"Maldistribution inheres no more in capital punishment than in any other punishment." (Haag 274) Fear of the death penalty can be a good deterrent. Many people also try to abolish the death penalty by talking about the suffering a convicted murderer has to go through, but what about what the victim had to go through. Further, if we get rid of the death penalty it will show that we are not willing to impose our punishments on people who brake our laws. Some maldistribution of the death penalty is unavoidable, but that does not mean we should throw out the death penalty.
Furthermore, capital punishment remains as the fundamental block to eradicate criminals, however, there are numerous drawbacks to the death penalty that lead to additional damage than solving the problem; therefore, Americans shouldn’t support capital punishment, unless their prepared to perform the undesirable job of killing the prisoners. Nevertheless, there are advocates that support the death penalty, declaring that everybody would benefit, including the victim’s family, which they have
Jailing these people for life just doesn’t seem punishment enough. However, there is a sincere irony found within the death penalty. It brings to mind the parental saying, “Do as I say, not as I do.” The government, in essence, has granted itself rights that the individual has not. Furthermore, these i... ... middle of paper ... ...erson is murdered, it is one of the most heinous thoughts imaginable. But, to advocate execution will only leave us as hypocrites, rather than avengers of justice.
The fact is that the criminal had the choice between right and wrong, and by choosing to do the wrong thing, he or she gave up the right to dictate his or her future. Death penalty cases do cost extra than a life without parole sentence; however, because there are a greater number of life without parole sentences, the costs even out. The deterrence of crime that the death penalty creates is not seen very well in statistics because of some flaws in the research. Although the statistics are not in favor nor against capital punishment, common sense is in favor of the death penalty. Ernest Van Den Haag, a supporter of the death penalty once said, “People fear nothing more than death.” This fear of death has the ability to dissuade criminals.
Whether it'... ... middle of paper ... ...fied individuals. Although the court system is at fault, the ultimate risk is the mistake of killing the wrong person. The expensive price tag for tax payers, barbaric method, and ineffectiveness of the death penalty are reasons why the punishment should be abolished in the United States. To create a society where there is true equality and justice means we must relinquish the barbaric methods we use in our society. Capital punishment is one of those outdated methods for punishing people convicted of a crime.
It not only serves as a state-sanctioned revenge rather then a correctional tool, but also sends a highly contradictory message: Do not kill or we will kill you. In 2011, within the US, states without the death penalty have had consistently lower murder rates, a significant difference of 18% . In addition, the administration of death results in an abundant need for fairness, that consequently opposes ’two wrongs don’t make a right’. Instead, measures used to eradicate human life should go towards aiding families struck with 1st degree tragedies, by c... ... middle of paper ... ...d juries, the limited resources of the defense attorney, and lastly, the heinousness of death penalty cases. Instead of confronting the triple crises of morality, economy and irreversible errors, the death penalty is emplaced as if it were a meaningful solution to crime.
This statement couldn’t be more true; there are many murderers that are serving life sentences or are free because the laws aren’t strict enough. “Imprisonments deterrent effect will never be as great as that of the death penalty” (Burgado). People murder because there is chance that there will be no serious consequence. Spending a lifetime in jail may not be that great of a consequence. The death penalty should definitely deter potential murderers.
There are many reasons as to why I believe the death penalty should be legalized in all states, including deterrence and retribution. In contrast, critics view the death penalty as unconstitutional and irrevocable. The use of capital punishment greatly discourages any wrongdoers from committing any crime such as murder. Many people’s greatest fear is death; therefore if they know that death is a possible consequence for their actions, they are less likely to perform such actions. Ernest van den Haag, a professor and author of “Punishing Criminals:Concerning a Very Old and Painful Question” wrote about the issue of deterrence: “…capital punishment is likely to deter more than other punishments because people fear death more than anything else.
What does it mean for something to be wrong? It means that the majority of human beings can argue that those crimes hurt rather than benefit individuals or a society as a whole. The death penalty can be implemented for any of the crimes listed above when a judge believes that the crime is serious enough. However, the death penalty uses one of the crimes itself; murder. If the government uses the death penalty as a punishment in order to show that murder is wrong, how can they murder and assume it is right?
Closing sentence: The US should have think in a better way if it really need to execute those criminals, or if it can use that money to improve its citizens’ lives and take care of them. Body paragraph 2nd reason (your stance) Topic Sentence: The Death Penalty does not guarantees the public safety. Introduce quote 1: When a state execute a criminal, the possibly of get murder in the streets do not dismiss, states are killing people for nothing. The death of a criminal do not guarantees that safety of the society, so what can the US do for their country? Quote: Cornell law professor Blume illustrates, “We spend a lot of money to execute a very small number of people.