An Enemy Of The People

1340 Words3 Pages

The roles of women have been dynamic throughout history. Artists during the 19th century frequently noticed the changes in the lives of women during their time. Authors, including Henrik Ibsen, and painters, such as Edgar Degas and Gustave Caillebotte depicted the broad changes in women’s lives due to the beginnings of modernity. In Henrik Ibsen’s An Enemy of the People, Petra represents the modern woman through being independent and free thinking, and the women in the paintings of Edgar Degas and Gustave Caillebotte tell a different story of being defined by their class and gender despite everyone walking along the same streets. In An Enemy of the People, Thomas Stockmann works to save his town in Norway from water poisoning before it is …show more content…

Hovstad has been one of her father’s largest supporters and is considering posting her father’s findings about the town’s water in the newspaper. Petra refuses, citing the fact that she doesn’t agree with the idea of a ‘higher power’ presented in the article. After explaining this to Hovstad, the two begin talking about her father. Hovstad explains that it is easy to support her father because he’s attracted to her, and when she tries to reject him, threatens that “...[her] father can’t dispense with [his] help” (Enemy, Act 3, 141). Petra is appalled and leaves the office immediately without allowing Hovstad to backpedal and explain himself. There are two reasons presented as to why Petra truly represents the modern woman: her rejection of religion and her rejection of a man who could easily give her and her father power. Petra continues to be a free thinker, refusing to accept the idea of a higher power controlling her life. Lutheranism, specifically Pietism, was the dominant religion in the Norway of Ibsen’s time, and being open about one’s atheism was a bold move. Petra also rejects Hovstad, and in a sense rejects traditional power-based relationships. She is independent and, unwilling to be objectified, makes that very clear. Independence is truly the mark of the modern woman, but perhaps only to well-off women such as …show more content…

In the foreground, a very well-dressed man and woman walk down the sidewalk. The woman doesn’t need to pull her skirt off of the sidewalk because she is wealthy enough not to care about it getting dirty or ragged and can buy a new one if needed. She has a veil draped over her face. Her coat has fur along the trim. Based on her dress, she is a distinguished woman of class who doesn’t need to worry about money. Behind her, two working women walk while holding up their skirts so as not to muddy them. Unlike the woman in the foreground, the two working women have to be careful with their outfits because they cannot afford new ones (Wisotzki, Lecture). Modern women are still divided by class, but they are able to walk the same streets. Previously, classes were divided into separate neighborhoods. In Haussmannized Paris, the classes live among each other in the same buildings. For women, this didn’t have as many changes as it did for

Open Document