Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Economics theory: Influences on Greenspan's decision making
Economics theory: Influences on Greenspan's decision making
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Former Chairman of the Federal Reserve Alan Greenspan has played a key role in the economic crisis of the late 2000s (some would point out that we are still experiencing its aftershocks to this day). It’s not so much what Greenspan did as much as what he didn’t do. Greenspan’s hesitation when it comes to regulating the banking sector was motivated in part by the free-market philosophy he has propagated over his career as a leading world economist. It must be pointed out, however, that there are those who believe that Greenspan’s arms were seemingly tied behind his back by the overwhelming influence of the elite on Wall Street and the aforementioned banking sector. Robert Gnaizda of the Greenlining Institute — a non-profit public advocacy group that fights for equality for people of color as well as the underprivileged — met with Greenspan in 2004 to discuss this matter but was met by a blatant lack of interest on Greenspan’s part. Was this lack of interest due to sticking firm to his longstanding free-market beliefs, or was it the acceptance that he had no actual power to stand up to larger powers at work?
These days Greenspan has taken a sharp turn and decided to alter his views on the free-market. He admits that he along with many fellow economists misjudged the potential for crisis. Clearly this so-called error in judgement was profoundly influential in allowing the elite to accumulate massive amounts of wealth over his years not only as the Chairman of the Federal Reserve, but also in his other highly influential positions. However, the economic success under his watch turned out to be no more than bubbles (he also presided over the housing and dot-com fiascos), and like any bubble, it is bound to eventually burst. That is ...
... middle of paper ...
... freedom, the kind of power and freedom that allows one to live like a tyrant, the lure of more money and power will inevitably turn tragic. It should be the responsibly of our government to prevent this from ever being the case. Finally, I would like to add that I do believe in a free-market society. I believe everyone should have to freedom to make as much money as they please. So long as they do not hurt anyone in the process, why shouldn’t a person or corporation be allowed to amass great wealth? The key, I believe, is regulation and creation. That is, regulate the most powerful so that their power does not corrupt them, and create more opportunities for ordinary citizens who have the work ethic and creativity to succeed. Nothing should be handed out for free, and hard work should indeed be rewarded, but how can one succeed if they lose before they even start?
struggle for the power of freedom might be just to be allowed to exist at all.
Money makes the world go around so that people could either become rich or poor. The whole issue with businesses came up in the 18th-19th century and was created by two factions in US history, the Robber Barons and the Captains of Industry. These two are what made the way America’s economy it is today. The Robber Barons and the Captains of industry were both very similar but completely different with how they operated in the economic world. Robber Barons made wealth in a variety of ways but still maintained the sense of thieves from the way they attained their wealth and treated their people hence forth their name. The Robber Barons were considered a unlikable form of business because of the effect they had a negative effect on the community. The Robber Barons whole idea and purpose was to make money for themselves by means of which is immoral to society. Most of the money collected by Robber Barons were taken from the people and their community further proving that they had gained a lot if not most of their wealth from the people without giving back to their town. The Robber Barons would also have their workers working in extremely harsh conditions that were harmful to their health and mental state, only to be made worse by the wages they were getting paid. These businesses refused to see their workers as people; instead they saw their workers as parts of a machine that can always be replaced. This was partially the fault of 'Social Darwinism'. This meant that the most fit would succeed to become rich while others would not. This idea was created by Andrew Carnegie, a businessman of the steel industry, although the first intention was to make sure that government would stay out of the affairs of big businesses. Carnegie, a Capta...
With freedom comes great responsibility. This saying has been heard by generations of kids and has been said by generations of parents. Unfortunately people today don?t seem to be responsible in certain things they do. You see things in media today that make you wonder when you draw the line on things you say and do. William Golding the author of Lord of The Flies conveys this thought in the story of the boys stuck on the island where they have complete freedom to do whatever they want to do. They no longer had adults to tell them what and how to do things. The story just proves that when people are irresponsible and freedom gets abused that very bad things can happen.
Overall, free market is a necessity if there is to be any forward movement and progression of society. In a controlled system nothing ever changes, and while this can prevent change for the worse, it also stunts change for the better. In free enterprise systems, people with brains and determination, such as Andrew Carnegie, are able to take advantage of new opportunities. While this system will not help individuals float along, and they are liable to sink (into debt and/or remorse), those who have the courage to try will find that success is only a risk
These are ambition and avarice; the love of power and the love of money.” This nature has been corrupt since the beginning of time, and Christianity proves that by Adam’s sin of eating of the forbidden tree and causing the world to be corrupt forever. Benjamin Franklin wants to let the world know that mankind is easily swayed by greed and generally earthly desires which are power and money, as stated. The only thing that men will drive after is power and money, because it is their passion, it is what they love. As long as they feel powerful and rich, that is what they live for. Because mankind is corrupted in this way, a government needs to be made to keep control of its people. Government is certainly not something that should be wanted in this world, but something that is certainly
Thomas Jefferson once stated, "When the people fear the government you have tyranny... when the government fears the people you have liberty." (http://www.chvanilla.net/frogquotes.html)
With the dawning of the 20th century came an emergence of social awareness as muckrakers, investigative journalists who were reform minded and generally wrote for popular magazines and newspapers that exposed the ills of society and corruption in the government, opened the blind eye of ignorant Americans to these issues. One of the first to strike was Lincoln Steffens as he exposed how city officials worked in league with big business to maintain power while corrupting the public treasury. It became clear to the government that reforms were desperately needed, and Theodore Roosevelt provided the nation with just that as he sought broad reforms and regulations at the national level during his presidency. Roosevelt utilized his domestic program, the “Square Deal”, to take action against bad trusts, or large monopolies like the Northern Securities Act as well as restrain the good trusts. He distinguished between these trusts, describing “good trusts” as good services that provide...
middle of paper ... ... In summation, I am more of a Keynesian thinker than a classical thinker. Although it might be true that having a free market is the right way of having a stable economy, unemployment will still be high and might be increasing which is still one of the problems that governments face today. Plus, what happens if recession hits or even worse we go back to 1930’s where there was the great depression, it was proved then and will be proved again if it happens that the only way to solve a sort of crisis is by government intervention (basically spending).
There is perhaps no other political issue in our contemporary society that is more pertinent, pervasive, and encompassing than a nation’s economy. From the first coins used in Greece and the Asia Minor in the 7th century BCE, to the earliest uses of paper money, history has proven time and time again that the control of a region’s economy is absolutely crucial to maintaining social stability and prosperity. Yet, for over a century scholars have continued to speculate why the United States, one of the world’s strongest and most influential countries, has one of the most unstable economies. Although the causes of this economic instability can be attributed to multiple factors, nearly all economists agree that they have a common ancestor: the Federal Reserve Bank – the official central bank of the United States. Throughout the course of this paper, I will attempt to determine whether or not there is a causal relationship between the Federal Reserve Bank’s monetary policies and the decline of the U.S. economy. I will do this through a brief analysis of the history and role of this institution, in addition to the central banking system in general. In turn, I will argue that the reckless and intentional manipulation of the economy by the Federal Reserve Bank, through inflation and the abolishment of the gold standard, has led to the current economic crisis in the United States.
In October of 1929, the American economy took a huge hit from the stock market crash. Since so much people had invested their money and time in the banks, when the banks closed many had lost all of their money and were in the deep poverty. Because of this, one of my first actions of the New Deal was the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). Every bank in the United States had to abide by this rule. This banking program I launched not only ensured the safety and protection of deposits made my users of banks, but had also restored America’s faith in banks, causing people to once again use banks which contributed in enriching the economy. Another legislation I was determined to get passed...
In the “Gospel of wealth”, Andrew Carnegie argues that it is the duty of the wealthy entrepreneur who has amassed a great fortune during their lifetime, to give back to those less fortunate. Greed and selfishness may force some readers to see these arguments as preposterous; however, greed is a key ingredient in successful competition. It forces competitors to perform at a higher level than their peers in hopes of obtaining more money and individual wealth. A capitalist society that allows this wealth to accumulate in the hands of the few might be beneficial to the human race because it could promote competition between companies; it might ensure health care for everyone no matter their social standing, and parks and recreation could be built for the enjoyment of society.
However, with great power comes great responsibility, and most governments that allow too much power will crack under the pressure and implant complete security to protect their power from being taken by another leader that is not their main choice, or by the public through revolution. A sensible country will not allow its government to achieve either, as both will affect the country significantly in a negative spotlight. However, balancing freedom and security doesn’t take away all the problems, as having the same amount of freedom and security is impossible in reality and will soon tip into either side, and having more security than freedom will make citizens protest outside and inside of the area of influence by the government, and the awareness created can lead to tragic aftermath. This is why having more freedom than security while allowing the government to regulate individual actions that can adversely affect others, as total security will lead to totalitarianism and tyranny, allowing more security over freedom will generate resentment, severe riot, and, total freedom will lead to chaos and anarchy. Everyone wants power in one way or another, no matter if it is used for good, bad, or in-between.... ...
Batra, Ravi. Greenspan's Fraud: How Two Decades of His Policies Have Undermined the Global Economy. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.
If one looks at liberty and individual freedom, it is evident that command economies tend to oppress their citizens. Therefore, socialism, which allows for basic needs to be met and personal freedoms to be upheld, is the best economic system for all of a country’s citizens. Market economies, as a whole, inherently and inevitably lead to poverty and a large class disparity. In a capitalist society, the ones who supply labor, the ones who work the hardest, are the ones who are paid the least. The owners, who are already rich, receive most of the profit and accumulate large masses of wealth.
In the late 2000s, the World suffered from a big global economic crisis which caused “the largest and sharpest drop in global economic activity of the modern era”, in which “most major developed economies find themselves in a deep recession”, according to McKibbin and Stoeckel (1). Because its consequences have a very big impact to the whole world, many economists and scientist have tried to find the causes of the crisis; and some major causes have been emphasized are greed, the defection of the free market system, and the lack of prudent regulation and supervision. This essay will focus on the global imbalances, one of the most important causes of the current economic crisis.