It would be accurate to suggest that Taha Muhammad Ali expresses an idea in poetry that Joseph Williams and Greg Colomb express in form in “Argument, Critical Thinking and Rationality”. In Williams and Colomb Essay (2012) they explain how arguments help us to critically think, arguments allow us to stop and think about what we want to say or what action we want to take. To persuade someone to accept what we are saying or the action we are going to take we can provide facts (p.117). In Taha Muhammad Ali’s poem Revenge Ali is in a way arguing with himself and persuading himself on what action he should take. Muhammad Ali stops and thinks about the man that murdered his father; Taha expresses that if someone cares for this man then he will not take that man’s life. Williams and Colomb (2012) also explain how in order to live in …show more content…
Muhammad Ali is able to put himself in his father’s murders shoes and the shoes of that man’s family. Muhammad Ali may not understand the man’s actions but he is able to understand and have empathy, if he was to kill this man he is causing other people more pain and suffering. Empathy is not always easy to achieve. Currently as a nation we are debating whether or not we should allow the Syrian refugees into our country. After the attack on Paris and the ISIS threat against America next, it is easy to see why Americans would not want to let Syrian refugees into our country. It is a difficult decision to make, especially since most of the refugees are women and children. These refugees are trying to escape the terrors and wars that are going on in their home country. However, United States officials must remain cautious with who we are letting into our country at this time. Many citizens are nervous to let so many people into our country. The challenge that the United States officials face is if we
Moreover, there were biological factors (nature) that contributed to his murderous spree. The underdeveloped prefrontal cortex of Malvo pushed him to perform violent acts since he was not using the part of the brain that sorts out consequences. Due to this Muhammad had a golden opportunity to slide in and brainwash, manipulate, and abuse him. It is difficult to label whether nature or nurture dictates the criminality of an individual but in Malvo’s case it did show that that the Bio-Psycho-Social factors worked simultaneously and contributed to the birth of a serial murderer known as the DC sniper.
The Kite Runner, written by Khaled Hosseini, shows how lying and deceit is a counterproductive route when trying to live with a dreadful past, exhibited through the actions of Amir. Amir’s decision to withhold the truth and blatantly lie in several situations due to jealousy and his desire for Baba to be proud of him amounts to further pain and misery for himself and those he deceives. Because of Amir’s deceit towards Baba and Hassan, his guilt from his past manifests itself into deeply-rooted torment, not allowing him to live his life in peace. The guilt from Amir’s past is only alleviated when he redeems his sins by taking in Sohrab, contributing to the theme that the only way “to be good again” is through redemption, not shunning the past.
There are many ways to express an opinion: paintings, poems, sculptures, speeches, etc. Alexandre Dumas chose to express his opinions over vengeance through his book, The Count of Monte Cristo. Dumas clearly believes that vengeance is not the answer for those who have wrong you in times past. This is shown is his book when the Count of Monte Cristo’s plot for revenge on those who sent him to jail for 14 years goes to far and kills an innocent person. Although at the beginning of the book, when the Count explains to young Albert and his friend, Franz, that he would fight a duel for something simple, but for someone that caused him horrible suffering, he would inflict suffering just as horrible. He justifies his statement with, “‘An eye
his chance to kill his father's murder but, he is praying. By killing him while
As soon as Muhammad Ali was notified, upset, he declared that he would refuse to serve in the Army and told everyone himself a conscientious objector. He came out saying that the war is against the teachings of the Holy Qur’an and that he was not trying to dodge the draft. He claimed that due to his religion, Muslim, he is not supposed to take part in no wars unless the war has been declared by the Muslim God Allah. With his in mind, Muhammad Ali refused to step forward the first time when his name was called. Due to this he was ultimately committing a felony that was punishable by up to five years in prison and a fine of $10,000 maximum. For not coming forward a second time Muhammad Ali was ultimately arrested. On the same day following
Iqbal feels a disease of inactivity (aboulie) and a moral crisis within him. He thinks, “Should he go out, face the mob and tell them in clear ringing tones that this was wrong- immoral?”(178; ch.4) He is sure that religion is not considered before the bullets. So, this play with the gun in the ring of religion is absolutely an irresponsible work against humanity. Ultimately, he can not go out and do something to stop the riot. Iqbal analyses the reason, “In such circumstances what can you do but cultivate an utter indifference to all values? Nothing matters. Nothing whatever…” (181; ch.4) So it is clear that Iqbal who thinks to be a follower of human values and a true worshipper of humanity, too, can not do anything but to remain indifferent and silent like Hukum Chand toward the crisis.
Muhammad Ali is an example of a person who not only cares for himself and his family, but he also cares for everyone in need, following the Catholic social justice teaching of solidarity. Muhammad Ali’s legend will always remain in history, not only as one of the greatest human beings and boxers ever to live, also for his efforts and contributions to those in need all around the world as well.
"An eye for an eye will make the whole world blind"(Gandhi) An eye for an eye, or revenge, has been a theme that has shown up in many literary pieces throughout history. Although revenge is a common theme in many literary pieces, the reason and outcome of the revenge is often very varied. In “A Poison Tree” by William Blake shows that wrath left unattended will cause more damage oneself and others, in this case resulting in death, as it grows and develops into a form of revenge. In “The Cone” by H.G. Wells there is also a theme of revenge brought about by the entrapment of emotions leading to a revengeful death but this death results in the seeker of revenge feeling remorse. This essay will compare how the murderers in both “A Poison Tree” and “The Cone” feel about the deaths they’ve caused and how their emotions affect the overall theme of the text as a whole.
Anyone can be a hero, it is not a predetermined occupation, rather it can come out of anybody when a conflict arises. To become a hero all one has to do is step in to resolve an issue. In Khaled Hosseini’s The Kite Runner the main conflict of the book is Amir's regret of past sins and desire for atonement. To atone for his sins Amir needs to recognize his wrongdoings, work to make up for them and change as a person. Throughout this story, Amir needs help to complete these steps. He gets help from Rahim Khan: the catalyst for his journey to redemption, Sohrab: Who saves Amir from Assef, and himself who by working hard to make a relationship with Sohrab is able to accept and move on from his past. To complete his journey for atonement Amir needs
In Khaled Hosseini’s The Kite Runner, the author follows the development of protagonist Amir through a life filled with sorrow, regret, and violence. Amir encounters numerous obstacles on his path to adulthood, facing a new test at every twist and turn. Amir embarks on the long journey known as life as a cowardly, weak young man with a twisted set of ideals, slowly but surely evolving into a man worthy of the name. Amir is one of the lucky few who can go through such a shattered life and come out the other side a better man, a man who stands up for himself and those who cannot, willing to put his life on the line for the people he loves.
... Muhammad was an evil man. We know he was evil because we have read about his teachings, and about the practices of the Nation of Islam. Baldwin knew he was evil in the same way. And we know that Baldwin knew Muhammad was evil because Baldwin wrote about Muhammad’s hatred in his essay, “Down at the Cross”. But Baldwin demonstrated wisdom by not sharing his views with Muhammad, and he demonstrated humbleness by not being consumed by his views and disagreeing with Muhammad. This helps us, readers of Baldwin, learn just that much more about this complex author.
While the semester is over and the deadline has expired, I thought I would write this to express my true intended thoughts.
Another casual night: the air is sticky, and the water is scarce, all throughout the country the sound of gunshots are ringing through the air. For most people, this “casual” night is beyond their wildest imagination, but for Syrians it is an ongoing nightmare. Faced with the trauma of a civil war, Syrian refugees seek protection and a more promising future than the life they currently live in their oppressive country. Many seek refuge in other Middle East countries like Turkey and Jordan, but others search for hope in the icon of freedom, the United States of America. However, in America, there is an ongoing debate about whether or not Syrian refugees should be accepted. America needs to accept the Syrian refugees because if they do not, the
Our moral duty to Syrian refugees. National Post. N.p. 15 January 2014. Web.
In his essay Critical Thinking: What Is It Good For? (In Fact, What Is It), Howard Gabennesch explains the importance of critical thinking by drawing attention to how its absence is responsible for societies many ills including, but not limited to, the calamity in Vietnam. Yet, at the end of his essay, Gabennesch also mentions that, despite “the societal benefits of critical thinking, at the individual level, uncritical thinking offers social and psychological rewards of its own.”(14). Similarly, it is these rewards that, like the bait on a fishhook, often make individuals hesitant to engage in critical thinking despite the resulting harm to both them and society.