Losing someone you cared for is devastating. Now, what more if someone loss his or her loved one by someone else's misconduct or wrongdoing? Someone who has experienced this heart-breaking misfortune might say that it is very unfair and perhaps ask the question, why does this have to happen to me? The pain is certainly beyond imagination. No one can truly understand it unless experiencing the same unfortunate tragic circumstance.
Life can't be bought. Not even the richest person in the world will be able to bring a lost loved one back. Imagine losing the bread winner of the house due to a car accident or a surgery gone badly. Suddenly, your life will turn upside down. Not only you're emotionally distraught but physically and mentally as well.
…show more content…
You might feel that life is unjust. Hence, some people seek justice by filing a lawsuit. However, how does one determine if a tragic death of a loved one was done deliberately?
To define a wrongful death clearly, a wrongful death is the death of someone as an outcome of intentional, heedless carelessness or misconduct of another. Typical wrongful deaths are vehicular accidents, medical malpractice, and even defective products such as drugs.
Like what was mentioned earlier, it is true that no money can revive a dead person back to life. In spite of this, if the court has proven that the untimely death of someone is indeed the accountability of the wrongdoer, there are a lot of things to consider in determining the amount of money to compensate and recover the damages for the loss of a loved one. The lawsuit is indeed complicated but there's a certain range or measurement. However, it may differ on many aspects depending on the situation.
The measurement for compensation to a wrongful death may include:
Medical expenses of the person incur during the accident or to the outcome of death. Since, it is possible that at the time of the accident the victim might be hospitalized first before resulting to
Wrongful convictions can occur daily all over the world for several reasons. There are many reasons from false statements, police misconduct, false eye witness identification, investigation wrong doings, evidence mishandle and many more issues that force innocent people to be convicted of crimes they never committed. We need to be able to have law officers, eye witness’s whoever is making false statements or identifications or just over looking evidence those individuals need to be punished. Wrongful
Wrongful convictions occur when innocent defendants are found guilty in criminal trials, or when defendants feel compelled to plead guilty to crimes they did not commit in order to avoid the death penalty or extremely long prison sentences. The term wrongful conviction can also refer to cases in which a jury erroneously finds a person with a good defense guilty (e.g., self-defense), or where an appellate court reverses a conviction (regardless of the defendant’s factual guilt) obtained in violation
tort can be defined as a wrong that interferes with a person’s legally protected interests , whereas, a delict can be defined as a wrongful act causing damage to someone’s personality, family or property. There are many similarities between the Roman law of Delicts and the common law of Torts, including the similarity between the tort of liability for animals and the Actio de Pauperie and the Edict of the Aediles, the tort of trespass to land and the tort of wrongful death which is similar to the
The Death Penalty: Killing to Show Killing is Wrong Everyone knows that killing is wrong. So why should the government be able to kill people in order to show the population that killing is wrong? The answer is: they shouldn’t. Capital punishment is hypocritical and should no longer be given out as a sentence. The death penalty is immoral and should be abolished due to its high costs, its ability to give the criminals an “easy way out,” it leaves too much room for error, and most importantly
Criminal and Civil court systems A number of differences exist between the criminal and civil court systems. In the criminal court system, the victim reports the crime to law enforcement who may investigate. If adequate evidence is found during investigation and an arrest is made, a prosecutor files charges against the defendant. The criminal court system considers the crime to be committed against the state rather than against the individual victim. In a criminal case, the prosecutor acts as
enforcements is still a burden to the minorities in America. Moreover, wrongful conviction is a horrible injustice when a person spends years in jail. This is getting recognized by the U.S. system but often late. In many cases by the time a person is proven innocent, he or she might
Euthanasia is Inherently Wrong My impression is that the idea of euthanasia, if not the practice, is gradually gaining acceptance within our society. People like Jack Kevorkian attribute this to an increasing inclination to devalue human life, but I do not believe that this is the major factor. The acceptance of euthanasia is much more likely to be the result of unthinking sympathy and benevolence. It is an easy step from this very human response to the view that if
Death Penalty Annually the U.S government wastes an additional 261 million dollars having criminals on death row. It is said that the death penalty deters crime and helps to prevent further heinous crimes such as murder. I can see this because you would assume people would think about the repercussions before they commit a crime. However this is completely wrong and has no statical evidence to back it up rather statistics to oppose it. The death penalty needs to be abolished because of the cost
Wrongful Convictions Introduction There is no true way to know the amount of individuals who have been wrongfully convicted (Neubauer, 2011). Contrary to popular belief, justice and law are not coexisting (Gershman, 1993, pp. 502-515). Most individuals feel and believe that the Criminal Justice System would have steps in place to catch and rectify this issue (Neubauer, 2011). The advent of DNA testing not only generated more attention for, and research about wrongful convictions (Gould, 2010, pp
January,2015 Annotated Bibliography The main topic of this research paper will be policing and wrongful convictions. How is someone wrongfully convicted? What impact does this have on their life? On the community? And how are Police departments working on putting wrongful convictions to an end? There are several reasons as to why a person can be wrongfully convicted which are are eyewitness misidentifications, junk science, false
not commit, once said upon his release. Although Madrigal did not express public hatred or anger after being released from prison, the time taken from his life still haunts him nine years later. Madrigal’s case further justifies the argument that wrongful conviction can happen to anyone, and affect anyone’s life. With the belief that our law system is so perfect and structured, it is sometimes hard to believe cases such as Madrigal’s. By irrational standards, we have been taught that our law system
characters' attitudes, and emotions are all directly related to the surrounding environment of racial tension. A Japanese-American Kabuo Miyamoto, who was born in the United States, is facing the charge of first-degree murder. He is on trial for the death of Carl Heine, a fellow fisherman and his old childhood friend (Guterson). The racial hatred between the Japanese and the Americans fuels many of the conflicts including the prejudice and urged conviction of Kabuo. Almost all the jurors adamantly insist
Both Sam and Ronny had knowledge of all the wrong doings that they were doing. From the drag racing, to the speeding, to running the red light, to hitting Sam and Running over Sam and not stopping. Not only will they be charged with Intentional Tort of battery, but they will be charged with a hit
article, “ ‘Give Me Children or I Shall Die!’ New Reproductive Technologies and Harm to Children,” discusses evidences that indicate how reproductive technologies cause illnesses and defects to small percentage of children. Cohen argues that it would be wrong to use reproductive technologies if it cause harm to children. There are proponents of this argument who put forth the “Interest in Existing Argument”, which argues that even though reproductive technologies cause harm to children, it is, however,
...th a great deal of malice directed toward the victim. And to convict in the criminal court, the case against the defendant must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. In a civil case for wrongful death, on the other hand, you have to show only that the defendant was legally responsible for the death. But, to get punitive damages, as the plaintiffs did in the O.J. case, you have to show that the defendant acted recklessly. The burden of proof in a civil case is preponderance of the evidence