Essay PreviewMore ↓
What does the doctrine of precedent mean and do you agree with the comments made by Justice Lionel Murphy?
The doctrine of precedent or ‘stare descisi’ is a principle or operation of law which allows the establishment of case law or common law, whereby the decision of a previous case establishes a precedent on which similar future cases can be decided. The doctrine of precedent says that once a decision is made in a case the ‘ratio decidendi’, or the reason for the decision, becomes a precedent. Unlike statues created by parliament, these case decisions form common law. These precedents and the common law help maintain consistency in rulings of cases. The doctrine of precedent relies on a hierarchy of the courts. This hierarchy means that precedents of superior courts are binding on lower courts, however precedents from lower courts are not binding on higher courts, although they still may be persuasive. Ultimately the doctrine of precedent establishes decisions as precedents to be followed in future cases to maintain a consistent application of law, yet also allowing the establishment of new precedents.
When Justice Murphy said that the doctrine of precedent is “eminently suitable for a nation overwhelmingly populated by sheep” he sought to highlights some of the issues with the doctrine of precedent, including its ability to provide and embrace change. Justice Murphy argues that judges are often to blindly follow the precedent of old cases without considering the changes and evolution that society has undergone since a precedent was established. Some aspects of Justice Murphy’s criticism of the doctrine are valid, in particular the questions he raises about the judicial system too blindly adhering to precedents. While on one hand the doctrine plays a valuable role to ensuring consistency, certainty and fairness, if a bad precedent is established or the precedent is no longer in line with changes in society it can be detrimental if followed too strictly.
In conclusion, the doctrine of precedent is valuable for society but shouldn’t always be followed blindly, as, “somewhere between the world of slavish obedience to past precedent and antagonism towards its rules, lies the real world of Australian law as it is practised in the courts” (M Kirby, 2006).
How to Cite this Page
"The Doctrine of Precedent and The Elements of a Contract." 123HelpMe.com. 26 Apr 2019
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- This essay will examine the subject of consideration in contract law. In doing so it will examine how and why the doctrine of consideration was initially used and how it has developed over time; by analysing how economic duress has come into play and developed over time to fill in the gap on whether consideration in a contract is sufficient or where one of the parties is threatening to terminate a contract unless the other party agrees to their first party’s demands and where the second party has no apparent choice but to do so.... [tags: Contract, Common law, Contract law]
1739 words (5 pages)
- Based on common law and precedent, the English law of contract has been formulated and developed over a number of years with it’s primary purpose to provide a regulated framework within which individuals can contract freely. In order to ensure a contract is enforceable there are certain elements which must be satisfied, one of which is the doctrine of consideration. Lord Denning famously professed; “the doctrine of consideration is too firmly fixed to be overthrown by a side wind” . This is a crucial indication that consideration has long been regarded as the cardinal ‘badge of enforceability’ in the formulation and variation of contracts in English common law.... [tags: English Law of Contract]
2235 words (6.4 pages)
- Legal Issues A legal discussion of the contractual breaches and their related legal elements will be examined in this section. Some of the legal issues surrounding the contractual breaches include, the legal implications of the Uniform Commercial Code (U.C.C.), the defendant’s engagement in and outputs contract while under a requirements contract with my company, the doctrine of estoppel, and the issues of good faith and fair dealing. The definitions and some of the legal implications of the implied and requirements contracts were discussed in the preceding sections.... [tags: Contract law, Contract, Breach of contract]
904 words (2.6 pages)
- The difference between a mediocre attorney and a great attorney, is their ability to do great research. Researching anything is a process; thus, legal research is the process of finding which primary law applies to a client’s problem. There are certain guidelines an attorney must follow when researching in the field of law; their goal to win their case in court with only the research they found. There are also different sources of law that require different approaches to research. There are primary and secondary sources of law.... [tags: Common law, Case law, Law, Precedent]
1285 words (3.7 pages)
- It seems to be a conventional wisdom that breaking rules that has been established and recognized is disgraceful and hateful and people who broke the rules are believed to be lack of reliability and responsibility, but is this always true and are they definitely wrong for doing so. In reality, sometimes breaking rules is a defence rather than an offence resulting from dishonorable desire, in which case breaking rules should no longer be blamed or despised, instead, rule breakers are eligible for the justice and equity that they deserve.... [tags: Contract, Contract law, Common law]
1201 words (3.4 pages)
- Introduction This submission will discuss the problems created by the Doctrine of Judicial Precedent and will attempt to find solutions to them. Whereas, English Law has formed over some 900 years it was not until the middle of the 19th Century that the modern Doctrine was ‘reaffirmed’. London Tramways Co. Ltd V London County Council (1898). Law is open to interpretation, all decisions made since the birth of the English Legal System, have had some form of impact whether it is beneficial or not The term ‘Judicial Precedent’ has at least two meanings, one of which is the process where Judges will follow the decisions of previously decided cases, the other is wh... [tags: Judicial Precedent]
1530 words (4.4 pages)
- One of the elements of a contract is contractual capacity. This means that for a contract to be legally binding the parties must have the capacity to comprehend and appreciate the terms of the contract. Minors, individuals who are mentally challenged, and those who are under the influence of intoxicating substances are not legally capable of forming binding contracts. The requirement of capacity helps prevent vulnerable members of society from being required by an agreement to take on risky obligations or unfair responsibilities that they probably are not able to fully understand.... [tags: Contract, Contract law, Statute of frauds]
1127 words (3.2 pages)
- Introduction The paper is going to explain the five elements of a contract, why this contract is governed by common law, and also two circumstances in which this non-complete agreement would be unenforceable. Laws that govern a contract When it comes to a contract laws they will be governed by the common law or the Uniform Commercial Code. With that said when a person receives a contract they must know what type of law it will fall under. If the contract has to do with the sale of goods, then it would be placed under the Uniform Commercial Code, and if the contract has to do with anything other than the sale of the goods then it would go under the common law (Seaquist, 2012).... [tags: Contract, Law, Contract law, Common law]
1097 words (3.1 pages)
- An elements of a legal contract is legally enforceable agreement. Also All contracts, whether written, verbal, express or implied must have certain elements in order to be valid. People make promises and don’t tend to keep them half the time. For a contract to be forcible several key factors have to be established. Which would be offer , Acceptance, Consideration, Legality,Capacity,Consent,and Writing. Element one The party must show false statement of facts,element two the party must demonstrate that the statement was material or important.... [tags: Contract, Contract law, Void]
1090 words (3.1 pages)
- A contract is a documented treaty between two or more parties and is enforced by the law. The involved parties must concur with the stated terms. In everyday life, we come across many contracts. For example, a student signs a contract when they borrow a book from a library. Also, the library has to stamp a document a sign of sealing the deal. Contacts are most common in the business world more than any other part of the society. Business entails several dealings and sometimes may involve huge sums of cash.... [tags: Contract, Law, Contract law, LAW]
903 words (2.6 pages)