Abolish The Transatlantic Slave Trade

1642 Words4 Pages

The Transatlantic Slave Trade started out as merchant trading of different materials for slaves. With obtaining a controllable form of labor being their main focus, the Europeans began to move to Africa and take over their land. The natives had to work on the newly stolen land to have a source of income to provide for their families.Soon others Europeans began to look for free labor by scouring the continent of Africa. Because Europeans were not familiar with the environment, Africans were employed to kidnap other Africans for the Transatlantic Slave Trade. After trade routes were established, different economies began to link together, and various items were exchanged across the world. As the Atlantic Slave Trade grew larger, problems began …show more content…

The focus was to abolish the slave trade, and William Wilberforce became the spokesperson to persuade them that it was wrong to traffic other human beings. In 1808, he finally convinced the British to stop participating in the slave trade and in his speech he said, “six or seven hundred of these wretches chained two and two, surrounded with every object that is nauseous and disgusting, diseased, and struggling under every kind of misery. How can we bear to think of such a scene as this?” (Blaufarb and Clarke 57). Britain soon convinced the Congress of Vienna to stop the Transatlantic Slave Trade, but France and the United States did not agree to participate because of their involvement in the Revolutionary War against Great Britain. It is astonishing how Great Britain had the overall influence to convince others countries to discontinue their involvement in the Transatlantic Slave Trade. Eventually, France enacted several laws that prevented them from participating in the slave trade; however, they were not subject to the laws that the Congress of Vienna had established. The United States also came up with laws restricting involvement in the slave trade, but it was based on the condition of self-enforcement, which meant that participation in the slave trade was rarely enforced. The United States only created slave laws to show that they had them, and the …show more content…

Davies were put in a row boat and pointed in that direction. Once on land, Mr. Davies went to the Governor William Nicolay to report what had happened to him and his crew (Blaufarb and Clarke 93). Davies explained everything that happened to Governor Nicolay and Governor Nicolay acted at once by getting in contact with the Secretary of War and Colonies, Sir George Murray; the Governor of Guadeloupe; the Admiral, the Baron Des Rotours; and Admiral Fleming, commander of the British Navy. Fleming took Rotours’s absence as evasiveness and was considered to be involved in the Neirsee incident; however, Deare and Davies investigated the taking of the Neirsee. Davies recognized a boat that belonged to Janoel, the pilot that took the Neirsee, but when searching for him, they could not find him inland.They then entered Guadalupe to search for any slaves that were sold, but they were soon sought out by an officer and told to leave. The French felt disrespectful that they were accused by being involved in the slave trade and that the British searched their island without permission; therefore, the French and British went through confrontations about why Captain Owen took the Neirsee and how to prevent further occurrences like the Neirsee incident. The French finally took the matter at and end when they received a letter of Captain Owen’s account of how the ship was never a French ship and it was

Open Document