Descartes has doubt that we can see the difference between being awake and asleep, this comes from a deeper and exaggerated amount of doubt. He makes claims that there is nothing that can prove that we are either awake or asleep. He says that he often does similar things when he is awake and asleep. Hobbes has a different view, he feels like when he is asleep he doesn 't think of the same things nor does he have coherent thoughts. He also doesn 't think that he is asleep while awake or vise versa. Descartes argument holds little backing when he continues to claim his argument, though Hobbes has created a clear and arguable argument claiming his belief in when he is awake he is awake and when he is dreaming he is clearly dreaming. Neither Hobbes nor Descartes actually go into concrete reasons to why they are right. I will then try to argue my own reasoning on why I side with Hobbes. By creating thing that can give us reason to believe that we can actually know when we are sleeping or awake.
In Descartes first meditation we see that he begins to examine a series of doubts he has, one being the ability to see the difference between being awake and dreaming. He begins by saying that he often has dreams that are fabricated the same as when he is awake, “How often has it happened to me that in the night I dreamt that I found myself in this particular place, that I was dressed and seated near the fire, whilst in reality I was lying undressed in bed!” (Meditation 1-7). He believes he is often doing the very same things that he is doing while he is “awake” in his dreams, common everyday things. He throws out there that he might be being deceived by false illusions. As he furthers his thoughts, he makes the claim that there are indicato...
... middle of paper ...
...s can’t get back to what you are dreaming about no matter how hard you try. Another is when you are “awake” what you do directly affects other people, not only yourself. But in your dreams, you are mostly self centered and only directly affecting your own life.
Now all these things could be knocked down by Descartes belief in an external world or an evil demon deceiving us but regardless being “awake” is more of an existence, than our dream world. If our false reality is all an illusion, than it is the closest thing we would have to being awake. With the being said, Descartes can discredit Hobbes opinion because he feels like there isn 't any concrete proof but Descartes has very little evidence to prove that his theory is legitimate. I think that Hobbes has more of a backing on his thoughts on the differences between awake and asleep than Descartes can discredit.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- “I know for certain that I am standing up; it is absolutely certain that I am; there is not the smallest chance that I am not.”-G.E Moore. Rene Descartes, introduced the Dream Argument, where he believed that we cannot trust our senses because at some point in an individual’s life they might be dreaming and believe that what was occurring during that dream was reality. This argument, was opposed to by G.E Moore where used evidence and knowledge to flip over the dream argument. He finds that Descartes, argument was very inconsistent.... [tags: Mind, Epistemology, Metaphysics, René Descartes]
992 words (2.8 pages)
- This paper will be discussing René Descartes’ argument on substance dualism, and more specifically the argument of separation of the mind and the body. Descartes proposes the argument of substance dualism in defense of the view that there are two types of substances: the mental substance and the physical substance. Therefore, substance dualism also states that the mind is a mental substance which is separate from the body, despite both having a connection to each other. This view is in contrast to the more popular physicalist view, which states that all entities in the world are solely physical.... [tags: Philosophy of mind, Mind, Consciousness, Argument]
785 words (2.2 pages)
- Descartes has doubt that we can see the difference between being awake and asleep, this comes from a deeper and exaggerated amount of doubt. He makes claims that there is nothing that can prove that we are either awake or asleep. He says that he often does similar things when he is awake and asleep. Hobbes has a different view, he feels like when he is asleep he doesn 't think of the same things nor does he have coherent thoughts. He also doesn 't think that he is asleep while awake or vise versa.... [tags: Mind, Thought, Critical thinking, Psychology]
1215 words (3.5 pages)
- Descartes’ Argument for the Existence of God In Descartes’ second meditation, he offers up an argument for Defective Nature Doubt that brings forth the idea that we can’t be certain of anything we perceive being actual and real (153). Descartes thinks that there is a possibility that we are constantly being deceived due to the fact that we don’t know, with perfect certainty, know where our ideas originate from (154). He tries to describe a method in order to dispel this Defective Nature Doubt by giving an argument for the existence of God.... [tags: Mind, Thought, Human, Existence]
1088 words (3.1 pages)
- Descartes employs what is known as an ontological argument to prove the existence of God. Saint Anselm who lived during the 11th century first formulated this type of argument. Since then it has proved popular with many philosophers including Rene` Descartes. Even though ontological arguments have lost popularity with modern philosophers there has been some recent attempts to revive them. Descartes formulation is regarded as being one of the best because it is straight forward and relatively easy to follow.... [tags: philosophy, theology]
1171 words (3.3 pages)
- The purpose of the wax argument is designed to provide a clear and distinct knowledge of “I”, which is the mind, while corporeal things, “whose images are framed by thought, and which the senses themselves imagine are much more distinctly known than this mysterious ‘I’ which does not fall within the imagination” (66). Through the wax argument, Descartes’ demonstrates that corporeal things are perceived neither through our senses nor imagination, but through our intellect alone. In this argument, you will see that there is cause to doubt Descartes’ analysis of the wax and his method of philosophical reasoning.... [tags: Descartes Meditations]
1444 words (4.1 pages)
- I will attempt to clearly explain an argument found in a paragraph in Rules for the Discovery of Scientific Truth, by René Descartes. In order to accomplish this task, I will discern and explain Descartes’ argument, offer what I consider to be the most significant objection to the argument, and contemplate how Descartes would reply to that objection. In his college days, Descartes “discovered that nothing can be imagined which is too strange or incredible to have been said by some philosopher” (195).... [tags: Truth, Logic, Epistemology, Reason]
853 words (2.4 pages)
- You stop to observe the goings on of your day, things that are mundane and nothing out of the ordinary. How can you prove that what you are seeing is not all but a dream. According to Descartes’ Dream Argument, it is impossible to tell with Cartesian, or absolute, certainty that any given experience is not a dream. While we may believe what we perceive to be true, it is not always wise to trust our senses, as they have tendencies to fail us. Because perception begins at the senses, if we cannot trust them to be accurate one hundred percent of the time, there is no way to tell if any given moment is dreamed or reality.... [tags: Epistemology, Mind, Dream, Truth]
1001 words (2.9 pages)
- Descartes’ argues that the mind and body are two separate entities. The body occupies space, and so it is always divisible, while the mind is made up of thoughts that are immaterial and cannot be divided, thus it is indivisible. Using the idea behind Leibniz’s Law, “different properties, different things”, Descartes’ begins to construct his argument for the reasons he believes that the mind and body are completely different things. I will go over the reason he thinks the body can be divided, while the mind cannot.... [tags: mind, body, space, motion]
915 words (2.6 pages)
- Descartes’ Argument from Divisibility Works Cited Missing Reneì Descartes’ treatise on dualism, his Meditations on First Philosophy, is a seminal work in Western intellectual history, outlining his theory of the mind and its relation to the rest of the world. The main argument running through the Meditations leads from his universal methodic doubt through his famous cogito, to proofs of dualism, God, and the world. The Cartesian dualism is one of the most influential ideas to come out of the work; the style of the Meditations, however, is one of personal rumination, following what appears to be Descartes’ stream of consciousness , and it allows for mild tangential discussions.... [tags: Philosophy Philosophical Papers]
1693 words (4.8 pages)