Hegemony Theory In Sports

729 Words2 Pages

Time and time again professional and collegiate athletes are caught cheating across the board in all types of sports. The main motive for athletes to dope and think they’ll get away with it is money. If one wins more competitions, one will in turn get more sponsorships or get paid more. For collegiate athletes they are the ones striving to make money, and they think that in order to do that they have no other choice than to dope. Athletes seem to get caught up in the idea of competition, specifically winning, and they lose track of the real reason they compete. They realize that if they continue to win, they will also continue to make more money, and that becomes the driving force behind it all. It is easy for sport franchises, television stations, …show more content…

Without winning, they will not make any money. That’s when they tend to take matters into their own hands. The hegemony theory supports this idea of money driven sports and athletes. In Sociology of the American sport, Eitzen and Sage describe the hegemony theory as sports being a means by which we teach values and cultural ideas of what is right and wrong (Eitzen & Sage, 2016). The major franchises such as NFL and MLB pay their players and coaches thousands, often millions, of dollars to play and coach. In result, the players and coaches are going to live very comfortable lives and be fairly wealthy. This is teaching the athletes that aspire to be like the professionals and the main benefits of being a professional athlete is the money. So, as a result, some athletes realize that the only way they will get to that status is if they …show more content…

According to an article out of Eastern Michigan University, “in the last decade, a total of twenty-five institutions have committed major NCAA violations involving academic fraud anything from university employee 's writing papers to taking tests for athletes to pass courses without actually having gone to class” (Wagner, 2013). Some athletes are being taught to cheat and that it is okay for them to cheat so that they are eligible to play. This might not seem like a correlation between academic fraud and doping, but they are essentially the same thing. Academic fraud is allowing a student to cheat to that they are able to play, and doping is cheating so that they play better or are allowed to play. This again is fostering a culture where it is okay for the athletes to cheat so that they are able to play. This is related to money in that universities are going to get more money if they win, so if there best player is eligible to play then they will have a better chance of winning and therefore making more

More about Hegemony Theory In Sports

Open Document