Brief History of Charlemagne or Charles the Great

1678 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Two lives of charlemagne differences

Born into royalty, Charlemagne always knew what it was like to live the luxurious life. His parents who were devoted to God and religion immediately introduced him to Christianity. His father being King of the Franks granted him the title as soon as he came of age. Once Carloman, Charlemagne’s brother, died and failed to fulfill his duties as king, Charlemagne took over his place. This decision making him not only leader of one kingdom, but two. Throughout his lifetime he inspired others, and had converted many citizens to become Christians. Even though he had his fair share of victorious battles, one in crucial expedition caused pandemonium throughout the kingdom. Charlemagne is not an epic hero, because he was not successful with the call he received, and failed millions of people including himself.
Being brought to this world, Charlemagne’s parents, Betrada of Laon and Pepin the Short, already had a fond love of religion. They had always been true devoted Christians, and seeked God for guidance. Having their first born son, they knew it was essential to introduce their son to religion. Therefore at an early age Charlemagne learned about the importance of believing in something strongly. Charlemagne being the oldest out of three sons gave him a sense of leadership and value. Having being the oldest gives him more responsibility and awareness, these being traits that will be needed in the future. According to Manuel Komroff, “King Pepin had given his sons the best education placing them in the Palace school, where many educated instructors were there who had come from special training” (Komroff 14). Komroff maintains, “In result Charlemagne could say and express whatever he wanted in the most fluent way, while he a...

... middle of paper ...

...hat use to bring joy to his heart. He begins to focus more of time with his children and do the same hobbies he grew to love with his friends. Activities such as fishing and hunting with close friends and family members occurred during his days. He became more intact with his religion and focused on converting more people into Christianity and making sure before eh passes the one thing he is truly devoted to lives on. Now that his sons all have the title to the throne he makes sure that he trains them more and more each day so they could all three become great leaders and rulers. Charlemagne’s decisions and actions may not have always been wise but were just enough to satisfy many citizens that lived among his kingdom. One thing nobody will forget about him is he not only makes decisions for his own benefits, but he makes sure that others are benefited as well.

Show More
Related

  • Differences Between Charlemagne And The Carolingian Empire

    600 Words  | 2 Pages

    Before Charlemagne and the Carolingian empire, there was in no proper sense a “Western Europe”. For the romans, everything geographically was centered around Mare Nostrum, the medditerrian.* The lands surrounding the Mediterranean sea, Hispania, Italy, Greece, and north Africa were all seen as being closer to together geographically and culturally, then the lands of Gaul or Germania. Even after the fall of the Western Roman Empire, Europe was seen as everything away from the northern coast of the Mediterranean, usually only Gaul and Rhineland.*

    Read More

  • The Life of Charlemagne by Einhard

    1381 Words  | 3 Pages

    Charlemagne is described by Janet Nelson as being a role model for Einhard. Einhard himself writes in the first paragraph of The Life of Charlemagne, “After I decided to write about the life, character and no small part of the accomplishments of my lord and foster father, Charles, that most excellent and deservedly famous king, I determined to do so with as much brevity as I could.” I feel that these are sincere words about the man who cared for Einhard. I feel that Einhard’s purpose for writing The Life of Charlemagne is to praise the works of his “foster-father” and create a historical document that would describe the great deeds of Charlemagne so that he would not be forgotten throughout time as a great leader and man.

    Read More

  • Charlemagne’s Will: Church, Empire, and Intellect

    887 Words  | 2 Pages

    Charlemagne—Charles, King of the Franks—obviously has a fan in Einhard. His powerful work, The Life of Charlemagne, details the king’s life from the building of his empire, through the education of his children, and culminating in his final living words: the division of his possessions and the instructions for the preservation of his kingdom. At first glance, the inclusion of Charlemagne’s will seems an odd choice to end an essay that demonstrates thoroughly the specifics of the great man’s life. After all, who needs to know which child gets his gold, and which archbishop he favored the most. Einhard reveals the ignorance in this assumption by doing just the opposite: using Charlemagne’s will as the final and most convincing illustration of the king’s life and character.

    Read More

  • The Countless Lives of Charlemagne

    1119 Words  | 3 Pages

    The most famous work about Charlemagne is a book entitled The Two Lives of Charlemagne which consists of two separate biographies published into one book and tells the story of Charlemagne's life as two different people experienced it. Apart from this, there are many other places you can turn to learn more about the life of the king of the Franks, including letters, capitularies, inventories, annals, and more. However, each of these sources seem to paint a different picture of Charlemagne. In one, he seems to be a very average guy; in another, a mythical being, almost god-like; and a strong and firm political leader in yet another. It is because of this of this that we will never really know exactly who Charlemagne was or what he was like, but we do have an idea of what he did and how he lived thanks to those who decided to preserve it.

    Read More

  • Charlemagne

    941 Words  | 2 Pages

    After reading two versions of “The Life of Charlemagne”, one written by a person who lived with Charlemagne, and one who didn’t, it is evident that Charlemagne is portrayed in a negative way by the author, the Monk of St. Gall, and in a positive way by Einhard. Einhard was very close to Charlemagne. He lived at the same time and with Charlemagne himself. His version of “The Life of Charlemagne” was writing right after his death. The Monk of St. Gall wrote his version more than 70 years after Charlemagne’s death. He did not live with or even at the same time as Charlemagne. This is probably one of the reasons the view on the ruler are completely different.

    Read More

  • The Two Lives of Charlemagne

    696 Words  | 2 Pages

    The two lives of Charlemagne as told by Einhard and Notker are two medieval sources about the accounts of the life Charlemagne. Modern sources by Matthew Innes and Rosamond Mckitterick discuss how history was recorded during the medieval period and how it was suppose to be viewed in the early ages. Observing each of these sources helps get an understanding of how the writing of history is important in recorded history and how it affected how the history of Charlemagne was recorded.

    Read More

  • Charlemagne: A Necessary Evil

    1098 Words  | 3 Pages

    All throughout history, people have been fighting, there have been wars and conflicts ever since man has become ‘civilized’ enough to raise an army. And, many, many if not almost all of these conflicts have involved religion in some way or another (Ben-Meir). The question is why, and how, do people use God as justification for fighting and killing one another. Isn’t killing supposed to be wrong in God’s eyes? Whatever happened to ‘Thou shalt not Kill’? And how is it that hundreds of thousands of people have died by the hands of those who call themselves Christians?

    Read More

  • The Impact Of Charlemagne's Impact On Europe

    1482 Words  | 3 Pages

    Charlemagne once said, “Right action is better than knowledge, but in order to do what is right, we must know what is right” (historymedren.com). Charlemagne proved himself to be a successful leader, and he was an inspiration to others who desired to rule Europe. He was born in 742, and very little information is known about his adolescence. Europe was trapped in its fourth century of the “dark ages” when Charlemagne was born but this quickly changed after Charlemagne became the ruler of Europe and exhibited his strong leadership skills. (livescience.com).He put a large emphasis on education and revealed that he was an inquisitive individual as he studied and spoke in many different languages. Charlemagne’s desire for success, his emphasis of culture, and his quest for knowledge ended Europe’s unproductiveness and led to great prosperity.

    Read More

  • Charlemagne

    2859 Words  | 6 Pages

    “The apprenticeship of a King” describes how Charlemagne gained power through conquest and diplomacy. In 768, King Pippin died and his kingdom was divided between his two sons. Charles, the elder, and the younger was Carloman. The author says that little is known of Charles’ boyhood. When he was of the right age, it is recorded that he worked eagerly at riding and hunting. It was the custom of the Franks to ride and be practiced in the use of arms and ways of hunting. We may reasonably infer that acquiring these skills formed a major part of his early education. Charles was not a “man of letters” and the author makes no attempt at explaining this other than to point out that literacy was considered unimportant at that time for anyone other than the clergy and Charles didn’t become interested in “letters” until later in life. Bullough explains a number of experiences in public duties and responsibilities, which were assigned to Charles by his father, thus, giving him an apprenticeship to rule the kingdom. For some reason tension between Charles and his brother began shortly after their accession. The author explains a number of conflicts. The younger brother died however, at the end of 771 and a number of prominent people in his kingdom offered allegiance to Charles. Bullough names and explains those subjects. The result was the re-uniting of those territories, which helped to establish the kingdom of the Franks.

    Read More

  • Gregory of Tours’ Clovis' Conversion to Orthodox Christianity

    2541 Words  | 6 Pages

    In The History of the Franks, Gregory of Tours portrayed Clovis as a leader who, although his conversion to Christianity appeared to be genuine, nonetheless, used his conversion to realize his political aspirations. By converting to Christianity, Clovis, according to Gregory of Tours’ narrative, was able to garner the support of Christian leaders such as Saint Remigius and, consequently, gain powerful political allies. Moreover, as a result of his conversion, Clovis became a king who was more attractive to orthodox Christians. Furthermore, Clovis’ conversion provided him with a reason for conquering territories that were not ruled by orthodox Christians. Thus, Clovis was able to bring additional territories under his command without resistance from local orthodox Christian leaders and with a degree of approval from the orthodox Christian masses as he, in essence, took on the Christ-like role of savior and liberator who relieved the orthodox Christian masses of flawed leadership from “false” Christians, pagans, or the morally inept. Interestingly, it seems that Clovis’ alleged behavior was not entirely unique as parallels and discrepancies exist between Gregory of Tour’s account of Clovis’ conversion to orthodox Christianity, his depiction of Gundobad’s conversion, and Eusebius’ description of Constantine’s conversion.

    Read More

  • A Comparison Of Two Lives Of Charlemagne

    808 Words  | 2 Pages

    The collection Two Lives of Charlemagne contains two different biographies of Charlemagne who was a king of the Franks and a christian emperor of the West in the 8th century. The first biographical account was written by his courtier Einhard who knew him personally and well. On the other hand, the second account was penned by Notker the Stammerer was born twenty-five years after the king’s death. Even though these two versions indicate the same king’s life, there were many differences between the two. Einhard’s writing focused on the emperor’s official life and his military campaign. However, Notker provided more of a perspective about the king’s legacy and seemed more hyperbolic as well as mythical. This paper will compare and contrast the

    Read More

  • Beowulf The Epic Hero

    1321 Words  | 3 Pages

    On the plus side for Beowulf we can say that he was a pious warrior. Although he was from being a modest warrior, for he was anything but modest when it came to his great deeds of valor on the battlefield, he did credit Jesus for every success he has come across. This is not really a revolutionary idea for epic heroes, as we see the heroes of the

    Read More

  • Life Of Charlemagne Summary

    1208 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...   The church too performed many personal functions for Charlemagne of a less-than-political nature, including his last rites, the care of his sister in her convent, and his own burial. The church also acted as a kind of legal authority, witnessing his inheritance arrangements.

    Read More

  • How Hamlet's Mental State Changes in the Soliloquies in Hamlet by Shakespeare

    759 Words  | 2 Pages

    noble birth and he had a lot of responsibility in his kingdom. He is looked up to by most for leadership and guidance.

    Read More

  • Middle Ages Culture Essay

    1493 Words  | 3 Pages

    Religion is among one of the aspects that defines culture. This was a key concept for those living in the Middle Ages, whose lives were dominated by religion. More specifically, those in high positions of the church dominated their lives because the church provided a unified culture, or belief system. In fact, in the Early Middle Ages, rulers needed the support of the church to legitimize their rule. This was the case for Charlemagne, who united much of Western Europe and converted his subjects to Christianity. Pope Leo III crowned Charlemagne emperor of the Romans in 800(History). “The assumption of the title of emperor of Charlemagne in

    Read More

More about Brief History of Charlemagne or Charles the Great

Open Document