A Rhetorical Analysis Of 'Maxfield' By Paul Campos Maxfield

920 Words2 Pages

Divine Pungi
Sydney Brown
English 120s
April 26 2018
4.5 Rhetorical Analysis Assignment
There are various things to do in order to lose weight, such as starting a diet, being healthy as well as eating healthy. We continue to believe what is the right way of being healthy in the way we view food in which involve eating less and more different. There are a few things to understand to fulfill our basic needs such as being able to make a difference between the good and bad cravings our body has. As well as knowing what nutrition facts are showing and most importantly how to read and understand nutrition facts and how to live a healthy lifestyle. “When we attempt to rise above our animal nature through the moralization of food, we unnecessarily complicate the process of eating,”(Maxfield, pg. 446) as Maxfield states to prove that food isn’t moral or immoral. Maxfield’s major claim is that our understanding of health is mainly based on culture as it is in fact, eventually begins to refer articles in order to support her beliefs. As she quotes Paul …show more content…

for example she uses a fat acceptance activist to support her arguments, "the problem is our understanding of health is as based in culture as it is in fact." she uses the opinions of a law professor and journalist, Paul Campos, and fat-acceptance activist, Kate Harding, to support her point of view. Although people who do have the credentials to speak about the validity of BMI of health are usually medical professionals, nutritionists, health research scientists, people with degrees in medicine and health, in which isn’t something they both have. Maxfield extends Campos’ and Harding’s beliefs on health, in fact, that she fully trusts their argument and uses it as evidence for her own claims despite their respective ability of not being in health or

Open Document