'A Thematic Analysis Of Russo's Short Story Dog'

519 Words2 Pages

In the short story “Dog,” Russo paints the picture of a strong willed boy who is amongst parents who don’t understand what the real problem which is his lack of parents attention and bad parenting when dealing with his extreme obsessions over getting a dog. First off, William had a deep obsession to have a dog. It wasn’t only just a child wanting a pet but a supplier for what his parents lacked. As a side note I also thought that the obsession was also a way to defy his parents. But besides that, for a lot of people, a dog is a figure of friendship. Dogs don’t have to even have to decide whether they like you or not, you just have to love them and feed them. They wouldn’t judge or care about your intelligence, your looks, or how much money you make doing whatever kind of job. A dog most of the time is a truly loyal creature you can trust to love. He lacked all that because his parents treated him like an accessory (which means he was nothing more than a responsibility and something that they had because “you’re supposed to have children”) and William even admitted that his childhood self was lonely: “In all situations I was the only child, and I must have been a lonely one, because what I wanted …show more content…

They thought he was going to be just like them instead of him having his own individual interests. For example when they finally got a dog, they forgot to get the name of the dog so had think of a new one and the mother wanted to name the dog a scholarly name, ““You could name him after a passé school of literary criticism,”(pg 161) my mother suggested.”, even though he never really cared for their educated and uppity ways. Also that William corrected his mother that the dog was a she when she said “him” in the quote above. After that, the father brushed that off and kept calling it a “he” like on pages 161 “What’ll we name him?”, and 162 ““Dead,” he said. “Before we could even name him.”” which irritated

Open Document