Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Alternative energy solutions to fossil fuels
Alternate forms of energy vs. fossil fuels
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Alternative energy solutions to fossil fuels
Clean energy independence is becoming a major priority in the modern world. Increasing population has caused a major demand for energy independence and reliability. Non-renewable resources will eventually run out and cause energy prices to skyrocket, which will destroy the worlds infrastructure. Investing in clean energy will have a beneficial impact on our economy through job creation, energy independence, and increased investing. This must be dealt with soon, because if it is not, it will only become an even bigger problem. Clean energy investment will increase job opportunity. The Obama administration has taken the initiative to do this, through the Stimulus Program and the American Clean Energy and Security Act. These programs alone are estimated to create about 1.7 million new job opportunities, even with the projected job loss from non-renewable resource cuts. These new jobs would lower The United States’ unemployment rate by a full 1%. Investing in clean energy would generate three times as many jobs by switching from non-renewable to renewable energy sources ("The Economic Benefits of Investing in Clean Energy"). Increased employment means less people relying on the government which would lower taxes and, in turn, allow Americans to keep more of their money. This would increase consumer spending. In order to make sure the economy can continue to grow, it is a priority to secure energy independence. The many known natural sources of energy, such as sunlight, can provide substantial amounts of renewable power. This energy diversity can allow regions many options of energy production if they do not have a certain one. These sources could produce around 482,247 billion kilowatt-hours of clean and renewable energy, which is roughly 118 times the energy the United States uses alone ("Benefits of Renewable Energy Use | UCSUSA"). This clean energy abundance will destroy the need for costly conflicts and imports of oil. Decreased spending on homeland security and oil imports would dramatically reduce the debt (17.5 Trillion) and be well worth investment in clean energy. Clean energy investment will send the energy industry through the roof and grow the economy. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act and the Clean Energy and Security Act will also generate around 150 billion dollars in clean energy investments. This major spending is mainly coming from private sector investors. The U.S. Government has also subsidized many programs such as clean energy transportation ("The Economic Benefits of Investing in Clean Energy"). All of these new programs will promote investing in the clean energy sector, which will cause companies to compete and grow the economy.
According to Brendan Smith, in his article “5 Reasons Why the Keystone Pipeline is bad for the Economy”, the project will have negative effects on the country’s economy. He argues that, building the pipeline will harm the economy because its impacts on the environment are costly and it will force the citizens and the government to pay the price. He continues by stating that the project will reduce jobs in the country because the fossil fuel industry had slashed its workforce. Smith points out that the effects of the project will be felt mostly by the poor people because they will not manage to cope with the adverse climate brought about by the increased use of fossil fuel. Moving on, he argues that the Keystone Pipeline will not sustain the economy because it cannot create more jobs in the country (Smith n.p). This is because a sustainable economy is one that creates more jobs...
The reliance on other countries for fossil fuels that produce energy have put the United States of America at risk of being pulled into unstable regions around the world jeopardizing international relationships and putting its own citizens in harm’s way. America needs to balance both the pursuit of alternative energy solutions and reduce energy usage. Our military runs on fossil fuels produced by other nations who do not have similar interests or values as the United States, ultimately adding unwanted risk that becomes difficult to manage. There are advantages to alternative energy solutions that could allow for America to become an independent energy nation that would eliminate the need to support and stabilize various regions around the world. The U.S. Military needs to reduce its overall energy usage by taking advantage of breakthrough technologies that could be integrated onto current systems.
However, the negative side effects such as contaminated water and air, make hydraulic fracturing a process that may not be worth the benefits. One benefit of hydrofracking is that it creates job in the current economic slump that America is in. The increase of hydraulic fracturing in the United States directly benefits the citizens, with the number of employees i... ... middle of paper ... ...
increasing the supply of renewable energy would allow us to replace carbon-intensive energy sources and significantly reduce U.S. global warming emissions… a 25 percent by 2025 national renewable electricity standard would lower power plant CO2 emissions 277 million metric tons annually by 2025—the equivalent of the annual output from 70 typical (600 MW) new coal plants (“Benefits of Renewable Energy
The purpose of this paper is to review the Department of Energy's (DOE) programs and recommend future directions for US policy to address President Obama's desire to save our planet from climate change and reduce reliance on oil (Roberts, Lassiter, & Nanda, 2010, p 4). The context of this review is following the 2008 election of President Obama and the enactment of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (Recovery Act) in February 2009. This paper will evaluate the effectiveness of the measures implemented by the Act and compare their effectiveness with an alternative strategy of implementing a carbon tax, then make a recommendation on which strategy would have achieved the President's aims in view of the political, economic and environmental situation that he faced.
...s many untapped resources that the government has kept businesses from taking advantage of. I believe a reduction in restrictions could lead to economic growth as seen in other states that have used fracking to bring in large amounts of growth.
United States is known for their innovation towards alternative energy like solar power, wind power and nuclear power. However , these alternative energies are not completely beneficial towards the United States. For example, Hydrofracking; What is hydrofracking? Gas industries use hydrofracking to extract natural gases from shale ground in order to power Americans homes. When gas industries hydrofrack, they dig ten-thousand feet into the mantle of the earth and turn perpendicular to the t into shale layers with cement and steel casing to prevent leaks.
... middle of paper ... ... Due to the recent economic struggles in the U.S., it is important that we maintain economic competitiveness with other countries. Instead of importing oil, the U.S. should invest in clean-energy technology innovation, which would boost growth and create jobs.
Alternative energy sources are renewable, and is most commonly referred to as free energy sources. There are many alternative energy sources such as hydro power, solar power, wind, biomass, and geothermal. Using alternative sources is more expensive in the long run, but it is the much safer option for our environment compared to fossil fuels. Although everything used is completely free, such as water and wind, the equipment used to generate these things are expensive. There are several pros and cons that come with the utilization of alternative energy sources.
ways. The use of electricity will reduces the usage of the earth’s resources such as gas and oil.
Skye mentions, “Every year, power plants in the US alone put more than 2.5 million tons of CO2, a major greenhouse gas, into the atmosphere. Fossil fuels are also responsible for a significant amount of land, water, and air pollution beyond their CO2 production” (Skye 1). The United States moving towards using renewable energy resources we can reduce pollution, decrease global warming emissions, create new job opportunities, and make strides to clean up our planet. The government has already started putting programs in place to help the United States move towards using renewable energy resources. In the article, “Status of Renewable Energy Systems in the United States,” describes one of the programs put into place such as, “A renewable portfolio standard (RPS) is a policy that requires electricity retailers to provide a minimum percentage or quantity of their electricity supplies from renewable energy sources and provides U.S. states with a mechanism to increase renewable energy generation” (Peterson 3). With the help of the RPS policy more states are moving towards renewable energy. Twenty-nine states are using the RPS policy and seven states are making non-mandatory renewable energy goals. Another way the government is offering incentives to help generate interest in renewable resources
Fossil fuels are an important part of life. When you turn on the lights, watch TV, or take a shower, the electricity that you are using is being generated by fossil fuels. The three types of fossil fuels are coal, crude oil, and natural gas. They all take millions of years to form, so they are considered to be “non-renewable”- eventually, the fossil fuels will all be used up. One dangerous biological effect of using fossil fuels is ocean acidification. Extracting and transporting fossil fuels can also be very dangerous. Environmentally damaging accidents such as groundwater contamination, land subsidence, and oil spills occur frequently. Global warming is another possible environmental effect. Fossil fuels have a crucial role in modern society, but since they are non-renewable and dangerous, we should reduce our dependence on them and explore alternative energy sources. Wind energy, hydroelectricity, and solar energy are some examples of renewable fuel sources. There are also many things that people can do everyday to save energy (and, in turn, conserve fossil fuels).
Imposing Green Taxes on the carbon content in fuel will help in alleviating the strain on our environment. If the federal government could come up with more stringent carbon laws that impose taxes on carbon emitting fuels or resources that greatly impact the environment, it will help change how big business today operate. With our nations large appetite for natural resources and while this compliments their ongoing destruction to the environment, the US is one of the largest polluters, our government can set a standard for how companies should pay for their impact on the environment. Taxes on energy will lead to the true cost of resources and the innovation of new technology which will allow for lower emissions.
With the depletion of fossil fuel resources comes speculations and debates about alternative energy sources. The world, including the Philippines, is practically dependent on a dwindling non-renewable source of energy. Today, experts are debating about and considering three options: Nuclear, Solar, or Wind Energy. Everyone has been accustomed to the bad image of nuclear energy as a result of the Chernobyl and Fukushima incidents above all others. The popular belief is that radiation from a nuclear meltdown is very harmful to humans and other living things—which is true—and that nuclear power plants are very dangerous and not ideal—which is not. According to Smith, et. al (n.d), all the nuclear disasters that ever occurred were caused by human error and natural disasters like tsunamis, not one because of system failure. Putting the false beliefs aside, with proper engineering and adequate maintenance by experts, a nuclear power plant is a very ideal and viable source of energy for the following reasons:
In addition to, a huge issue with non-renewable energy is the fact that we get most of it from foreign countries. According to a recent study done by Energy Information Administration, “58% of our petroleum comes from outside the country”, this means as some speculate, that o...