Syrian Chemical Weapons Controversy

993 Words2 Pages

Ever since the devastating results of the use of chemical weapons in World War One, the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) has set up a convention to prohibit chemical weapons. 100 out of the 106 countries on our planet have signed this convention. One of the six countries that has yet to sign this convention is Syria. Syria has been the recent target of chemical weapon controversy, after a sarin gas attack in Damascus on its own citizens on the morning of August 21st, 2013. “1,429 innocent citizens including 426 children” were killed in this attack (BBC News). Syria’s stockpiling and transportation of chemical weapons has forced the hand of the United States executive branch. This forced foreign policy of the US is the “red line” that US can not back down from. The United States foreign policy with Syria is effective because Syria is following through with the destruction of its chemical weapons on the …show more content…

Obama stated in his UN speech “the United States of America is prepared to use all elements of our power, including military force” (Cassidy). One reason this policy was implemented is because of the historically proven dangers and cruelty of the use of chemical weapons—“chemical weapons are inhumane and a horrific way to die—and that's why the most of the world has outlawed them” (Kordunsky). Bashar Al-Assad, Syria’s president, used his chemical weapons on his own people. He crossed a red line and culturally damaged his country. Syria is an example of political corruption as well. “President Obama for the first time Thursday called on Syrian President Bashar Assad to step down, while announcing a new set of sanctions against the regime” (Obama Calls on Assad). Syria’s people want change, and Assad is getting in the way and trying to sustain his power with force and torture through these treacherous

Open Document