A Rhetorical Analysis Of Atticus's Closing Argument

621 Words2 Pages

Rhetorical Analysis of Atticus’s Closing Argument In Harper Lee’s To Kill a Mockingbird, Atticus Finch employs pathos and figurative language in his closing argument to the jury and people of Maycomb in order to persuade them to see beyond their prejudice and free Tom Robinson. As Atticus is just beginning his speech, he shifts focus off of Tom Robinson. Logos is used in Atticus’s appeal when he says, “‘The defendant is not guilty, but somebody in this courtroom is’” (Lee 271). Atticus is taking the blame off Tom Robinson, and placing it on Mayella Ewell. Logically, there is no way that Tom did this crime, but Mayella refuses to change her story, and is willing to let Tom be killed to protect her reputation. This allows the jury to look back on the details and make a clear decision. …show more content…

An appeal to logos is illustrated when Atticus says, “‘There is not a person in this courtroom who has never told a lie, who has never done an immoral thing, and there is no man living who has never looked upon a woman without desire’” (Lee 273), because there is not a person in the world who has never done something wrong in their life, because everyone makes mistakes. Using this logic, the jury and people of Maycomb are placed lower, giving Tom a more equal advantage in this case. As Atticus is wrapping up his speech, he addresses the courtroom about court. “‘A court is only as sound as its jury, and a jury is only as sound as the men that make it up’” (Lee 274), is an appeal to logos because a court is only fair if the people of the jury are fair. Singling out the jury puts more pressure on them to make the transparent decision that Tom Robinson is not

Open Document