12 Angry Men Rhetorical Analysis

Reginald’s Roses purpose in writing Twelve Angry Men is to point out that justice can be oblivious unless someone or something acts upon it because in some cases, we are over powered by our biases or by individuality and/or conformity that we don’t focus on the facts, or we don’t even bother caring about sending someone to the death penalty because all we want is to rest. For instance, Juror #3 bias of his son made him think of his kid, ignoring the fact that the trial was about another individual, not his son. He believes that all the teenagers are the same, when in reality, they are not.“…When he was sixteen we had a battle. He hit me in the face. He’s big y’know. I haven’t seen him in two years. Rotten Kid.” (Rose 18). Additionally,