing some contrast test to prove that identity contingencies not just affect black people’s lives, but also has the ability to influence white people, male, female, young, old, and so on. However, Crosley-Corcoran as a white person who admits in her article that white privilege really exists and provides her kind of benefits which is inborn and black people have no chance to gain. Because of her identity is a white person, so her talking is a powerful and effective evidence to reinforce Steele’s argument that “identity contingencies—the things you have to deal with in a situation because you have a given social identity, because you are old, young, gay, a white male, a woman, black, Latino, politically conservative or liberal, diagnosed with bipolar disorder, a cancer patient and so

Open Document